• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

The Ragtag Army That Won the Battle of Kyiv and Saved Ukraine

SFC13557

NES Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2019
Messages
4,229
Likes
5,436
Location
Central Ma.
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0

Citizen volunteers teamed up with soldiers to turn the tide in the most consequential European battle since World War II​


By James Marson
Follow

| Photographs by Emanuele Satolli for The Wall Street Journal
Sept. 20, 2022 10:49 am ET

Long account of how Ukranian Military and Civilians adapted and overcame extreme odds to save their country.

"KYIV—Outside the Giraffe shopping mall on the western edge of Ukraine’s capital, a group of locals prepared to meet the Russian armored column thundering their way.

It was late February, and the Russians, from an elite airborne unit, were riding atop their vehicles, as if expecting a warm greeting. One wore a Cossack woolen hat instead of a helmet. Another hadn’t loaded his rifle.

The few dozen Ukrainians from the towns of Irpin and Bucha had other intentions, which they had written on the cement mixer and bulldozer that blocked the road: “Welcome to hell.”
After Russia launched an all-out invasion on Feb. 24, a 32-year-old Ukrainian city council member and solar-power entrepreneur named Volodymyr Korotya had led preparations for a fighting stand. The men were brandishing a grab bag of weapons, including pump-action shotguns and a handful of rocket-propelled grenades. Many were dressed in jeans, and few had body armor. Around half of their number, which included a psychotherapist, a firefighter and a bus driver, had never fought before.
“Look what I do and do the same,” Mr. Korotya, who had seen combat during his time in the Ukrainian army, told the new recruit

As a vanguard of a dozen armored vehicles rumbled over the bridge between Bucha and Irpin and began to climb the hill toward them, the Ukrainians opened fire.

After a fierce three-hour battle, the Russian vehicles were destroyed or abandoned, and the soldiers were dead or in retreat. The Ukrainians set off across the bridge to finish off the rest of the column.

The Russians never crossed that bridge in their monthlong attempt to seize Kyiv.

It’s hard to know how people will react to a huge invasion force. Resistance requires a core of people in villages, towns and cities to find enough courage and motivation to fight rather than flee. Confidence in communities large and small grows with each person who stays and picks up a weapon.

That’s especially true in a country like Ukraine, whose national anthem starts: “The glory and freedom of Ukraine have not yet perished.” That line reflects the nation’s painful attempts over centuries to establish itself as an independent country in the maw of empires.

Russian President Vladimir Putin sent his army into Ukraine to snuff out its latest, 30-year attempt to establish full-fledged independence after the collapse of the Soviet Union. He had boasted that it would take only days for his powerful army to take Kyiv.

Over the next month, enough Ukrainians found the will and means to resist him. They formed armed groups with whatever weapons they could lay their hands on. They fed and equipped fighters and billeted them in their homes. They shimmied up trees in search of cellphone reception to report on enemy movements. The result looked like something little seen in modern warfare—a domestic insurgency fused onto a traditional army.

“We are like a hive of bees,” said Yaroslav Honchar, head of an attack-drone crew who make their own armed craft. “One bee is nothing, but a thousand can defeat a big force.”

To a degree not fully appreciated, it was these citizen soldiers, teaming up with active-duty personnel, who turned the tide in the most consequential battle in Europe since World War II and preserved Ukraine’s status as a sovereign nation. The defense of Kyiv allowed the president to stay and rally national support. He could also then procure the weapons from the U.S. and Europe that are now helping the army to dislodge Russian forces in the east and south.

Without Kyiv’s defenders securing crucial spots around the city in the war’s early days, none of that would have been possible.

Saving the Airport​

The Ukrainian special-forces team needed to get to Kyiv fast. But the roads from their base in western Ukraine were choked with cars heading the other way.

Civilians were panicking. Russian armored columns were streaming toward the capital from Belarus, less than 100 miles to the north. Information was scarce and often contradictory.

Marik, the team’s 32-year-old leader, focused. He needed to locate the sharpest Russian thrust toward Kyiv and figure out how his team could blunt it, he explained later, using only a pseudonym as required by Ukraine’s military.

A cyberattack had cut communications between commanders and units in the field, leaving unsecured cellphones as the only link. But Marik saw no reason to panic. He stuck to his mantra: You can’t win the war on your own; everyone has his own small front.

As the team threaded its way toward Kyiv, Marik saw videos posted online by civilians of around 30 black Russian helicopters swooping low toward the capital from the north. Their target was Antonov Airport in Hostomel, a cargo and testing airstrip about 20 miles from central Kyiv.

Marik’s commanders ordered him there. An understrength National Guard unit and another special-forces team at the airport had managed to shoot down three helicopters and hold off 200 elite paratroopers for nearly three hours before withdrawing when they ran out of ammunition. They had lost the airport but won time.

The Russians set up machine-gun nests and secured airport buildings in preparation for transport planes to land a larger force to thrust into the heart of Kyiv.

Marik had to get there and stop them. Arriving near the airport as darkness fell, he learned that others were also gunning for the Russians.

This would be no repeat of 2014, when Russian irregular fighters seized the city of Slovyansk in Ukraine’s east, igniting a war that was still simmering when Russia’s new invasion force rolled in.

Back then, when Marik was sent in to reclaim the city, his unit was equipped mostly with Soviet remnants, including metal helmets and rubber tourniquets that could snap when pulled tight. Now Marik’s men had Kevlar helmets, fitted body armor and secure American radios with headsets. Western training had helped accustom him to working autonomously in small groups. Special forces’ new motto, taken from a 10th-century Kyiv leader called Svyatoslav the Brave, announced their readiness for violence: “I come at you!”

An array of Ukrainian units, aided by civilian volunteers, threw themselves into a haphazard counterattack.

Forty-eight Ukrainian paratroopers landed in three helicopters to the southwest, while another assault team approached from the north. They used brief cellphone messages to direct artillery forces to pound Russian positions. Under assault from several angles, the Russians couldn’t safely land planes.

The counterattack had bought time. But Russian armored columns were advancing quickly by land.

Around dawn, commanders ordered Marik to pull back to a new defensive line along the Irpin River to the northwest of Kyiv. Sappers told him they were preparing to detonate the nearest bridge in 10 minutes, and couldn’t wait.

“Blow it,” Marik said. “We’ll find another way out.”
 

Citizen volunteers teamed up with soldiers to turn the tide in the most consequential European battle since World War II​


By James Marson
Follow

| Photographs by Emanuele Satolli for The Wall Street Journal
Sept. 20, 2022 10:49 am ET

Long account of how Ukranian Military and Civilians adapted and overcame extreme odds to save their country.

"KYIV—Outside the Giraffe shopping mall on the western edge of Ukraine’s capital, a group of locals prepared to meet the Russian armored column thundering their way.

It was late February, and the Russians, from an elite airborne unit, were riding atop their vehicles, as if expecting a warm greeting. One wore a Cossack woolen hat instead of a helmet. Another hadn’t loaded his rifle.

The few dozen Ukrainians from the towns of Irpin and Bucha had other intentions, which they had written on the cement mixer and bulldozer that blocked the road: “Welcome to hell.”
After Russia launched an all-out invasion on Feb. 24, a 32-year-old Ukrainian city council member and solar-power entrepreneur named Volodymyr Korotya had led preparations for a fighting stand. The men were brandishing a grab bag of weapons, including pump-action shotguns and a handful of rocket-propelled grenades. Many were dressed in jeans, and few had body armor. Around half of their number, which included a psychotherapist, a firefighter and a bus driver, had never fought before.
“Look what I do and do the same,” Mr. Korotya, who had seen combat during his time in the Ukrainian army, told the new recruit

As a vanguard of a dozen armored vehicles rumbled over the bridge between Bucha and Irpin and began to climb the hill toward them, the Ukrainians opened fire.

After a fierce three-hour battle, the Russian vehicles were destroyed or abandoned, and the soldiers were dead or in retreat. The Ukrainians set off across the bridge to finish off the rest of the column.

The Russians never crossed that bridge in their monthlong attempt to seize Kyiv.

It’s hard to know how people will react to a huge invasion force. Resistance requires a core of people in villages, towns and cities to find enough courage and motivation to fight rather than flee. Confidence in communities large and small grows with each person who stays and picks up a weapon.

That’s especially true in a country like Ukraine, whose national anthem starts: “The glory and freedom of Ukraine have not yet perished.” That line reflects the nation’s painful attempts over centuries to establish itself as an independent country in the maw of empires.

Russian President Vladimir Putin sent his army into Ukraine to snuff out its latest, 30-year attempt to establish full-fledged independence after the collapse of the Soviet Union. He had boasted that it would take only days for his powerful army to take Kyiv.

Over the next month, enough Ukrainians found the will and means to resist him. They formed armed groups with whatever weapons they could lay their hands on. They fed and equipped fighters and billeted them in their homes. They shimmied up trees in search of cellphone reception to report on enemy movements. The result looked like something little seen in modern warfare—a domestic insurgency fused onto a traditional army.

“We are like a hive of bees,” said Yaroslav Honchar, head of an attack-drone crew who make their own armed craft. “One bee is nothing, but a thousand can defeat a big force.”

To a degree not fully appreciated, it was these citizen soldiers, teaming up with active-duty personnel, who turned the tide in the most consequential battle in Europe since World War II and preserved Ukraine’s status as a sovereign nation. The defense of Kyiv allowed the president to stay and rally national support. He could also then procure the weapons from the U.S. and Europe that are now helping the army to dislodge Russian forces in the east and south.

Without Kyiv’s defenders securing crucial spots around the city in the war’s early days, none of that would have been possible.

Saving the Airport​

The Ukrainian special-forces team needed to get to Kyiv fast. But the roads from their base in western Ukraine were choked with cars heading the other way.

Civilians were panicking. Russian armored columns were streaming toward the capital from Belarus, less than 100 miles to the north. Information was scarce and often contradictory.

Marik, the team’s 32-year-old leader, focused. He needed to locate the sharpest Russian thrust toward Kyiv and figure out how his team could blunt it, he explained later, using only a pseudonym as required by Ukraine’s military.

A cyberattack had cut communications between commanders and units in the field, leaving unsecured cellphones as the only link. But Marik saw no reason to panic. He stuck to his mantra: You can’t win the war on your own; everyone has his own small front.

As the team threaded its way toward Kyiv, Marik saw videos posted online by civilians of around 30 black Russian helicopters swooping low toward the capital from the north. Their target was Antonov Airport in Hostomel, a cargo and testing airstrip about 20 miles from central Kyiv.

Marik’s commanders ordered him there. An understrength National Guard unit and another special-forces team at the airport had managed to shoot down three helicopters and hold off 200 elite paratroopers for nearly three hours before withdrawing when they ran out of ammunition. They had lost the airport but won time.

The Russians set up machine-gun nests and secured airport buildings in preparation for transport planes to land a larger force to thrust into the heart of Kyiv.

Marik had to get there and stop them. Arriving near the airport as darkness fell, he learned that others were also gunning for the Russians.

This would be no repeat of 2014, when Russian irregular fighters seized the city of Slovyansk in Ukraine’s east, igniting a war that was still simmering when Russia’s new invasion force rolled in.

Back then, when Marik was sent in to reclaim the city, his unit was equipped mostly with Soviet remnants, including metal helmets and rubber tourniquets that could snap when pulled tight. Now Marik’s men had Kevlar helmets, fitted body armor and secure American radios with headsets. Western training had helped accustom him to working autonomously in small groups. Special forces’ new motto, taken from a 10th-century Kyiv leader called Svyatoslav the Brave, announced their readiness for violence: “I come at you!”

An array of Ukrainian units, aided by civilian volunteers, threw themselves into a haphazard counterattack.

Forty-eight Ukrainian paratroopers landed in three helicopters to the southwest, while another assault team approached from the north. They used brief cellphone messages to direct artillery forces to pound Russian positions. Under assault from several angles, the Russians couldn’t safely land planes.

The counterattack had bought time. But Russian armored columns were advancing quickly by land.

Around dawn, commanders ordered Marik to pull back to a new defensive line along the Irpin River to the northwest of Kyiv. Sappers told him they were preparing to detonate the nearest bridge in 10 minutes, and couldn’t wait.

“Blow it,” Marik said. “We’ll find another way out.”

can't argue with that...
Sorry, tried to print whole article but too long. It's in today's WSJ, remarkable story of courageous citizen Soldiers defending their towns and homeland.
 
Last edited:
I grew up in that area and never heard of him until I was 50.
He defined citizen soldier, warrior, and Bad mofo.
 
Better to be armed when facing an opponent who wishes to kill you than unarmed, regardless of what liberals advise to the contrary. A basic hunting rifle will put an enemy soldier in his or her grave just as well as these much-villified "assault weapons", assuming you use an appropriate caliber to get the job done. The firearm is only a launch tube. The cartridge, and the determined defender who fires it in a well-aimed manner, kills the enemy.
 
Remember the days and weeks leading up to the invasion, Ukraine has been putting up all this social media showing the Azov Battalion training old grandmas, young teenage girls and every civilian in between with wooden AK cutouts how to defend their country. The world was supposed to be touched and everyone send troops in to help fend off the invaders. Over the last half year, did a lot of civilian women, elderly and children actually pick up arms and shoot at Russian troops or nah? Haven't been able to find any news stories about that.
 
Remember the days and weeks leading up to the invasion, Ukraine has been putting up all this social media showing the Azov Battalion training old grandmas, young teenage girls and every civilian in between with wooden AK cutouts how to defend their country. The world was supposed to be touched and everyone send troops in to help fend off the invaders. Over the last half year, did a lot of civilian women, elderly and children actually pick up arms and shoot at Russian troops or nah? Haven't been able to find any news stories about that.
Believe the SILENCE.......
 
At this point I literally don't believe any news out of Ukraine.
So what sources of information do you rely on?

Serious question. About the only news source I tend to believe in is Reuters. Twitter (and Telegram) are providing massive amounts of information, and the OSINT movement has made a significant contribution to freedom of information.

Amateur intelligence-gathering is time-consuming at best, fruitless at worst. My gut feeling is the Russian forces are a mess, but Ukrainian ammo supplies are critically low.
 
So what sources of information do you rely on?

Serious question. About the only news source I tend to believe in is Reuters. Twitter (and Telegram) are providing massive amounts of information, and the OSINT movement has made a significant contribution to freedom of information.

Amateur intelligence-gathering is time-consuming at best, fruitless at worst. My gut feeling is the Russian forces are a mess, but Ukrainian ammo supplies are critically low.
Al Jazeera English ain't bad. Just don't expect them to report anything factual regarding gulf states shit and are pretty non partisan when it comes to international affairs. BBC and RT would be good to check out in tandem just to see the two opposing sides of the story.

Deutsche Welle still lets people join in Youtube discussion comments, something a lot of Ukraine related posts by the BBC are now 'comments disabled'. Sus.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meWM4lChqy4
 
Last edited:
Remember the days and weeks leading up to the invasion, Ukraine has been putting up all this social media showing the Azov Battalion training old grandmas, young teenage girls and every civilian in between with wooden AK cutouts how to defend their country. The world was supposed to be touched and everyone send troops in to help fend off the invaders. Over the last half year, did a lot of civilian women, elderly and children actually pick up arms and shoot at Russian troops or nah? Haven't been able to find any news stories about that.
Do you train with your gun? If yes, how many bad guys have you shot?
 
So where is the American tax payer (and all the euros and british who sent them stuff) included in the tribute?
I haven't heard of any American taxpayers dying in the War, Zelensky has stated many times how grateful he and the Ukrainian people are for the weapons the West has provided them. Defeating Little Puty and his incompetent Army is priceless, worth every penny we contribute to the cause. The HIMARS system we are giving them and they are using so effectively was designed to take out an Army like Russia's. The intel we are gathering on the Operations of the Russian Army is worth it's weight in gold.
I agree with Rand Paul thou, we should have govt. officials on the ground tracking how our donated weapons are being used and where.
 
I haven't heard of any American taxpayers dying in the War

Not my point, but it’s pretty obvious they’d be pretty f***ed if not for poland, england, US and others backing them. Especially given we basically tell them where all the bad guys are. That’s not some glib thing, that’s billions worth of capability that we paid for. By the time that shitshow is over we’ll probably have dumped a shitload of money there.
 
Not my point, but it’s pretty obvious they’d be pretty f***ed if not for poland, england, US and others backing them. Especially given we basically tell them where all the bad guys are. That’s not some glib thing, that’s billions worth of capability that we paid for. By the time that shitshow is over we’ll probably have dumped a shitload of money there.
As I said Zelensky has thanked the West repeatedly for all the arms and money we have given them. When all is said and done and hopefully the Ukrainian Army is victorious in staying a free, independent country and Vlad the Incompetent Invader has suffered a sudden fatal heart attack that will be enough thanks for me.
 
I haven't heard of any American taxpayers dying in the War, Zelensky has stated many times how grateful he and the Ukrainian people are for the weapons the West has provided them. Defeating Little Puty and his incompetent Army is priceless, worth every penny we contribute to the cause. The HIMARS system we are giving them and they are using so effectively was designed to take out an Army like Russia's. The intel we are gathering on the Operations of the Russian Army is worth it's weight in gold.
I agree with Rand Paul thou, we should have govt. officials on the ground tracking how our donated weapons are being used and where.
Ukraine started integrating into NATO’s logistics system (LOGFAS) in 2018. Cooperation in many other areas was earlier. Almost everything thry are getting is in-kind equipment, not bags of cash like Afghanistan.


LOGFAS: The Logistics Functional Area Application Service delivers applications which enable the users to collect, store, manage, analyze, present and distribute information in support of logistics operations. The main processes supported are: Stockpile planning, Deployment and sustainment planning, Movement and transport of personnel and equipment, Reception, staging, onward movement and integration and Logistics reporting
 
I haven't heard of any American taxpayers dying in the War, Zelensky has stated many times how grateful he and the Ukrainian people are for the weapons the West has provided them. Defeating Little Puty and his incompetent Army is priceless, worth every penny we contribute to the cause. The HIMARS system we are giving them and they are using so effectively was designed to take out an Army like Russia's. The intel we are gathering on the Operations of the Russian Army is worth it's weight in gold.
I agree with Rand Paul thou, we should have govt. officials on the ground tracking how our donated weapons are being used and where.
Every penny we contributed ended up in some connected person's pocket, including the Big Guy.
 
it's easy to tell. its all propaganda.
After 180 days of fighting the Russians have gained just about zero territory - or is that propaganda? “Social media” is no more reliable than MSM - and this site is social media - so is everything here propaganda?

Anyone not finding reliable information about the most-reported war in history is really not trying very hard. You use this raw, unbiased information to evaluate what news sources are reporting and viola’ - you have a piece of reality.

Mistrust of both for-profit and state-run media has never been higher. And the resources to get to the core of many issues have never been better.






Russia is making the tv show “F Troop” look like a documentary.
 
Last edited:
After 180 days of fighting the Russians have gained just about zero territory - or is that propaganda? “Social media” is no more reliable than MSM - and this site is social media - so is everything here propaganda?

Anyone not finding reliable information about the most-reported war in history is really not trying very hard. You use this raw, unbiased information to evaluate what news sources are reporting and viola’ - you have a piece of reality.

Mistrust of both for-profit and state-run media has never been higher. And the resources to get to the core of many issues have never been better.






Russia is making the tv show “F Troop” look like a documentary.
Make sure you don't avoid this thread in a year when more Snake Island & Ghost of Kiev stories have come out. You know, like the vax thread.
 
Back
Top Bottom