DispositionMatrix
NES Member
HR8167:
Text - H.R.8167 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): RETURN our Constitutional Rights Act of 2022
The goal is to excise the 10% excise tax on handgun purchases and the 11% excise tax on long, ammo, and archery purchases that provide funding for the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669b(a)) from the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Some of the funds have been put to good use in conservation, and the bill has pitted conservationists against those who believe rights should not be taxed. My guess is, though, alleged misuse of existing revenue and Democratic braying about increasing the taxes and using them to fund firearm prohibition, sold as doing something about "gun violence," is what prompted this bill.
Here is a fun paper on how the revenue is used:
Violent Entanglements on JSTOR
Text - H.R.8167 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): RETURN our Constitutional Rights Act of 2022
The goal is to excise the 10% excise tax on handgun purchases and the 11% excise tax on long, ammo, and archery purchases that provide funding for the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 669b(a)) from the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Some of the funds have been put to good use in conservation, and the bill has pitted conservationists against those who believe rights should not be taxed. My guess is, though, alleged misuse of existing revenue and Democratic braying about increasing the taxes and using them to fund firearm prohibition, sold as doing something about "gun violence," is what prompted this bill.
Here is a fun paper on how the revenue is used:
Violent Entanglements on JSTOR