My daughters went to Beverly HS Class of 03 & 11 and they always had an armed police presence at the school.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Quasi what? Not sure where you live or grew up but we've had SRO's since the 90's.
i guess Eminem was right. Look up the lyrics to The Way I am
I think the difference is that in the cases you guys are citing the police are there to deal with the students on the inside. The NRA (and Clinton) is talking about police to protect the students from outsiders. You generally don't see police assigned to an elementary school.
"Times....they are a changin....."
Schools, people, society in general, and the dangers that now exist = are much different from even 2 or 3 decades ago.
how is someone working for a living on the .gov dole? you are already paying for LEO's - whether they make their OT for National Grid, Comcast or sitting at a school flirting with the teachers.
seriously? WTF dude? the teacher's union(s) will never allow for them to CC in New England. SRO's is the quickest and most efficient fix.
No. Allow teachers the choice of being armed or not. We don't need another quasi-police force.
They won't use existing officers. They'll hire more, thus increasing payroll. And let's not be naive, in places where they can't get new officers hired they'll make guarding the school a detail that earns overtime, not a standard pay job.
The fact remains we don't need more police. Crime rates are still dropping and have been for decades. Allowing teachers to be armed and completely eliminating "gun free zones" are the only real responses. Anything else leads towards more gun control and more treating civilians like lepers when it comes to firearms.
I meant give them a choice. I know a few teachers who would start carrying immediately. Just simply lifting the gun free school zone mandate would solve most of these occurrences. I would not support any mandate to own firearms.
They won't use existing officers. They'll hire more, thus increasing payroll. And let's not be naive, in places where they can't get new officers hired they'll make guarding the school a detail that earns overtime, not a standard pay job.
The fact remains we don't need more police. Crime rates are still dropping and have been for decades. Allowing teachers to be armed and completely eliminating "gun free zones" are the only real responses. Anything else leads towards more gun control and more treating civilians like lepers when it comes to firearms.
.
The TSA will fit this bill nicely.
When I went to Jr. High at Normandin in New Bedford, Armed police on school grounds were there daily and were routine. That was a rough rough school in my time...
Well back in my day there was a group of us that took our .22 rifles to school with us because we would go shoot after school at the gravel pit behind the school (who wanted to walk all the way back home after school to get your rifle and then walk all the way back to school to shoot?) So if some maniac came into the school to shoot the place up he would have been confronted by an army of 10 year olds shooting back and some of us were pretty darn good shots. But I guess the little "snowflakes" now-a-days are to sensitive for anything like that.
The only problem I have is that most shooter plan their event and will likely know who the "guards" are and their routine. They will be the first ones shot. This is why there must be more folks in the school with CC and trained.I live in what is considered a "safe" town with not a lot of serious crime. We have had a Policeman in our high school for the last 10 years or so. No big deal, no big concerns, no big problems, our tax dollars pay for him to be there.
The only problem I have is that most shooter plan their event and will likely know who the "guards" are and their routine. They will be the first ones shot. This is why there must be more folks in the school with CC and trained.
Well back in my day there was a group of us that took our .22 rifles to school with us because we would go shoot after school at the gravel pit behind the school (who wanted to walk all the way back home after school to get your rifle and then walk all the way back to school to shoot?) So if some maniac came into the school to shoot the place up he would have been confronted by an army of 10 year olds shooting back and some of us were pretty darn good shots. But I guess the little "snowflakes" now-a-days are to sensitive for anything like that.
The NRA is STUPID to suggest putting armed cops in schools.....
But Bill Clinton was brilliant to suggest the same thing
http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-co...-in-schools-because-of-columbine-2546306.html
The last paragraph in the article cited below is for Clinton's call for 60 million $ for 452 police officers in schools. Do the math gang. A dimocrat wanted $132,743.00 per cop for 180 days work!
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ols-forgets-bill-clinton-proposed-same-thing/
"Clinton also unveiled the $60-million fifth round of funding for “COPS in School,” a Justice Department program that helps pay the costs of placing police officers in schools to help make them safer for students and teachers. The money will be used to provide 452 officers in schools in more than 220 communities."
Republican critics said the federal government is a clumsy middleman in trying to cope with problems that should be addressed locally.