Biden administration closing 'gun show loophole'
The Biden administration on Thursday announced they are closing what is often known as the "gun show loophole."
abcnews.go.com
Hmm.....wonder what this new language will be....
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
The worse thing is that it's probably here to stay. I don't see a Republican President reversing it...The Biden administration on Thursday announced they are closing what is often known as the "gun show loophole," by tightening up the definition of what it means to be "engaged in the business" of selling firearms.
This will determine what happens. If the new rule is one sale and you are engaged then it would effectively end any private sale of firearms. Maybe there is an arbitrary limit, like in MA. Sell X guns are you are in the business. All I know is that it won't be good for the private sitizen looking to sell a firearm to a legal person.
I appreciate it. Gotta love the government, 466 pages of nonsense.Here's the official ATF page, with link to the text of the final rule as signed by the Attorney General:
Final Rule: Definition of “Engaged in the Business” as a Dealer in Firearms | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
On April 10, 2024, the Attorney General signed ATF’s final rule, Definition of “Engaged in the Business” as a Dealer in Firearms, amending ATF’s regulations in title 27, Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”), part 478. The final rule implements the provisions of the Bipartisan Safer Communities...www.atf.gov
The worse thing is that it's probably here to stay. I don't see a Republican President reversing it...
Why does Garland have such a punchable face?
All you need is a table at a gun show and one gun sold. That’s enough.The Biden administration on Thursday announced they are closing what is often known as the "gun show loophole," by tightening up the definition of what it means to be "engaged in the business" of selling firearms.
This will determine what happens. If the new rule is one sale and you are engaged then it would effectively end any private sale of firearms. Maybe there is an arbitrary limit, like in MA. Sell X guns are you are in the business. All I know is that it won't be good for the private sitizen looking to sell a firearm to a legal person.
He's the picked on school wimp that now has power. He missed this ad:Not just his face, he has those weak trout shoulders and slouched posture, looks like a cuck. Like if you showed him a fist he'd piss himself.
That’s better.Republicans are just useless at this point.
EntrapmentI appreciate it. Gotta love the government, 466 pages ofnonsense.
Says the same guy who says he can’t stop immigration who has no problems stomping on the legal rights of real citizens.It would seem that the EO will/would ban ALL private firearm sales.
Again, the Left has no issue with EO, from a President that can make no laws, especially ones that take away Constitutionally protected rights.
As many times as Mitch has betrayed us his refusal to allow Obama to put Garland on the SCOTUS in 2016 was gold. The harm this maggot would have caused would have been immense.
16 candidates originally started out seeking the GOP nomination in 2016 and I believe DJT was ranked 16 out of 16. He up and wins not only the nomination but the Presidency as well.
It was a given Hillary would win in 2016, done deal right.
So Obama gets Garland in 2016 and the Left has
Sotomayor
Kagan
Garland
Breyer
and then Hillary gets 2 and really the odds were that the Left would have
Sotomayor
Kagan
Garland
Breyer
Clinton Leftist
Clinton Leftist
6 solid Leftists.
Biden gets Jackson who replaces Breyer who is to the Left of Breyer.
This is what the odds say should have happened, hands down.
Anyone here want to take a guess what our 2A rights would look like today had the above happened.
We would have no recourse, none.
Anyone here want to take a guess at how easily we can slip back to 2016.
This is why the Leftists are spitting and foaming at the mouth over Trump, their goals were right at their fingertips, right there.
That's a Mass thing, not a fed thing.If it comes down to you, need a storefront an actual gun store to become an FFL to sell a single gun. Then they’re going to deny your application regardless because of various reasons.
I'm not "supporting this shit", OTOH I won't go all chicken-little over a relatively minor "rulemaking" exercise.anybody supporting this shit has no clue how it really works
For sure but I am happy he kept Garland off the SCOTUS.The same Mitch who voted in favor of the Safer Communities Act that created this problem? f*** him. He’s an unforgivable piece of shit.
You are correct I guess I don’t know how it works. I’ve stuck in Massachusetts so long.That's a Mass thing, not a fed thing.
In the majority of the country, you need $200 and a clean background check and you can have your own "kitchen table" Type 01 FFL.
I'm not "supporting this shit", OTOH I won't go all chicken-little over a relatively minor "rulemaking" exercise.