Actually, I attempting to use humor to avoid pointing out that your ravings were those of a paranoid conspiracy-theorist who believes everything he reads on a website. My error.
Oh bullshit. At least man up and admit that you attempted to marginalize what I wrote by posting your goofy little sign. What? You couldn't just come out and say that it is your belief that I am a
"raving" "paranoid conspiracy-theorist who believes everything >he< reads on a website?" Hey! If that wrinkles your socks then I say go for it.
Trust me, I am not a delicate little flower and truth be told, I rather enjoy it when ill-informed people like yourself go into attack mode armed with nothing but your d...err...irrational emotions. I tend to destroy my chew toys and it just makes me happy when people like you offer yourselves up as a new replacement.
Do you think I haven't heard it all before? Do you think your method of attack is original? I hate to pop your balloon, but you're methods are no different from any others of your ilk. That being said, I still like the squeaky sounds my chew toys make.
The American Policy Center, for Christ-sake? In December '08 they wrote: That's their emphasis, BTW, not mine.
"...one state away from total destruction?" Really? No, that's not sky-is-falling hyperbole. You read any of their other stuff? About how the UN is infiltrating our public education?
How about this? Instead of throwing a little hissy fit over his choice of words, why don't you try to dispute the fact that we are
two states away from calling a Con Con?
That is the statement you took issue with when you began posting about tin foil hats. You took issue with the statement that we are 2 states away from calling a Constitutional Convention. Remember that?
You disputed the statement NOT by posting verifiable evidence to the contrary, but rather, you made a weak-minded attempt to ridicule the messenger. Furthermore, you did that without first attempting to do any honest research as to the veracity of my claims. In other words, you had no contradictory evidence which caused you to "
think" that what I wrote was wrong. The only information you had at your disposal were your "
feeeelings," and your "
feeelings" convinced
you that the statement was wrong.
I'm sorry, as I'm a bit slow and must have missed it. What were the 32 states who have called for a Constitutional Convention?
Oh no you don't. Don't even think for a moment that I am going to do your work for you,
especially after you tried to marginalize me with your pathetic attempts to label me a "raving, paranoid conspiracy-theorist" in a tin foil hat. If you had shown a genuine interest in educating yourself I would have gladly offered the information. But you didn't do that so now your just my new chew toy. Do your own homework.
If you peel even one layer off the onion, you find out that all the medial hype in the Blogosphere (WorldNetDaily, St Louis Gun Rights Examiner, etc.) circles back to quoting the above website as their source. It all tracks down to one place, and one guy, Tom DeWeese.
No. It doesn't. You think it does, but that's just because you're ill-informed and worse, you're too lazy to research anything beyond what I have provided you.
As a side note, if, in fact, we were just two small votes away from the first Constitutional Convention since 1787, aimed at throwing out the Constitution, do you think your vehicle for receiving this information would be some obscure website run out of some guy's basement?
No. But it's obvious to me that
you do.
This doesn't strike you as something that might be...oh, I don't know...newsworthy?
I think the fact that the presidency is being occupied by a usurper is news worthy. I think the fact that our troops fought and won a war in Iraq is news worthy. I think the fact that the usurper associates with known terrorists is news worthy. I think the fact that a close campaign adviser to the usurper was holding secret meetings with Hamas, a world recognized terrorist group, and reporting back to the usurper is news worthy. I think that the usurper's plan to help Hamas terrorists and their sympathizers emigrate to the US at tax payer expense is newsworthy. I think the fact that Islamic military training camps are operating within this country is newsworthy. I think the fact that our nation will be bankrupt in a few short years is news worthy. But do you see the so-called "main stream" media reporting on any of that?
There's not some news guy somewhere who may think, "Hey, we're just two votes away from completely throwing out the Constitution...I wonder if anyone would think this of interest...?" Of course not in the MSM, I'm sure they're in on it. But maybe somebody? Fox? Reuters? Obscure Sports Quarterly? Is this impending disaster completely unnoticed by the entire news establishment?
You may think you're being clever by posting what you obviously "
feeeeel" is a rhetorical question, but humor me while I answer it. The answer to your question is, no. It has not gone unnoticed by the "news establishment." It has simply gone unnoticed by you. Just because
you were not aware of it until yesterday, doesn't mean many others who get their information from
more than one website aren't aware of it.
You know, your persuasive argument, and those of the American Policy Center, have changed my mine. It is URGENT! If, as the OP stated, I don't call in to the radio debate (on the Superstation WGN) on repealing the Second Amendment and speak my mind, The Republic is doomed. Doomed, I say. Just...doomed.
Here's whats going to doom us, that trillion dollar spending spree your boy is attempting to ram down our throats. When deficits and national debt expands without restraint, and when suddenly fiscal matters are described in terms of trillions rather than billions, you have a trajectory that is unsustainable. Given the Usurper's current spending path, the interest on the national debt by 2019 alone will be $806
billion. That interest figure is more than what will be spent on national defense. Our national debt is on a path to reach $10 trillion, an unsustainable amount.
THAT'S what's going to doom us. But hey! You can keep living in your dream world of "hope and change." But just remember this, I'm not the one wearing the tin foil hat.