Cody Wilson meets female via SugarDaddyMeet.com, gets charged with child sexual assault

Broccoli Iglesias said:
Hypothetical scenario...you are a chick, I ask you how old you are and you text me/Email me you are 19, maybe even show me a fake ID.

How the f*** am I supposed to know you are 17?
Click to expand...

Bob P said:
He would have to be able to prove somehow she presented evidence to him she was over 18. Like a photocopy of an ID. No lie.
Click to expand...


These statutory laws regarding sex and someone who is underage do not allow for such a defense. They are literally written such that if the act occurred you are guilty. Doesn't matter if you were deceived or defrauded.

And yes, that is bullshit. These statutes should not be written that way. But they are and that is exceedingly unlikely to change.
 
soloman02 said:
These statutory laws regarding sex and someone who is underage do not allow for such a defense. They are literally written such that if the act occurred you are guilty. Doesn't matter if you were deceived or defrauded.
Click to expand...
That even happened in NH a few years back.

A couple were drinking at a club with a younger woman. Because it was a 21+ establishment and she was being served, they had no reason to believe she was underage.

The three of them went home and had a threesome. They took pictures.

The younger woman turned out to be 16 or 17, old enough to consent to the sex in NH. But, she was under 18, which makes the pictures child porn in every state and under federal law.

Husband and wife were convicted for producing child porn.
 
soloman02 said:
These statutory laws regarding sex and someone who is underage do not allow for such a defense. They are literally written such that if the act occurred you are guilty. Doesn't matter if you were deceived or defrauded.
Click to expand...

Where does it say it's not allowed? Only problem I see is it's not tested well. I bet hard proof of fraud would at least hang a jury,, unless you're arguing that the judge can suppress this evidence. If course this never gets tested because of the obvious preselection bias problem; eg the guys asking for proof are likely not of the sort that's going to get into trouble to begin with....

-Mike
 
soloman02 said:
These statutory laws regarding sex and someone who is underage do not allow for such a defense. They are literally written such that if the act occurred you are guilty. Doesn't matter if you were deceived or defrauded.

And yes, that is bullshit. These statutes should not be written that way. But they are and that is exceedingly unlikely to change.
Click to expand...


And what actual hard evidence does the state have that actual intercourse or some other sexual activity happened? DNA from semen sample collected? Or is it just her word against his?

Also, what happens if I'm 18 but I legally married a 13 year old with parental consent and a judges approval if I get caught with naked pics of my legal wife? Am I still going to jail for child porn for having pics of my own wife?

this-doesnt-make-any-sense.jpg
 
drgrant said:
Where does it say it's not allowed? Only problem I see is it's not tested well. I bet hard proof of fraud would at least hang a jury,, unless you're arguing that the judge can suppress this evidence. If course this never gets tested because of the obvious preselection bias problem; eg the guys asking for proof are likely not of the sort that's going to get into trouble to begin with....

-Mike
Click to expand...

In NH it doesn't. However the NH Supreme court has said a teen lying about their age is not allowed as a defense because the legislature has not explicitly allowed it. Per the opinion (decided in 2007) a majority of states did not allow such a defense to statutory rape charges.

https://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/2007/holme008.pdf
 
Johnnyh said:
And what actual hard evidence does the state have that actual intercourse or some other sexual activity happened? DNA from semen sample collected? Or is it just her word against his?

Also, what happens if I'm 18 but I legally married a 13 year old with parental consent and a judges approval if I get caught with naked pics of my legal wife? Am I still going to jail for child porn for having pics of my own wife?

this-doesnt-make-any-sense.jpg
Click to expand...

Most likely, mainly because you know for a fact that your wife is under age 18. However, NH recently, as in this year, changed their marriage laws and a person under 16 cannot get married anymore. Thus NH's age of consent matches the age of marriage (a judge and parental consent is still needed if one or both parties is 16 or 17).
 
KBCraig said:
You should be more concerned that the US will revoke your passport because you've embarrassed the government.
Click to expand...

Yeah, what was that about Americans being citizens and not subjects? That's looking so 20th Century.

The passport revocation is bad news, we exist at the whim of our deep state masters.
 
Last edited:
The other burning question, is what's going to happen to Defense Distributed?

From a Reddit forum a couple of days ago;

Link:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/Defense_Distributed/comments/9hrq6l/future_of_defense_distributed/



"The following statements are mine and mine alone. They do not reflect CRW's thoughts/opinions/actions. This is not an official statement from Defense Distributed and/or any of its subsidiaries. I am offering this personal statement as a reassurance that Ghost Gunner and its related products are not legally connected to CRW's present legal difficulties. I will not answer questions related to CRW's present situation, as that is not the point of this statement. My goal is to reassure you - our customers - that GhostGunner's future is not immediately in jeopardy.

Who am I?
I have been DD's primary engineer since 2013. Specifically, I designed most of our 3DP creations (including Liberator). I am GhostGunner's primary designer. Specifically, if you purchased a GG more than two years ago, then every single design aspect of that machine - except for the DDcut software executable AND the initial (opensource) grbl firmware (which I modified for GG) - was my creation. Since then, we've had other people design certain aspects, primarily because I took an extended break from DD after burning myself out designing and shipping the original machine. I am forever grateful for the others who took over maintaining GG in my absence (I was available for critical issues (e.g. redesigning GG's spindle)). I reveal this information not to brag, but to answer OP's concerns about DD's future. From a technological perspective, we will still be able to create products. It helps that Cody and I share each others' vision, so I believe we can continue to disrupt in his absence.

I know Cody well and talked with him regularly (three times yesterday). In regards to "DD's future", Cody is the visionary and a brilliant agitator. The risk that I go to prison due to anything DD has done are 0%; Cody and I were always very careful to make sure that anything legally uncertain was always done with his neck on the line. So I'm not going anywhere.
I won't go into too much detail on the financials, but I will point out that all donations y'all made during last month's fundraising drive went directly to the Second Amendment Foundation; neither DD nor CRW touched a single dollar. We did this to maximize your donations; for political reasons, DD has had a difficult time maintaining our tax exempt status, whereas the SAF has a much easier time not paying any tax on your donations... for that reason they got the money directly, as they are also a plaintiff. In short, any dollar you donated will be used to support our 1st and 2nd amendment cases. A few of y'all noted that when y'all previously asked "I thought I was donating to DD, but the receipt says SAF. Why is that?" Purchase y'all made for patches/USB drives/any physical object went directly to our bank account, which we retain access to.
We have operated without Cody's presence for long periods in the past. While these allegations are generating a media frenzy, I can assure y'all that it's business as usual for the most part. We are getting quite a few more phone calls than normal, and the press has tried really hard to come inside, but at the moment all business components related to Ghost Gunner are running 100%.

If Cody is tried, sentenced, and ends up in prison, then we'll certainly lose "the same edginess about [our] brand," but from a technological/product pipeline/production/fulfillment standpoint, we are very well capable of continuing to function. In fact, we just hired a new engineer on Monday (who is a bit confused at the moment, but is still coming to work).

You must know that Cody and I have long understood that he might end up in prison (although I didn't think it would be under these circumstances), so rest assured we had a plan for when yesterday finally arrived.

Thank you for your support. We will issue an official statement as soon as such statement doesn't incur any legal obligations."
 
If you are active on this forum, or you are a gun owner in MA, consider yourself "special". You no longer have a normal life of Joe Schmo who could possibly get away with things. You will not get away with anything! With that said you need to be aware that if you use any digital technology (mobile phones, computers, internet banking) it takes less than 2 hours to "hack" you into a completely different person and the person you think you were will be erased from the digital universe. Let's not be stupid here, and let's recall that the digital technology is here for "the ease of use", if you need a translation for that you have a problem already!
 
rep308 said:
https://gizmodo.com/gun-activist-cody-wilson-released-from-texas-jail-after-1829264620

Gun Activist Cody Wilson Released From Texas Jail After Posting Bond For Sex Assault of a Minor

can't hide anywhere anymore:
Wilson reportedly fled to Taiwan earlier this month after getting tipped off about the charges, and was arrested there on Friday after trying to rent an apartment. The apartment owner recognized Wilson from the recent TV coverage in Taiwan and notified the police
Click to expand...

LOL!
The apartment owner recognized Wilson from the recent TV coverage
Wow! They learned from KGB a thing or two. Putin also likes to incorporate "active citizen" into his elaborate KGB operations. Mission accomplished thanks to babushka from the apartment below! I am impressed!
 
Last edited:
soloman02 said:
In NH it doesn't. However the NH Supreme court has said a teen lying about their age is not allowed as a defense because the legislature has not explicitly allowed it. Per the opinion (decided in 2007) a majority of states did not allow such a defense to statutory rape charges.

https://www.courts.state.nh.us/supreme/opinions/2007/holme008.pdf
Click to expand...

That isn't how laws work.

Yeah I know. That's how our "Justice" system works. It's just that a 5th grader in the special class knows that's stupid.
 
namedpipes said:
That isn't how laws work.

Yeah I know. That's how our "Justice" system works. It's just that a 5th grader in the special class knows that's stupid.
Click to expand...

Yes it is stupid. But that is the "justice" system we live under. So accept it, and if you get the opportunity, work with some legislators to try and change those small aspects of it to be better.
 
soloman02 said:
Yes it is stupid. But that is the "justice" system we live under. So accept it, and if you get the opportunity, work with some legislators to try and change those small aspects of it to be better.
Click to expand...

this has become a systemic problem with far reaching implications. Picking up people on trumped up charges is the problem, "no defense for being deceived" is just a vehicle, one of many. The real root of the problem lies in selective prosecution of specific people. Showing up hi cap mags on national tv? ... that was cool, but annoying .gov with useless designs gets you instant international manhunt and instant passport revocation like the world is f***ing on fire.

Strock, is just an indication, a mold on a skin of an apple that disguises the fact that power-wielding organizations are rotten to the core, that individual JWs in position of power can start their personal crusades or just follow the comrades in the upper echelons. The puppetiers behind the curtain is the real problem, not the way/means they chose to take their target out.
 
drgrant said:
Where does it say it's not allowed?
Click to expand...
While it's not what he's currently charged with, this code can be easily tacked on as well:

Sec. 43.02. PROSTITUTION.

(a) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly offers or agrees to receive a fee from another to engage in sexual conduct.

( . . . )

(c) An offense under Subsection (a) is a Class B misdemeanor, except that the offense is:

(1) a Class A misdemeanor if the actor has previously been convicted one or two times of an offense under Subsection (a); or

(2) a state jail felony if the actor has previously been convicted three or more times of an offense under Subsection (a).

(c-1) An offense under Subsection (b) is a Class B misdemeanor, except that the offense is:

(1) a Class A misdemeanor if the actor has previously been convicted one or two times of an offense under Subsection (b);

(2) a state jail felony if the actor has previously been convicted three or more times of an offense under Subsection (b); or

(3) a felony of the second degree if the person with whom the actor agrees to engage in sexual conduct is:

(A) younger than 18 years of age, regardless of whether the actor knows the age of the person at the time of the offense;

(B) represented to the actor as being younger than 18 years of age; or

(C) believed by the actor to be younger than 18 years of age.
 
soloman02 said:
Yes it is stupid. But that is the "justice" system we live under. So accept it, and if you get the opportunity, work with some legislators to try and change those small aspects of it to be better.
Click to expand...

It would take hundreds or thousands of people working their whole lives to find and correct all the similar issues in our set of federal, state and local laws.

And that is if the various lawmaking bodies actually WANTED the fixes, which is absurd to think. If that were so they'd stop piling on more bad laws on to old bad laws.
 
KBCraig said:
While it's not what he's currently charged with, this code can be easily tacked on as well:

Sec. 43.02. PROSTITUTION.

(a) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly offers or agrees to receive a fee from another to engage in sexual conduct.

( . . . )

(c) An offense under Subsection (a) is a Class B misdemeanor, except that the offense is:

(1) a Class A misdemeanor if the actor has previously been convicted one or two times of an offense under Subsection (a); or

(2) a state jail felony if the actor has previously been convicted three or more times of an offense under Subsection (a).

(c-1) An offense under Subsection (b) is a Class B misdemeanor, except that the offense is:

(1) a Class A misdemeanor if the actor has previously been convicted one or two times of an offense under Subsection (b);

(2) a state jail felony if the actor has previously been convicted three or more times of an offense under Subsection (b); or

(3) a felony of the second degree if the person with whom the actor agrees to engage in sexual conduct is:

(A) younger than 18 years of age, regardless of whether the actor knows the age of the person at the time of the offense;

(B) represented to the actor as being younger than 18 years of age; or

(C) believed by the actor to be younger than 18 years of age.
Click to expand...


so the little whore is also charges with prostitution and the site is charged with facilitation? Are their passports canceled as well, they are searched for high and low?
 
Cody Wilson, owner of Austin-based 3D gun company, resigns after arrest
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) -- The owner of a Texas company that sells blueprints for making untraceable 3-D printed guns has resigned from the firm after being arrested on charges of having sex with an underage girl.

An official with Austin-based Defense Distributed said Tuesday that Cody Wilson officially resigned Friday evening to tend to "personal matters."

Paloma Heindorff is the director of development for the company. She made the announcement and says she'll be taking Wilson's place. She also says she's "a different person. I'm not trying to replace him as a character."
Click to expand...
 

Similar threads

Ohio man, 81, is charged with murder for shooting dead female Uber driver who was called by a scammer to pick up parcel outside his home
Replies
11
Views
383
slugworth
slugworth
CO Democrats’ ‘Assault Weapons’ Legislation Bans 9mm Pistols With Threaded Barrels
Replies
0
Views
120
Reptile
Reptile
Father Shoots Daughter’s Stepfather 3 Times After Sexual Assault Allegations
Replies
13
Views
637
tuna
tuna
Video: Female University of Chicago Student Disarms Would-Be Robber by Ejecting His Magazine
Replies
18
Views
396
Masswhole
Masswhole
22lr with silencer
Replies
16
Views
277
peterk123
P
Back
Top Bottom