I've read Comm2A brief and i found that it was easy to read and connected each peice together. In short very good argument. I haven't watched the video yet. If Holden's attorney was basically asked if the Comm2A amicus is correct and he says no do the justices look into it? Do they say "hey this things spells everything out all nice and clear but the attorney arguing the case doesn't seem to know what he is talking about. Do they throw it out and just listen to him? Can they just rule that Holden didn't prove his case and tough your a PP?