Bell and Flannery also suggest what facts should be read to prospective jurors during impalement. That is required in final pretrial hearing reports.
That sounds pretty painful.
-Mike
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Bell and Flannery also suggest what facts should be read to prospective jurors during impalement. That is required in final pretrial hearing reports.
-This guy is probably broke (or not far from it) or would go broke by round 2 even if he lost, making him an unappealing target for an ambulance chaser.
The door was glass. Looks like the kid smashed the glass up top, bullet hole down low.
View attachment 220043
There are sometimes you are looking for one juror who has a huge heart and has mercy on you and feels bad for you to hang the whole situation.
There are others where you see that one guy with a level head is your best bet and a bleeding liberal anti-gun nut job juror could totally torpedo your case during deliberations. Keep in mind that humans are pack animals and often they will choose the pack over facts and/or truth.
......and lose all your guns to the big vault in the east.While there were some extenuating circumstances here, what this whole thing tells me is that if I'm going to shoot a would be robber, rapist, bad person, etc' coming after me or my family I better know in advance that I'm going to be arrested, charged and sent to court. Basically MA's way of incentivizing the victim mentality
too funny !Probably a prohibited person now
So what was that, practice?No, no change in our not-really "castle doctrine" . . . it needs an appellate court decision to set a legal precedent.
Great outcome for the homeowner. Im from chicopee and have friends who younger siblings knew the kid and have been told he was a trouble maker in general and that the "Friend" whose house they were looking for was away for the week on vacation. Maybe they just chose a B&E on the wrong house
While there were some extenuating circumstances here, what this whole thing tells me is that if I'm going to shoot a would be robber, rapist, bad person, etc' coming after me or my family I better know in advance that I'm going to be arrested, charged and sent to court. Basically MA's way of incentivizing the victim mentality
Wow!!
Game Changa!
cue the appeals in 3....2.....
Or just be sure you open the door first.
As mentioned, no. But I'm sure he'll spend about $50-100K on the wrongful death lawsuit the family will surely file. This is why we need tort reform. First, they should be 100% on the hook for defendants legal bills should they lose - like put it up in an escrow acct. And lawyers should be somehow censured or disbarred for filing frivolous cases. (Not sure how to get there, but we ALL know when a case is just digging for $.)
EDIT TO ADD:
After my 49 years on this Urf, I can honestly say that if the family approached me and said, "Hunnert-G's or we sue" I'd counter and gladly pay out at $50K. I'm not PAYING them anything. I'm BUYING myself peace of mind. YEARS of it. These things drag on for a looooong time. You'll spend it one way or the other. But the other means you'll take years off my life.