Say you run a "Bonded Warehouse" for the purpose of storing guns that were seized by law enforcement due to citizens losing their MA state licenses to have them. And, you have the required FFL and state license to sell at retail.
Under the law, law enforcement (police dept's, etc.) can bring you firearms, rifles, shotguns, and machine guns that they have seized so you can store them because they don't have the room to do it themselves.
Let's focus on the machinegun (and other NFA items) part.
Assumption number 1 would be that you would also have to have a License to Possess a Machine Gun in order to take possession and store them.
Assumption number 2 would be that the PD (police dept.) would have to hang on to it/them until an ATF approved transfer form (Form 3 or Form 4) has been processed and comes back approved, transferring ownership from the person they were seized from to you (the bonded warehouse owner).
Assumption number 3 would be that if they were to be transferred on a Form 3 (tax free), you would have to have paid the annual Special Occupational Tax (SOT) to the ATF in order to deal in these types of guns.
Assumption number 4 is that if you have not done Assumption number 3, then you would have to do a Form 4 (tax paid) and pay the $200 transfer tax on the gun in order to get it transferred to you.
Here's the crux of the matter--some people think that a bonded warehouseman can take in a machine gun without having a state License to Possess a Machine Gun. That's question number 1.
And, some people think that a bonded warehouseman can take in a machine gun without it having been transferred to him first. That's question number 2.
In talking to NFA Branch (they're checking with their lawyers), Ms. Brown said that if there was a court order that ordered them delivered to XYZ Warehouse, that there may not be a problem if ATF Compliance came around for an inspection and found that the warehouse had a machine gun in storage that was not registered to them. However, she felt that with no court order, the warehouseman could be charged with possession of a machine gun that was not registered to him or the company.
My view has always been that you had to have the License to Possess a Machine Gun and you had to do an approved ATF transfer BEFORE you took possession of the machine gun.
As I say, ATF is looking into it.
I believe the License to Possess a Machine Gun is a non-issue--you have to have it to comply with state law. If you disagree, let me know why.
As such, the real question--is can a bonded warehouseman store a machine gun without it being registered to him. He might get away with it under state law since he would be viewed as "helping law enforcement." However under federal law, the keys to his jail cell may be sitting over there in safe #5.
I'll let everyone know what ATF says if and when they get back to me.
In the meantime, what do you think?
HONKY
Under the law, law enforcement (police dept's, etc.) can bring you firearms, rifles, shotguns, and machine guns that they have seized so you can store them because they don't have the room to do it themselves.
Let's focus on the machinegun (and other NFA items) part.
Assumption number 1 would be that you would also have to have a License to Possess a Machine Gun in order to take possession and store them.
Assumption number 2 would be that the PD (police dept.) would have to hang on to it/them until an ATF approved transfer form (Form 3 or Form 4) has been processed and comes back approved, transferring ownership from the person they were seized from to you (the bonded warehouse owner).
Assumption number 3 would be that if they were to be transferred on a Form 3 (tax free), you would have to have paid the annual Special Occupational Tax (SOT) to the ATF in order to deal in these types of guns.
Assumption number 4 is that if you have not done Assumption number 3, then you would have to do a Form 4 (tax paid) and pay the $200 transfer tax on the gun in order to get it transferred to you.
Here's the crux of the matter--some people think that a bonded warehouseman can take in a machine gun without having a state License to Possess a Machine Gun. That's question number 1.
And, some people think that a bonded warehouseman can take in a machine gun without it having been transferred to him first. That's question number 2.
In talking to NFA Branch (they're checking with their lawyers), Ms. Brown said that if there was a court order that ordered them delivered to XYZ Warehouse, that there may not be a problem if ATF Compliance came around for an inspection and found that the warehouse had a machine gun in storage that was not registered to them. However, she felt that with no court order, the warehouseman could be charged with possession of a machine gun that was not registered to him or the company.
My view has always been that you had to have the License to Possess a Machine Gun and you had to do an approved ATF transfer BEFORE you took possession of the machine gun.
As I say, ATF is looking into it.
I believe the License to Possess a Machine Gun is a non-issue--you have to have it to comply with state law. If you disagree, let me know why.
As such, the real question--is can a bonded warehouseman store a machine gun without it being registered to him. He might get away with it under state law since he would be viewed as "helping law enforcement." However under federal law, the keys to his jail cell may be sitting over there in safe #5.
I'll let everyone know what ATF says if and when they get back to me.
In the meantime, what do you think?
HONKY