Some reading about crime and "gun control".

[JRyan]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1440764.stm
http://www.reason.com/news/show/28582.html
http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/shared/readmore.asp?sNav=nr&id=570
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15152
http://vigilant.tv/article/2413/misleading-statistics-on-australian-gun-crime

I got this from a post on Digg.

 

[Admin]

Old report but the below is pretty shocking about LEO's

However, nearly 60 percent of respondents said they would participate in "house-to-house searches" of illegal "military-style" assault weapons if the government banned them completely, while 53 percent said they would "participate in dynamic entry, house to house searches to seize them if so ordered by a superior," if all guns were banned to private owners.

 

[JRyan]

Old report but the below is pretty shocking about LEO's

That is scary. I'm surprised, to tell the truth. I expected a better ratio in favor of not stealing and ignoring the bill or rights.

 

[Jose]

Old report but the below is pretty shocking about LEO's

I am not surprised at all.

 

[boomerang]

If everybody bought one, it would be a lot of search warrants needed to go from house to house.

 

[Jose]

If everybody bought one, it would be a lot of search warrants needed to go from house to house.

If some courts ignore the Second, what makes you think they'll respect the Fourth?

 

[C-pher]

If some courts ignore the Second, what makes you think they'll respect the Fourth?

They didn't in NOLA...

I'm sure that it would be something like that...

 

[matt1956]

sad that they think that way...