If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
If you take the shroud off and send it in, in addition to breaking a law by mailing it, won't you also now be in possession of an SBR?
How the frick would removing a fake suppressor "barrel shroud" make it an SBR?If you take the shroud off and send it in, in addition to breaking a law by mailing it, won't you also now be in possession of an SBR?
Oh for crying out loud, is this for real? What should we really be doing if we have one of these (I'm not admitting to anything -- just hypothetical)?
Isn't it also illegal in MA to have a silencer regardless of paying the $200 tax or not? And, I bet MA probably goes by the federal definition of silencer? Therefore, if the definition changes to declare something a silencer, it would suddenly be illegal by default in MA?
Or am I overthinking the problem?
Thats why ATI will send you a new legal fake suppressor...It looks really silly without the shroud though. What's an owner of this supposed to do?
#1.
How the frick would removing a fake suppressor "barrel shroud" make it an SBR?
..
Because I "fricken" thought the whole thing came off.
I'm not following...if the "whole thing" came off the gun would clearly already be an SBR???Because I "fricken" thought the whole thing came off.
great point! talk about lose-lose. not matter what you do your breaking a law.
Can I point out the irony here? You are suggesting that people are overly concerned when the ATF is declaring non-functional components to be NFA thus placing you in immediate violation of both state and Federal law which have no exception for "unless you didn't mean it and/or we changed the definition mid-stream"Jesus Christ guys take off the tin foil hats!
I'm not following...if the "whole thing" came off the gun would clearly already be an SBR???
Can I point out the irony here? You are suggesting that people are overly concerned when the ATF is declaring non-functional components to be NFA thus placing you in immediate violation of both state and Federal law which have no exception for "unless you didn't mean it and/or we changed the definition mid-stream"
Can I point out the irony here? You are suggesting that people are overly concerned when the ATF is declaring non-functional components to be NFA thus placing you in immediate violation of both state and Federal law which have no exception for "unless you didn't mean it and/or we changed the definition mid-stream"