Again, you are making stuff up. Stop doing that.
If you owned 100 acres of land and your town didn't have a no-discharge ordinance, you could shoot legally, and you wouldn't need any other permit to do so.
Eastern MA is densely populated and very liberal. As a result, you can't find many locations where you are not close to other houses.
Since your license is issued at the discretion of your chief of police (and can be revoked by him at will), you really want to consider carefully where you go shooting -- it might be legal, but if the police get pissed off, you might lose your LTC. That is not the same as being illegal.
There are very few places in eastern MA where you can just walk into the woods and shoot. And if someone knows of such a place, they are highly unlikely to post in a public forum about it, as next weekend 50 people would show up and before long you wouldn't be able to shoot there.
First off, I am not now, nor have I ever been a liar.
I am not making shit up.
Am I un/misinformed, yes, you've made that abundantly clear by how much it flusters you. But there is a huge difference between those two things, and one is an attack on my character and is hardly appropriate. Set me straight, but please don't ever imply that I'm a liar.
Secondly, if you'll recall, I prefaced this entire conversation with the fact that this was "purely academic".
Implying that this was a theoretical or hypothetical conversation; not practical, realistic, or implying that anything i posted would be directly factual.
So to clarify and be abundantly clear, I am "not" a firearms attorney, I do "not" possess a map of every city and town in eastern massachusetts discharge ordinances, nor have I committed the convoluted and mystifying MGL's to memory.
So please, relax and give a guy a little leeway will ya!
Back to academia:
I don't own any property, so that's not an option. Besides, its again not public and its exclusionary based on income.
But if I'm reading you right, (and correct me if I'm wrong)
If I were to find a town with no laws forbidding the discharge of a firearm, and I can machete myself miles enough into the back woods lugging all my gear, I could "legally" shoot there and not go to prison.
But irregardless of the legality of that action the scenario still potentially could cost me the ability to own and carry firearms forever..
So in that light, my statement that you say is made up seems 'effectively' true. And i say that only because despite its being legal here and there, due to discretionary dispensation the outcome/punishment could effectively be the same as shooting illegally.
--------
I absolutely love the suggestion of making a sticky post of clubs that allow reactive targets/plates/gongs etc.