DarthRevan
NES Member
Best of luck to DD.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I don't care HOW any future lawsuits come out.
Paloma is NOT GUILTY!
Yes
Don't judge me. I'm a lesbian.
Is Paloma male or female?
I don't care HOW any future lawsuits come out.
Paloma is NOT GUILTY!
I bet you want to do some CNC with her?
I don't see much in her background at all, she is from UK but no idea how much tech expertise she got running a development group never mind CEO. I don't know, we'll see.
A little thin for my taste but I'd be willing to find out.Is Paloma male or female?
I bet you want to do some CNC with her?
I don't see much in her background at all, she is from UK but no idea how much tech expertise she got running a development group never mind CEO. I don't know, we'll see.
From the press conference and copied from the ARS article, (bold added by me):
, but upon moving to the US (first to New York City) she eventually settled in Austin to specifically work for Defense Distributed. It is unclear what her background in firearms is or if she has any prior experience running a controversial company facing active civil litigation.
When asked how she came to work for Defense Distributed, Heindorff simply said she admired the company from afar.
"It's the most effective and elegant activism I'd seen performed and I wanted to be a part of that," she said.
Will need a deep dive on her background beyond her presser talking points. It's one hell of a career swing, hopefully she has enough sense to not run it into the ground.I saw that, but I don't see anything else that's tech or education related. I see some of her poetry reading and movie appearance, but nothing like graduating with an education. How the f*** did they find her again?
Will need a deep dive on her background beyond her presser talking points. It's one hell of a career swing, hopefully she has enough sense to not run it into the ground.
"It's the most effective and elegant activism I'd seen performed and I wanted to be a part of that," she said.
well, at the moment they can't keep up with orders, so they got that going for them. Perhaps her creative artsy-fartsy side will do some good, who know. I have no idea what kind of a person she is and how you jump from UK and poetry into hardcore 2a guns for all stands. That's totally lost on me and I'm sure that there will be more questions like these.
She mentioned that she has track record of projects, but nothing about professional life running a company with what, 50 employees? I just want to know what the hell she was doing before heading to US.
I’ve spoken to her before on the phone and she’s always been pleasant. Setting up a group buy for the GG2 is easy, it’s the cost of getting people to commit to buying that’s tough
Not to mention group ownership of a GG2 breaks the law as I understand it.
Not to mention group ownership of a GG2 breaks the law as I understand it. It's OK to buy one for yourself and then sell it when you're done with it, I think.
Joint ownership should be fine. The risk seems to be at renting it out.Not to mention group ownership of a GG2 breaks the law as I understand it. It's OK to buy one for yourself and then sell it when you're done with it, I think.
Really? Its a piece of property, why can it not have multiple owners?
IANAL but my understanding is it's legal to manufacture firearms for personal use using your own tools and equipment.
I could be wrong but group ownership of a GG2 looks to me very much like pushing a button on someone else's CNC machine and we know the ATF has jammed people up for that. I would not do it anyway. That's my risk tolerance.
Also, if I were finishing 80% lowers in Mass. no-one else would know about it.
If you are a full owner, or you are a part owner, you are still an owner and its still your tool. Understand the risk tolerance - there are other ways you can get hung up, the definition of ownership is not at the forefront.
It is absolutely not necessary to hold title to a tool you use to manufacture a gun.
That’s a fantastic point. It’s all about the operator.
Can we get back into the “is she a dude” question. Inquiring minds want to know.
she is probably just Spanish.
It's a nonprofit. He has no ownership stakes. The org pays for itself based on sales of GG, etc. He was (probably) paid a salary as President/ED/whatever his title was. Now he's not the head of the org, and the BOD named her as his replacement.I don't understand the concept of a founding owner of a company "stepping down".
He founded and has ownership in the company.
Did he just say "Ok guys, I'm giving all my shares of the company to x, y, z."
Can he be compensated for in effect "selling" his stake in DD?
He probably didn't have much of his own money since he put his efforts into DD.
Now he needs money for his criminal defense.
How will he be able to pay his bills?