The AG asserts in the filing that combat-style assault rifles and large-capacity magazines—the weapons and accessories of choice in America’s deadliest mass shootings—pose an inordinate risk to the safety of the public and law enforcement officers, with no meaningful utility for individual self-defense.
Huh. I'd challenge the AG to read the introductions to just about any police-run "patrol rifle" training classes, which espouse the benefits of a "patrol rifle" vs a shotgun or handgun, and then come back & explain why mere "citizens" should not have the same benefits.
Old West sheriffs and marshals often carried a Colt .45 called the Peacemaker. But that .45 had the limitations of all handguns, so savvy Western lawmen also kept a short-barreled repeating rifle like a Winchester in their saddle bags. They knew that in a real gunfight, a carbine is the real...
Huh. I'd challenge the AG to read the introductions to just about any police-run "patrol rifle" training classes, which espouse the benefits of a "patrol rifle" vs a shotgun or handgun, and then come back & explain why mere "citizens" should not have the same benefits.
On suppressors how does one make something that's already illegal in MA more illegal?
There are times where I have my doubts on the IQs of Govt officials.
What , the same guns that aren't safe for the public to have are fine for cops ?
Cops are fine with unsafe guns that blow up ?
Make that argument in front of a non moonbat judge. please.