• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

AG Campbell Files Briefs in Support of Common Sense Gun Laws

scottco

NES Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2021
Messages
220
Likes
412
Location
Massachusetts
Feedback: 7 / 0 / 0
BOSTON — In the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell this week filed briefs in two ongoing legal cases to defend and uphold common sense Massachusetts laws and regulations intended to protect Massachusetts residents from gun violence.

"Under my leadership, Massachusetts will continue to lead when it comes to preventing gun violence and that means defending our common sense gun laws that keep families safe,” said AG Campbell. “Today, we are calling on the Courts to uphold laws that protect all of us, especially our children, from the deadly use of combat-style assault weapons, weapons with large-capacity magazines and weapons that do not meet minimum safety requirements.”

On Monday, AG Campbell filed a brief in the First Circuit Court of Appeals in the matter of Granata v. Campbell. The brief argues that Massachusetts handgun safety regulations, as established through regulations issued by the Attorney General and by state statute, do not violate the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. These regulations prohibit the commercial sale of handgun models that do not meet minimum safety requirements to protect against accidents like explosion or unintended discharge. The AG contends in the brief that the regulations protect Massachusetts consumers, gun owners and children against firearms accidents.

On Tuesday, AG Campbell filed a brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in National Association for Gun Rights v. Campbell, opposing the plaintiffs’ motion to temporarily block the Massachusetts ban on the sale and possession of assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines. The AG asserts in the filing that combat-style assault rifles and large-capacity magazines—the weapons and accessories of choice in America’s deadliest mass shootings—pose an inordinate risk to the safety of the public and law enforcement officers, with no meaningful utility for individual self-defense.

By filing these briefs, AG Campbell is following through on the commitment she made in her inaugural address to defend Massachusetts’ common sense gun laws in order to prioritize the safety of the public and create safer, healthier communities across the Commonwealth.

Last month, AG Campbell announced her support for legislation filed in the Massachusetts Senate by Senator Michael Moore (D-Millbury) to strengthen current state law prohibiting the purchase, possession and use of silencers by amending the definition of “silencer” to mirror the definition in federal law. At a time when law enforcement officials are seeing an increase in the purchase and possession of illegal firearms, including ghost guns, and firearm accessories, this bill will strengthen enforcement capabilities and protect public safety by helping to keep these devices out of the hands of dangerous individuals.

Following the United States Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the Attorney General’s Office and the Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security issued a joint advisory to provide guidance to licensing authorities and law enforcement officials on how the Court’s decision affects Massachusetts’s firearm licensing laws. The advisory confirmed that it remains unlawful to carry a firearm in Massachusetts without a license and details the strong license-to-carry eligibility requirements that remain in place.

These matters were handled by Division Chief Timothy Casey, Assistant Attorneys General Julie Green, Grace Gohlke and Phoebe Fischer-Groban, and Senior Paralegal Julie Collins, all of the AG’s Constitutional and Administrative Law Division. Substantial assistance was provided by Managing Administrative Assistant Sherrie Costa of the AG’s Government Bureau, Law Librarian Kevin Coakley-Welch and Law Library Student Co-op Emma Williamson.
 
Oooooh!

"Combat-style assault weapons!"

Clark Gregg Marvel GIF by ABC Network
 
What , the same guns that aren't safe for the public to have are fine for cops ?
Cops are fine with unsafe guns that blow up ?
Make that argument in front of a non moonbat judge. please.

That would be 4D chess: getting a judge to order the public safety people to declare police guns unsafe because they don't comply with state testing requirements or some such crap.

I'd love that.
 
That would be 4D chess: getting a judge to order the public safety people to declare police guns unsafe because they don't comply with state testing requirements or some such crap.

I'd love that.
I'm shocked some ambulance chaser hasn't gone after a department following a negligent discharge for, "putting the the public in danger by knowingly issuing duty weapons argued by the AGO in court are too dangerous due to defective safety measures for sale in the commonwealth".
 
Knew what was coming? A statist brief?

It's just virtue signaling with a filing fee. She's defending her own office's policies; any AG would do that. This still doesn't convince me she's got anything new in her quiver.
I think you’re being short sighted. She has a wonderful audience going by the sheer numbers of the election.
She’s spending taxpayer money on this and will not be held accountable for the costs.
 
I think you’re being short sighted. She has a wonderful audience going by the sheer numbers of the election.
She’s spending taxpayer money on this and will not be held accountable for the costs.

What "sheer numbers of the election?"

She's a Democrat in Massachusetts. A high vote percentage isn't a mandate; it just proves the Democrats showed up and pulled the lever. I'd bet money that out of any ten Massachusetts voters from either party, nine of them wouldn't be able to tell you Andrea Campbell's name right now.

We only care about her on this site because guns.

And, again, these are her own department's policies. A judge asked her for a brief. Every public official in America would spend taxpayer money responding the same way.
 
We have the firearms. If they feel so strongly against us owning them. Well, we ain't going to surrender them.
So that only leaves one choice. Your move tyrant!

These politicians are so funny. Disarming their own people and the next thing they are saying is the white man is coming for their lives![rofl2]
Unarmed people are easier to control and if need be exterminated!

Name one time in history where a government disarmed the people, told them they would protect them. Then didn't kill them all?

PS. If you are going to repeat history, at least read the book firstl!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom