Way too many people around here salivating at the the chance to open fire on someone, and ready to dump on anyone who declines to do so. Sounds as if they're pissed at having spent all that money on an LTC and still not having been able to kill somebody yet.
Read the article and tell me at what point it would have been a good idea for the officer would have started shooting. He starts by approaching a group of people acting suspiciously. No, I don't think that's when he should have started blasting. He then pursues one who starts running. No justification there either. Then the fool shoots at the officer as he rounds a corner, and the officer draws his weapon, but has lost sight of the shooter. Start blasting in the general directions? I don't think so. He then searches for the shooter and discovers that he's fallen down stairs, allowing him to disarm and take the shooter into custody without further incident. Looks like a excellent performance by the officer from my point of view, though I suspect some people here are disappointed that he didn't take the opportunity to shoot him when he could have got away with it. Then we could have started an argument as to whether it was a good shoot or an execution, based on not having the evidence necessary to tell one from another.
Ken