EFA10 on a non compliant rifle

[theconverted]

So with the new laws potentially coming, I had a question about registering a non-compliant rifle. It currently lives in Maine and has all the fun stuff they don't allow in Mass. Would submitting paperwork on it before the transfer ban goes into effect have any advantage if I did ever want to neuter it to bring it into the state? Not planning on it, but want to make sure I'm not closing doors by doing nothing now.

 

[kalash]

How would MA know where the rifle is or what features it has?

 

[Palladin]

Don't move to MA

 

[DW357]

So with the new laws potentially coming, I had a question about registering a non-compliant rifle. It currently lives in Maine and has all the fun stuff they don't allow in Mass. Would submitting paperwork on it before the transfer ban goes into effect have any advantage if I did ever want to neuter it to bring it into the state? Not planning on it, but want to make sure I'm not closing doors by doing nothing now.

This makes no sense. If the rifle is in Maine why would you FA10 it??

Amazing how people are actually trying to figure out ways to comply with the latest gun bill bullshit. Which by the way still needs to go to the senate.

I gave up caring years ago long before this latest gun bill.

 

[DW357]

Bring it into the state and make it AWB compliant (if you care about that) and be done with it.

 

[FalArAk]

I think by Maine he means his safe.

 

[Picton]

Amazing how people are actually trying to figure out ways to comply with the latest gun bill bullshit.

This.

Why be "law-abiding" when the law is unconstitutional?

If this bill passes as is? Just go up to Maine, grab your lawful property, and bear it, as is your right. And if MA tries to tyrannize you? Then I guess the case that frees us all will be Healy vs Theconverted.

Take heart and be a patriot. You're a free man. Act like one.

 

[HorizontalHunter]

Isn’t there a rule about not having to self incriminat?

 

[DarthRevan]

Simple, do not comply...

 

[pastera]

Isn’t there a rule about not having to self incriminat?

Haynes v. United States - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

While you could be prosecuted for possession of a banned gun, you cannot be prosecuted for not registering it.

 

[puška m70]

Haynes v. United States - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

While you could be prosecuted for possession of a banned gun, you cannot be prosecuted for not registering it.

The Wikipedia article is about a federally prohibited person, no? IANAL but how would it be an issue in that way since MA doesn't have jurisdiction in another state. How can you be charged in MA by MA laws for possessing an "assault weapon" in another state where they are allowed? The law is that it's illegal to possess in MA.

 

[zboys]

Man, some of you guys give me some mean ass migraines

 

[puška m70]

While a little confusing, I think OP is asking this in anticipation of the recent law being passed.

He has an "assault weapon" in Maine, but is a MA resident. Would it be wise to EFA 10 it so it's on the books in order to be allowed to own in MA in the case of a grandfather clause that applies to previously owned, EFA-10'd guns. In the event he brought it to MA, it would be in AWB-compliant configuration.

IANAL, but I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to EFA 10, so if he decides to bring it into MA, it would be OK to possess in AWB complaint configuration.

 

[silversquirrel]

So sick of this "gun A" is good but "gun B" is bad bullshit. It only feeds to the antis idiotic fear of guns. It needs to be ignored.

 

[DW357]

While a little confusing, I think OP is asking this in anticipation of the recent law being passed.

He has an "assault weapon" in Maine, but is a MA resident. Would it be wise to EFA 10 it so it's on the books in order to be allowed to own in MA in the case of a grandfather clause that applies to previously owned, EFA-10'd guns. In the event he brought it to MA, it would be in AWB-compliant configuration.

IANAL, but I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to EFA 10, so if he decides to bring it into MA, it would be OK to possess in AWB complaint configuration.

Less of a paper trail the better IMO
IANAL either

 

[drgrant]

Man, some of you guys give me some mean ass migraines

I just convert the posts mentally into a risitas like internal response. Keeps bp low and headaches at bay


View: https://youtu.be/vIhdv5_cJaw?si=W92n4XrC9XlD8ne9

 

[mcb]

Maybe it’s time to start a Compliance sub forum … with a way to block every thread in there.

 

[Snora]

OP is onto something. I'm going to eFA-10 100 different AR serial numbers tonight so I can build 80% lowers for the rest of my life.

 

[drgrant]

Maybe it’s time to start a Compliance sub forum … with a way to block every thread in there.

We can give it an icon with a jar of Vaseline.....

 

[kalash]

OP is onto something. I'm going to eFA-10 100 different AR serial numbers tonight so I can build 80% lowers for the rest of my life.

Just eFA10 every serial you see posted online (IG, arfcom, reddit, etc). Bonus points if you file it under other people's names for funsies.

 

[paracarry]

I thought the term assault weapon was only used by news media and anti's.

 

[pastera]

The Wikipedia article is about a federally prohibited person, no? IANAL but how would it be an issue in that way since MA doesn't have jurisdiction in another state. How can you be charged in MA by MA laws for possessing an "assault weapon" in another state where they are allowed? The law is that it's illegal to possess in MA.

No, it is a SCOTUS opinion on self incrimination by registering a firearm you are prohibited from owning so it is applicable to ALL inferior courts (and every court is inferior to SCOTUS)

 

[Mesatchornug]

I thought the term assault weapon was only used by news media and anti's.

You know they got it from our own advertisements, right? They're hardly that creative on their own.