Democratic California state senators intro bill to enable civil suits against mfr, imptr, seller of verboten firearms, parts

DispositionMatrix

NES Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
4,339
Likes
1,886
Location
SoNH
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
SB1327:
Bill Text - SB-1327 Firearms: private rights of action.
This bill would create a private right of action for any person against any person who, within this state, manufactures or causes to be manufactured, distributes, transports, or imports into the state, or causes to be distributed or transported or imported into the state, keeps for sale or offers or exposes for sale, or gives or lends any firearm lacking a serial number required by law, assault weapon, .50 BMG rifle, or firearm precursor part, subject to certain exceptions, as specified. The bill would make these provisions inoperative upon invalidation of a specified law in Texas, and would repeal its provisions on January 1 of the following year.

This bill would also state that all statutes regulating or prohibiting firearms shall not be construed to repeal any other statute regulating or prohibiting firearms, in whole or in part, unless the statute specifically states that it is repealing another statute. The bill would state that every statute that regulates or prohibits firearms is severable in each application to any particular person or circumstance and that any statute found to be unconstitutional by a court shall remain enforceable as to any application that would not be unconstitutional.
It would be foolish to think Governor-anoint Healey won't want to jump on board with this on day one, assuming Baker doesn't beat her to it.
 
SB1327 is the promised retaliatory law from California:
New California Bill Creates Landmark Private Right of Action to Limit Spread of Illegal Weapons - Utilizes Similar Tactics to Texas’ Recent Abortion Law for Citizens to Sue
February 20, 2022 - DEL MAR – Last Friday, Senate Majority Leader Emeritus Bob Hertzberg (D-Van Nuys) joined Governor Gavin Newsom to announce new legislation that heeds the Governor’s call for a bill to limit the spread of dangerous assault weapons and ghost guns utilizing similar tactics to Texas’ recent abortion law.
Some political grandstanding:
“We must do everything we can to address the gun violence epidemic that plagues our country. No parent or grandparent should ever get a call about a child we failed to protect when we had the opportunity to do so. It’s time to hold gun manufacturers accountable for their part in perpetuating this crisis,” said Senator Anthony Portantino (D-La Cañada Flintridge). “We've now seen the precedent set to empower individuals to bring civil actions. We must seize this moment to extend that ability against those who manufacture, distribute or transport ghost guns into California. I appreciate the Governor's leadership and look forward to working with him, Senator Hertzberg and my colleagues as we continue to strengthen our state’s gun laws and make our families and communities safer.”
Boilerplate Democratic propaganda repeated:
“In California, 30% of all firearms now recovered by law enforcement are unserialized, untraceable ‘ghost guns,’ according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives,” said Assemblymember Chris Ward (D-San Diego). “Despite already being illegal in our state, this is a growing problem that is quickly getting out of control. I’m proud to co-author this bill with Senator Hertzberg to allow individuals to bring civil actions against those who continue to manufacture, transport and distribute these weapons in California.”
 

Newsom signs California gun bill modeled after Texas abortion law​


California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday signed a bill into law that allows private citizens to bring civil action against anyone who manufactures, distributes, transports or imports assault weapons or ghost guns, which are banned in the state.

California Senate Bill 1327 is modeled after a Texas law that allows private citizens to bring civil litigation against abortion providers or anyone who assists a pregnant person in obtaining an abortion after as early as six weeks of pregnancy.

Under the California law, a person would also be able to sue a licensed firearms dealer who "sells, supplies, delivers, or gives possession or control of a firearm" to anyone under 21 years old. It allows citizens to sue for a minimum of $10,000 on each weapon involved, as well as attorney fees.

Newsom, a Democrat, on Friday acknowledged that the law would likely be challenged in court.

California Senate Bill 1327

CNN is the only one covering this at the moment

 
"The bill would make these provisions inoperative upon invalidation of a specified law in Texas...."

Now, I didn't go to law school, but why the f*** does a CA law hinge on a TX law? Doesn't Cali have its hands full of its own shitstorm without trying to intimidate other states? And why would TX (or anybody else) give a shit what North Mexico does?
 
Back
Top Bottom