If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Which creates the interesting situation in which a Floridian with a resident FL permit visiting NH may have more protection from the GFSZ law than a NH resident with a NH permit. This can be harder than figuring out the tax implications of gay marriage from another state.
wow talk about "carry gun freely" zone. i assume open carry would be no problem?Then move to NH, where it's legal to carry inside the school building itself.
wrap it in an adult diaper and hold it out at arms length that way any BG wont target your trunk, then preemptively pee on yourself and make sure to carry your rape whistle with you. according to liberals this will make it safer than carrying a gun.Stupid question - What are your tactics for removing your carry from your holster and placing it the case in the trunk? Someone's always watching so how does one avoid "brandishing"
If I were in a situation where I had to place my carry in the trunk, I would do so in a spot other than where I intend on parking. Little too much? NYC tactic...why let the thieves see you place your laptop in the trunk as you go to Starbucks.
...a Floridian with a resident FL permit visiting NH may have more protection from the GFSZ law than a NH resident with a NH permit.
18 USC 922 said:(2)(A) It shall be unlawful for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm that has moved in or that otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone.
(B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to the possession of a firearm—
>snip<
(ii) if the individual possessing the firearm is licensed to do so by the State in which the school zone is located or a political subdivision of the State...
Actually that's another gray array: The federal law has no acknowledgement of reciprocity. It says "if the individual possessing the firearm is licensed to do so by the State in which the school zone is located or a political subdivision of the State, and the law of the State or political subdivision requires that, before an individual obtains such a license, the law enforcement authorities of the State or political subdivision verify that the individual is qualified under law to receive the license"Which creates the interesting situation in which a Floridian with a resident FL permit visiting NH may have more protection from the GFSZ law than a NH resident with a NH permit. This can be harder than figuring out the tax implications of gay marriage from another state.
Actually a town ordinance performing the designation to full-time police officer (or the sheriff for towns without a police force) as contemplated by RSA 159:6, would probably bring them into federal compliance based on the "or laws of the political subdivision" clause.More interesting is the fact that since NR NH Licenses are only issued by NH SP, therefore the NR Licenses DO meet the minimum requirements under federal law. So we have more protection than a NH Resident!!
No one would. Conceal the damn thing, and be quiet about it.
Ideally, yeah. But what if you pass out from an undiagnosed arrhythmia or seizure? What if some punk out of nowhere smacks you in the back of the head with a brick? What if you fall down a flight of stairs and either get knocked out or break your femur and can't walk? You'll get carried off by EMS, your firearm gets found, and you are now a PP for life. Is it right? Nope, not in my book. Is it worth the risk? Not in my book, either.