Baker is as exciting as watching molasses go up hill! Fisher got screwed! He is not part of the gop establishment plain and simple! Vote for Baker and then find out what he stands for. What a joke!!!!!!!
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
I guess you didn't understand my post :/
I never said I support Baker ! I said he is the LESSER OF 2 EVILS ! Lesser of 2 evils is all we're going to get in this state !
Baker is a POS but if it's a choice between him and Coakley , I'll vote for him .
What should we do ? What are you going to do ? Stay home / not vote and let the wacko liberal democrat hacks win every time .
If you don't vote you have no right to complain ! If you don't vote you are part of the problem .
Enjoy your shit sandwich if/when Coakley wins .
BTW , I'd rather have Romney than Patrick . Wouldn't you ??????
I'm not sure which planet your on?? Is Fisher going be on the ballot? Probably not. I'll write him in, but he's not going to win, and if enough Repubs write him in it'll just give Marsha a better win. How's that for ya?
Either way, we all eat shit, no matter what.....
So let me ask you this... Do you feel like you are still in the land of the free when you are only allowed to vote between candidates who wish to infringe on your rights and they squash out the little guy who stands for something. Going along with this is not going to help any of us short or long term.
Part of the problem is the people have been conditioned to vote for who they dislike the least and not who actually stands for something. Personally I have a position in my RCC. I was helping push Mark along as much as I could while my friend Dan Allie is battling in the special election for state rep. So yes I do vote, I was an organizer for the 4/19 West Springfield Rally last year, I meet with chiefs and other LEOs, I do stand outs and utilize our protect our children and the second amendment banner, do door to door, get nomination papers signed, get push cards and citizens petitions out to ranges and shops. I'm sure I missed some but I'm sure you get the idea. The point is that no one should be willing to knowingly accept a traitor who campaigns on violating the rights of another. Hey if a D wants to run based off hand outs then so be it BUT as soon as they utilize infringing on anothers rights they should be called out on it and it should not be tolerated. The same goes for the other side of the aisle and Baker needs to be called out for it and he should not be patronized for his anti constitution views and should be DQ from even running based off that alone. When it comes to what I will come election day I will with out question be out there with signs for at least Dan. When I step in to the booth I will most likely write in Fisher. What I can tell you I will not do with out question is fill in next to Baker, Marsha or any other demorat. I will not provide validity to the shit that the two major parties have created and continue to cram down our throats.
If anything I would rather see Marsha in there rather than Baker. Why you ask? Because we know she sucks and is exactly the POS that she makes her self out to be. Baker on the other hand is a polished turd. Letting this states demise fall on both parties because Baker can't stand for anything will not help the GOP. Romney taxed the ever living **** out of us (Oops I mean fees). He brought us romneycare and bashed obamacare (same ****ing thing). Romney also is anti 2A and actively seeks to infringe so what was good about him and what did he do to help the citizens of Mass? What spending did he reign in? Did those fee increases work? What about the RMV fees that are going up again? He fed the beast in order to play. Instead as Fisher says and is true allow the demorats to own all the problems of this state. Allowing them to shift blame because you're seeking a 4 or 8 yr slow down of the decline isn't going to help much if any in the long run and may only hurt.
Am I wrong?
So because I refuse to support a shit bag anti freedom, anti constitution GOP politician I am on another planet? It's better to write him in and actually stand for something then to validate the broken system. I'm fine with Marsha winning when it comes to someone like Baker. Let the rats own the problems and let's not muddy the waters. Look at what people in CT did with the registration.... they said enough is enough. Everyone is too scared to do that when it comes time to voting and they play the game that's already rigged against them. Imagine if all these people who settle for the lesser of two evils said **** it and refused to validate the flawed system. Then it could open up the voter fraud abuse etc. But going along with the ride is not helping at this point.
Not what i meant. I understand you not voting for Baker. Nor will I. But we are all going to enjoy a shit sandwich was my point....no matter how you vote.
I certainly understand voting on principle...and we are on the same page because im not voting for Baker either. The system is broken at this point and there is no one i feel that will represent me on the ballot
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The theme of this thread is exactly what is killing the republicans. It's the fight between the 'hard-liners' and those who offer what they think is a marginal improvement over the left. (that is my opinion, not a judgment.) the problem is that the tea party conservatives don't offer a robust set of solutions either, IMHO( particularly in the realm of foreign policy, which cannot be ignored, as we have seen recently).
I am not a Republican. I have never enrolled. This leaves me free to be disgusted with all candidates, and it makes voting hard.
My confusion on this issue, particularly so in MA, is that the people running as Republicans in MA don't even tow the ostensible party line wrt principles. Meanwhile, when the left does have a primary, it offers a ridiculously progressive person and a 'moderate', and typically elects the progressive after arguing that the moderate has sold the party out by limiting giveaways.
I tend towards libertarian/radical conservatism, so my views have a few contradictions themselves, but I really do find it hard to see as legitimate a Republican candidate who is only slightly less bad than the progressive candidate.
I understand those that are frustrated with the current bullshit system. But one thing I know for sure is that we CANNOT tolerate 4+ years of Marsha as gov..
For those bashing Baker, from what are you basing your claims that he's a RINO? I'm not supporting him, just an honest question. I haven't seen or heard anything from him to have any opinions.
With that being said, I understand those that are frustrated with the current bullshit system. But one thing I know for sure is that we CANNOT tolerate 4+ years of Marsha as gov..
Both Fisher and Baker were actively recruiting delegates.
You guys needed to go to a convention to figure out the Republican Party is a joke? Seriously?
For those bashing Baker, from what are you basing your claims that he's a RINO? I'm not supporting him, just an honest question. I haven't seen or heard anything from him to have any opinions.
With that being said, I understand those that are frustrated with the current bullshit system. But one thing I know for sure is that we CANNOT tolerate 4+ years of Marsha as gov..
FWIW I am Unerolled, but I am working for a Republican Stat Rep. campaign.Which they are supposed to do. what I'm saying is that the higher ups in the Mass GOP were also pushing delegates to vote for Baker. They didn't sit back and allow the candidates to do the work, they were working for Baker as well. That's not right.