If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
They only oppose it when it applies to people who look like them.
Yep, I’ve seen the comments on Facebook saying this very thing. It’s disgusting. The idea should be to bring people to their side. They come out and say “see, this is what we protest about” they are going to get more support for reform. Now, instead they just look hypocritical and nothing will change.
It makes me think more about people being railroaded, too. Everyone has a right to a fair trial, and the idea of convicting any innocent person should make every American‘s blood boil. Unfortunately, social media algorithms thrive on conflict, so, this doesn’t become a constitutional issue, it becomes a race issue because that gets more eyeballs and interactions on social media. People have a lot more common ground than they think if they step away from the crap fake social media accounts out of Russia and China spew. I’m not saying that that’s the only thing causing tension in society, but, when two seemingly opposing groups start sharing base ideologies, and when a trial like this opens the eyes of people who never thought about bad prosecutors existing, that’s not good for those trying to divide the country. blm could have used this trial as a means to show others how bad the system can be for someone who doesn’t have the resources of the government, instead they chose to take the “haha how does it feel” path that others have noted here, while ignoring that Kamala did this very thing to minorities for years.
run this as a thug-life short
They've got two open requests, the first being "with prejudice" (over the 5A violation), the second without (for the not-really-HD drone footage)
Guardian said:
![[rofl]](/xen/styles/default/xenforo/smilies.vb/013.gif "ROFL [rofl]")
Thank you, I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitresses and try the veal.It's looking more and more like there's some seriously hinky shit going on all around that Rittenhouse trial. The blacks all screaming racism - when Rittenhouse shot three white guys - is just phucked up but also seems somewhat put on.
Vox Day had this on his site the other day - gotta say I don't think this theory is totally discountable - when looked at thru the lense of all the other shit games that are being played.
If Rittenhouse actually totally turned the tables on the forces that were arrayed against him and he was indeed the target of a predetermined hit, then that's some superhero type shit right there.
Was Kenosha a Failed Hit? - Vox Popoli
AC postulates that Kyle Rittenhouse was supposed to be the victim of a targeted assassination, as was clearly the case in the murder of Aaron Danielson in Portland. Now suppose the riot was a complex intel operation, being run from an underground command center many miles away, by intel...voxday.net
Was Kenosha a Failed Hit?
AC postulates that Kyle Rittenhouse was supposed to be the victim of a targeted assassination, as was clearly the case in the murder of Aaron Danielson in Portland.
The evidence exposed during the trial does make it appear as if Rittenhouse was selected and set up to be a sacrificial lamb, only he unexpectedly turned out to be a skilled young warrior capable of defeating the antifa ambush team by himself.
And while it is very hard to believe that the USA might have already entered the early stages of a “Bloody Kansas” era, or that Federal agencies are actively targeting young Americans on American soil, unfortunately, that is what the evidence presently suggests.
The real surprise is that some enterprising propagandist hasn’t tried to claim that Kyle Rittenhouse was a secret Spetsnaz agent in an attempt to justify declaring war on Russia.
Everyone should print your advice and post it somewhere prominent.
You can not get a mistrial over a part of a case.
Agree with the first part.
They have asked for both at various times, including in writing.
You mean ‘getting Bingered’?
A mistrial for the actions of third parties not the state would never be with prejudice. They'd look like fools for even suggesting it.
People always think being not guilty is being found "innocent". If he wins the left will always say the DA failed to prove their case.
