JimConway
Instructor
We all have an idea of the perfect self defense handgun. For me it is a 1911. One problem with our idea is that much of the basis of the idea is based upon square range shooting or the ramblings of the various gun mags. For years I felt the Sig handguns were not an ideal choise for self defense, base, mostly on the long trigger reset. I mentioned this to police officer that was in our Jeff Gonzales class. At the time the class was finishing up a square box drill.
The squarebox drill is conducted by marking the corners of a rectangle about 15 yards on a side with one of the sides about 5 yards from 4 targets. This drill was to be shot while moving with the shooter moving along each of the 4 sides of the rectangle with 1 shot to each target while moving in each direction for a total of 16 shots. Even the reloads and MALFs were to be done while moving.
The police officer suggested that I shoot the drill again with his Sig 226, a gun that I had never fired before. I then shot the drill and afterwards thought that I had never noticed to reset at all. I was surprised and it made me start to think. The police officer told me afterward that I had gotten A hits on all of the targets and I was even more surprised.
I have rambled on for a bit and by now you are wondering what I am getting at. The message for me was that I had to rethink my approach to selecting a defense handgun. In this case, a gun that I had ruled out performed flawlessly. How could this be?
For me I will now evaluate a defense handgun by testing it using things that could happen in a confrontation and not just the square range.
This is just food for thought. All commenbts are very welcome.
The squarebox drill is conducted by marking the corners of a rectangle about 15 yards on a side with one of the sides about 5 yards from 4 targets. This drill was to be shot while moving with the shooter moving along each of the 4 sides of the rectangle with 1 shot to each target while moving in each direction for a total of 16 shots. Even the reloads and MALFs were to be done while moving.
The police officer suggested that I shoot the drill again with his Sig 226, a gun that I had never fired before. I then shot the drill and afterwards thought that I had never noticed to reset at all. I was surprised and it made me start to think. The police officer told me afterward that I had gotten A hits on all of the targets and I was even more surprised.
I have rambled on for a bit and by now you are wondering what I am getting at. The message for me was that I had to rethink my approach to selecting a defense handgun. In this case, a gun that I had ruled out performed flawlessly. How could this be?
For me I will now evaluate a defense handgun by testing it using things that could happen in a confrontation and not just the square range.
This is just food for thought. All commenbts are very welcome.