Ma GOP wants your opinion.

Total aside, but be glad you are in MA and not RI. That crazy s-bird Gina Raimando scares me. I'm hoping she decides to run for higher office. She's a Socialist that is espousing some Capitalist ideal on the state level in order to make things work in her ass-backwards state. But her preference is for SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER federal taxes and more social programs. But none on the State side - because a higher income tax in RI will spell doom for her next re-election. LOL

I'll take Faker over her.

That's like saying 'do you want a pail of shit to eat, or a bucket of shit to eat? You're still eating shit

Of course, with Governor Dimples, you're eating a wheelbarrel full of shit, while being simultaneously disarmed, pick-pocketed and cornholed.
 
The ‘advantage’ (if you can call it that) to dimples is that it will force all the wishy washy FUDDs to pick a side, and hurry up and get us to the point they are all aiming for in this state.

I am of the mindset - GET ON WITH IT
 
That's like saying 'do you want a pail of shit to eat, or a bucket of shit to eat? You're still eating shit

Of course, with Governor Dimples, you're eating a wheelbarrel full of shit, while being simultaneously disarmed, pick-pocketed and cornholed.

With Dimples, perhaps a shitnado....

 
So , has anyone heard if Polito will be making the rounds of the gun clubs this time around telling us how pro 2A she is ?
Another lying sack of shit .
 
Total aside, but be glad you are in MA and not RI. That crazy s-bird Gina Raimando scares me. I'm hoping she decides to run for higher office. She's a Socialist that is espousing some Capitalist ideal on the state level in order to make things work in her ass-backwards state. But her preference is for SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER federal taxes and more social programs. But none on the State side - because a higher income tax in RI will spell doom for her next re-election. LOL

I'll take Faker over her.

Looks like one of Maura's friends..... Wink! Wink![banana]
 
My message to the MA GOP (oxymoron) is Grow a Pair and stand up for your supporters and members. Make some noise about Constitutional Rights. Put some pressure on the POS AG who thinks she knows what's best for me and she has never even met or read my letters to her (read by office lackey). Take that stick out of Fbaker's ass, it not the same as a back bone.

Actually I think we all should start our own party . . . The GAP (Guns and Ammo Party). If we rally all the gun owners, I think we could get a pretty high number . . . and if we could get EVERYONE to vote, that could be something!

(*snort#*Umph*) I/m sorry I fell asleep there for a second . . . but I was having the weirdest dream . . . .
 
I am more of a Libertarian, at least I thought I was until the last election. I had always supported them, hoped that they could somehow grow into a popular party. And then, 2016 happened. Gary Johnson was bad enough, but a gun banning Republican Liberal as the VP pushed me over the edge. Sadly, all parties are corrupt, I see it no other way. I haven't supported the Libertarian Party since and nor will I. I have told them that, not that they care about me. The "braintrust" that allowed the Johnson/Weld Ticket is still in control today so I saw a Libertarian Party, LINO, if you will, and said screw them, they are done. Frankly I don't see how the party survives the debacle of the 2016 ticket.

Not quite ready to jump ship yet. I agree with your assessment of Johnson/Weld, and the libertarian party leadership, however my vote was for the party. It doesn't matter who is heading it when they won't win, but getting them 5% would have been nice. Probably would have happened without Johnson/Weld as well.

Mike
 
Nothing to add that hasn't already been covered, but I would like to applaud the forum members for one of the most entertaining threads in quite some time. Way to go NES! LOL...

:emoji_thumbsup::emoji_thumbsup::emoji_thumbsup:

p.s. Would I get in trouble if I ask Polito to guess the size of my bump stock?
AR-170609453.jpg&MaxH=225&MaxW=225
 
Lolz. I told them to stop being cuck f@gg@ts. Miserable little failures but the way forward is to take over the state GOP. Trump the surrender queers in their own club. Of course no one, including me, wants to do the work and put up with the whining boomerfags. But we should start pushing them out, and be in place when they age out. Or it will just be more SJWRs.
 
I may have a chance to meet with someone from the Baker campaign this Friday night. Going to try to give him/her a "polite" summary of how gun owners feel about Baker and Polito and the gun issue..
 
I got some sort of survey via email. I stopped at the first question because they wanted my name, address, and other information. I get enough junk mail as it is. They don't want our opinions nearly as much as they want donations. Which they won't get from me. Nor will Deval Baker. He's as bad on every other issue as he is on the 2A.

Refuses to acknowledge the President, who is a Republican. Refuses to say anything that will offend any Democrat. Kisses Liz Warrens ass.

There is no measurable difference between him and Deval Patrick, or Martha Coakley for that matter.
 
Told them that they let AG Healey trample all over 2nd amendment rights and they didn't do anything about it. That lost them my support.
 
I may have a chance to meet with someone from the Baker campaign this Friday night. Going to try to give him/her a "polite" summary of how gun owners feel about Baker and Polito and the gun issue..
Just don't let them off the hook when they spew the "No , No, he really respects the second amendment. " horse shit.
That ship sailed a while back.
 
Unfortunately, because of the nature of the anticipated meeting I have to behave.
No need to be rude, just persistent .;)
It's fun to watch people twist and squirm.
I would even pose it in the form of a question.
"I'm curious as to what reason you might give to the state's 400 thousand plus gun owners to vote for Governor Baker a second time ? "
 
Well, we had the meeting and the guy did show up. He is a young guy and one of maybe 20 (?, he was not sure since they were still organizing) people working on the Baker-Polito re-election staff. Most of what we were doing tonight was getting ourselves organized and finding out what was happening in the near future on the Republican side of the upcoming election preparations.

After most of that was settled he asked if we had any questions. That's when I spoke up.

"What is the Baker strategy for getting the roughly 400,000 law-abiding gun owners to vote for him again in this election?"

I emphasized that we voted for him once before based on his and Polito's claimed support of the 2A, what Healy did to us over the AR-15 "copy-cat" issue, the speed with which the Legislature produced, voted on, and passed the bump stock bill (especially after they told us after Healy's move that they could not produce a bill in less than a year), and that as a Representative, Polito was one of the most vocal pro-gun legislators we had.

To his credit he did not duck the issue but said that one of his jobs was to bring back concerns such as this to the staff. He said that they had already had comments such as this and were discussing it but that it is the campaign advisors who have the most insight into these issues and how they will address them.

There were five of us locals with him at the meeting and all five were very pro-gun so we were able to project a united front on this. We were able to keep it friendly and asked him to let us know how this went when he got back to Boston.
 
Well, we had the meeting and the guy did show up. He is a young guy and one of maybe 20 (?, he was not sure since they were still organizing) people working on the Baker-Polito re-election staff. Most of what we were doing tonight was getting ourselves organized and finding out what was happening in the near future on the Republican side of the upcoming election preparations.

After most of that was settled he asked if we had any questions. That's when I spoke up.

"What is the Baker strategy for getting the roughly 400,000 law-abiding gun owners to vote for him again in this election?"

I emphasized that we voted for him once before based on his and Polito's claimed support of the 2A, what Healy did to us over the AR-15 "copy-cat" issue, the speed with which the Legislature produced, voted on, and passed the bump stock bill (especially after they told us after Healy's move that they could not produce a bill in less than a year), and that as a Representative, Polito was one of the most vocal pro-gun legislators we had.

To his credit he did not duck the issue but said that one of his jobs was to bring back concerns such as this to the staff. He said that they had already had comments such as this and were discussing it but that it is the campaign advisors who have the most insight into these issues and how they will address them.

There were five of us locals with him at the meeting and all five were very pro-gun so we were able to project a united front on this. We were able to keep it friendly and asked him to let us know how this went when he got back to Boston.

Translated : We are working on a line of bullshit to make it look like the screwing we gave you wasn't actually a screwing .

Thanks for asking the question.
No matter what they say , it's got to be a concern for them.
He got that seat by less than 40 thousand votes WITH gun owners support.
They can pretend 400 thousand won't make a difference if they want.
 
Pissing off a part of your voting base is stupid. Having that base say publicly that the MA GOP can go to Hell is a loosing formula for certain.

Baker and the MA GOP have lost a substancial voting block in MA and I think that they know it (but aren't ready to acknowledge it).

The old lesser of two evils bullshit isn't going to fly in the next election for Baker.
 
Translated : We are working on a line of bullshit to make it look like the screwing we gave you wasn't actually a screwing .

Thanks for asking the question.
No matter what they say , it's got to be a concern for them.
He got that seat by less than 40 thousand votes WITH gun owners support.
They can pretend 400 thousand won't make a difference if they want.

My gut feeling is that it IS a concern. But in this state I think that defending the 2A is a strategy designed to give the Dems an easy issue to attack on. Do I like that? No. But I have to acknowledge that dynamic.

Pissing off a part of your voting base is stupid. Having that base say publicly that the MA GOP can go to Hell is a loosing formula for certain.

Baker and the MA GOP have lost a substancial voting block in MA and I think that they know it (but aren't ready to acknowledge it).

The old lesser of two evils bullshit isn't going to fly in the next election for Baker.

With a 74% (?) approval rating they may think it's worth the gamble. Baker does not make any attacks on our rights, he just does not defend them. The next Democratic Governor probably would declare each one of us as potential mass-murderers and try to round us up. Maybe that's a bit of an exaggeration but there are too many people in this state who would be okay with that.
 
With a 74% (?) approval rating they may think it's worth the gamble. Baker does not make any attacks on our rights, he just does not defend them. The next Democratic Governor probably would declare each one of us as potential mass-murderers and try to round us up. Maybe that's a bit of an exaggeration but there are too many people in this state who would be okay with that.[/QUOTE]

Maybe among democrats. Wasn't it Harry Truman who once said that if you give people a choice between a democrat and a democrat they'll always pick the democrat? At the end off the day, the MA GOP has to admit (at least to themselves) that they have alienated a substancial voting block.
 
Back
Top Bottom