Sharpshooter in IDPA isn't that bad. Most shooters in IDPA are marksman. And yes, most police are that bad. I've shot with them.Oh come on, cops are lousy shooters, but they are that bad
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
Sharpshooter in IDPA isn't that bad. Most shooters in IDPA are marksman. And yes, most police are that bad. I've shot with them.Oh come on, cops are lousy shooters, but they are that bad
Like any other physical skill, its a function of how much time/effort they put into it individually...And yes, most police are that bad. I've shot with them.
I would disagree. in both you want to put hits on target as fast and as accurately as possible to win. Classification will tell you who is better at it.
In a gun fight, who would you want to go against. a GM or some guy that only goes to shooting classes?
I'll bet on the one who trains and practices gunfighting, not gun playing, more.
Like any other physical skill, its a function of how much time/effort they put into it individually...
Anyone who touches a gun once a year to qualify by irritating a paper target from a relatively short distance is going to be correspondingly bad...
If they, or their department put more time into it than that... They will likely be better... If not, worse...
Supermoto, from what I understand, you are an outstanding shooter. Look around you at your next IPSC match. Most of the folks with you aren't anywhere near as good as you. And most of your club members don't probably don't go to IPSC matches. And most gun owners don't even belong to a club.
You are not the average bear.
Sure, it's easy to pick up a gun and pull the trigger... but you lose your fine motor control under extreme stress - making it that much harder to get your gun into play during a REAL mugging.
Amazing that NH is one of the safest states, yet no permit or training is required to purchase a firearm.
there are far more factors than guns.
how'd they afford the gun then?
I agree. My point was simply that you don't hear about mass amount of shootings from untrained individuals despite few restrictions. The blood in the streets and accidental shootings drew describes isn't a common occurrence.
how'd they afford the gun then?
how'd they afford the gun then?
Gotcha. My mistake!
These same people drive while talking on their cell phones and text messaging.
so what are these gunfighting skills that you train that don't transfer over to gun games?
But let's start with taking all shots from a static two-handed isoceles position. Yeah, that's smart in a fight.
Were in the hell, are you coming up with this Brady Center Bullshit? You have to licensed to do certain things, and in order to obtain certain licenses, you have to be certified or qualified to do so.... So why the hell, should you not have to be properly taught basic firearms safety? Stop using the freaking 2nd Amend, as an excuse for letting people remain ignorant... I'm all for people owning firearms, I'm all for people being able to protect themselves and loved ones... People like me, are trying to change the negative outlook the Anti's are trying to portray... Any body with any common sense, would realize, that if it was mandated to take a basic safety class, then everybody would be educated in safe handling of firearms and the antis wouldnt have a leg to stand on... Some of you are dismissing the fact there so many dumbasses that are getting away with negligence and child neglect/abuse, because their using the 2nd Amend. as a scapegoat for careless or stupidity on their behalf... If they took a safety class and learned how to properly store a firearm when not in use or in your possession then their kid who was left unattended, (another issue I know, but they are linked) wouldnt have gotten a hold of said gun, and shot themselves or another child for matter.... Common sense would tell theese people this stuff, but it still happens... So saying people like me, give fuel to the antis fire is a moronic thing to say....
Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence
"When someone's carrying a gun around and they're not fully trained, oftentimes they'll use it just because it's there,"
http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090804/1aguns04_st.art.htm
"Witnesses reported that the last thing the victim did was pull out his safety glasses, hearing protection and shooting gloves..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZAvyXzBE3Mso what are these gunfighting skills that you train that don't transfer over to gun games?
You have to licensed to do certain things, and in order to obtain certain licenses, you have to be certified or qualified to do so.... So why the hell, should you not have to be properly taught basic firearms safety?
Actually at most USPSA matches some of my squad are around the same level, some are better.
You can't legislate common sense. Some people could take all the courses in the world and still not be safe.
Plenty of people grew up with firearms in the house unlocked and readily accesable prior to all this gun control and training without it being a problem.
The difference is that most parents were responsible and they passed this on to their children. Nowadays not anywhere near as much. Most people want to pass the buck.