Gun 'bullies' spread fear in Augusta

Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
21
Likes
0
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
This should get the blood pressure up..... [shock]



Gun 'bullies' spread fear in Augusta

She knows that simply asking the question is enough to set them off. But Cathie Whittenburg, executive director of Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence, can't help herself.

"What ever happened to civility?" Whittenburg asked Tuesday as her group's legislative agenda - or what's left of it - limped toward the end of the session. "There's a level of anger here that you don't see with other bills. And these people, you know, are armed!"

Responsible gun owners, step away from your computer keyboards. Whittenburg is the first to acknowledge that the nasty e-mails and telephone messages surrounding Maine's never-ending debate over firearms come not from mainstream hunters or target shooters or collectors. Rather, she blames them on "the bullies" who attack anything they consider a threat to their beloved Second Amendment.

But lately, those bullies have Whittenburg worried. Last week's story out of Augusta - that state Sen. Ethan Strimling, D-Portland, had forwarded three pieces of hate mail to the Attorney General's Office, including one from the "No Warning Headshot Photo Lab for Freedom" - is but one example of what Whittenburg calls a stepped-up offensive against anyone who dares submit a bill containing the word "firearm." (Strimling apparently put himself in the cross hairs by proposing that Maine adopt a statewide ban on assault weapons.)

"It's really unfortunate for people who are brave enough to sponsor these bills," Whittenburg said. "If your name is on a (firearms) bill, you get slammed."

"Absolutely," agreed Rep. Margaret Craven, D-Lewiston, during a break at the State House. It wasn't long after she submitted a bill last January calling for a 10-day waiting period on firearms sales to anyone younger than 22, Craven said, that she began getting cryptic calls and e-mails telling her, "You're going to be sorry you did this."

Granted, that could mean her bill, which by Tuesday had been watered down almost beyond recognition, could cost Craven re-election. Or it could mean something else.

"I grew up in Ireland, where you get very sensitive to threats and anything involving weapons," said Craven. When the first threats began showing up on her phone machine and computer last winter, she said, "I became very concerned. I remember thinking, 'Gee, I even have these legislative plates on my car . . .' "

Rep. Deborah Pelletier-Simpson, D-Auburn, knows the feeling. She sponsored a bill this session that would tax firearm sales and use the money to improve security in Maine's courthouses. As a victim of domestic violence six years ago, Pelletier-Simpson knew firsthand what it's like to sit in the courthouse lobby afraid that all hell might break loose.

Earlier in the session, Pelletier-Simpson's response to one nasty e-mail about her bill (the tax part has been stripped out, she said, while the rest of the proposal is "on life support") found its way to an ultra-conservative Web site. She came home from a weekend away to find her answering machine full of messages - all from men, all screaming, all saying "I had no right to represent people. I should resign my office . . . "

"They were all kind of veiled threats," said Pelletier-Simpson. "By the time I finished listening, I was in tears. It was frightening."

Then there's Rep. Carole Grose, D-Woolwich, who co-sponsored Strimling's assault-weapons bill - but isn't sure she'd do it again.

The bill died before a legislative committee on Friday - yet Grose's telephone rang every 15 minutes all weekend ("Sometimes I listened. Other times I just held the phone out and let them go.") and her e-mail inbox was still smoking as late as Monday night.

"One of them called me an 'enemy of the country,' " Grose said, adding that by the time she had waded through the page-and-a-half diatribe, "I felt like I had a target on my back."

"For what we get paid up here, it's not worth it to me," said Grose. "How do I know there isn't some radical person out there who's actually going to do something?"

It's not a rhetorical question. Whittenburg, of Maine Citizens Against Handgun Violence, has a story in her news archives about 20-year-old Michael Breit of Illinois, who in November was convicted of illegally receiving explosive materials with intent to kill, injure or intimidate people.

It seems Breit accidentally discharged his AK-47 in his apartment a year ago, and police who responded found a hit list of public figures who were, he later told police, "marked to die" for their liberal or anti-gun views.

"I truly believe we're talking about a minority here," Whittenburg said. "But it can be a real threat."

That's exactly what Strimling thought when he forwarded his hate mail to the AG's office last week. The postcard from the "No Warning Headshot Photo Lab for Freedom" not only called him a "treasonous Jew," he said, but it also ended with the words, "Triangulation squad at hearing on Monday 10 a.m. In your face debate, traitor."

"I didn't get it until after the hearing," Strimling said. "Had I gotten it before, I probably wouldn't have gone."


Columnist Bill Nemitz can be contacted at 791-6323 or at: [email protected]
 
Marcus in the Darkus said:
Amazing that only one of the three women they quoted had a hyphenated last name. :?

[lol] [lol] [lol] That's because the other two are lesbian.
 
I "threaten" politicians all the time. But I make a REAL "threat", more like a PROMISE.

"Do what the people want, or you're out of office."

"If you vote for this, I'll work against your reelection."
 
I have no love for these Legislators who continually introduce Bills to infringe on my Second Ammendment rights. That being said, any fool who threatens these Legislators with bodily harm is doing way more harm than good. We don't want your help.
 
PatMcD said:
I have no love for these Legislators who continually introduce Bills to infringe on my Second Ammendment rights. That being said, any fool who threatens these Legislators with bodily harm is doing way more harm than good. We don't want your help.

I hope you weren't referring to me. I wouldn't threaten physical violence on anybody, especially a politician. One, it's illegal and just plain WRONG. Two, it only justifies the politicians view of the situation. My idea of a "threat" goes something like: "Senator, I'd like to vote for you when you are up for reelection, but, unless your point of view towards criminals and victim self defense changes, I can not do so with a clear conscience."
 
I'm positive he wasn't referring to you. He was referring to the asshat that made the threats to the Liberal Senator in ME.
 
Back
Top Bottom