A Leo might. I suppose if you are in your car and someone tries to carjack you, though I would first try to drive over them if they are in front of me.Under what circumstances would you ever need to shoot through a windshield?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
A Leo might. I suppose if you are in your car and someone tries to carjack you, though I would first try to drive over them if they are in front of me.Under what circumstances would you ever need to shoot through a windshield?
You’ve obviously never tried to cross Chelmsford Street in Lowell at lunchtime..Under what circumstances would you ever need to shoot through a windshield?
Versus 9 MMetrosexual.
Do you mean like my glock 21. Its capacity is 13 + 1 in .45acp. My 1911's hold 10 + 1 using Chip McCormick magazines. Not much difference in round count really. Accuracy advantage goes to the 1911 however. I'll stack up my Colt, Springfield Armory and Kimber1911's against the Glock 21 any day. More modern designs are not always better. Only a fool thinks that way.I have 10+1 in my 45 AND 10-1 in my 9mm. Once free to use standard capacity, my 45 will be capable of 15+1 and my 9mm will be 17+1. Two extra rounds, big woop.
Point is, your guns are ancient! Get a modern gun.
I have a p365 with a wilson xl frame for summer carry with shorts, but again, it doesn't have the accuracy of the 1911. Sorry to hear that 10 round magazines are a pain for you.. Again modern design isn't always better.Glock 21 and 5” 1911s are nowhere near as concealable as a Glock 43x and P365xl.
I’ve still got several full sized 1911s. I never carried more than 8+1 in my 1911s. 10 round mags are a pain in the neck in 1911s. I do have a P14-45 and have flush fit 14 round mags for that gun, but carrying 14+1 45 in a 5” 1911/2011 is one heck of a lot of weight and size to carry. A Glock 21 is lighter but still a huge gun compared to a 43x.
Of course it is harder to shoot than a full-size 1911. It’s a smaller gun with a shorter sight radius and a worse trigger. But it is much easier to carry. A 4” gun with 6+1 on your belt beats a 44 oz 5” 1911 sitting in your safe because it was too much gun to be bothered with that day.I have a p365 with a wilson xl frame for summer carry with shorts, but again, it doesn't have the accuracy of the 1911. Sorry to hear that 10 round magazines are a pain for you.. Again modern design isn't always better.
You're making me want to break out my RO Elite Compact 4" 1911 this weekend!Of course it is harder to shoot than a full-size 1911. It’s a smaller gun with a shorter sight radius and a worse trigger. But it is much easier to carry. A 4” gun with 6+1 on your belt beats a 44 oz 5” 1911 sitting in your safe because it was too much gun to be bothered with that day.
Under what circumstances would you ever need to shoot through a windshield?
Won’t matter to me. I’m inpatient at MGH ICU. I’ve made a 50-yard hit on a bowling pin with my 4” Kimber Compact back when I could see iron sites (Jon Green at Goal can attest — we were seated in the back of a moving Goal minivan at the time, I was the shooter and he was my safety officer).You're making me want to break out my RO Elite Compact 4" 1911 this weekend!
Well sure if you leave your 1911 at home. In that situation I carry my Sig 938. It accommodates all of those situations.Of course it is harder to shoot than a full-size 1911. It’s a smaller gun with a shorter sight radius and a worse trigger. But it is much easier to carry. A 4” gun with 6+1 on your belt beats a 44 oz 5” 1911 sitting in your safe because it was too much gun to be bothered with that day.
Like debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.This has to be one of the stupidest threads ever. Not everyone will agree with what to carry.
Are they not all 100 year old cartridges in the end.Same idiots who think the 30-30 is obsolete for deer hunting (or inset any other 100-year-old cartridge here).
People in general are pretty retarded when it comes to hunting and calibers.Same idiots who think the 30-30 is obsolete for deer hunting (or inset any other 100-year-old cartridge here).
Traditional archery tackle can take anything in North America.People in general are pretty retarded when it comes to hunting and calibers.
A musket will take down anything.
Sure is hard though.Traditional archery tackle can take anything in North America.
I believe the word is "sporting."Sure is hard though.
Today people think .32-20 is obsolete, yet it was extremly popular for decades and was used as a deer rifle often, not with smokeless, but black powder.People in general are pretty retarded when it comes to hunting and calibers.
A musket will take down anything.
45 AARPThis has to be one of the stupidest threads ever. Not everyone will agree with what to carry.
Then Ill carry a 6 pack and split it with him obviouslyWhat if it’s Bigfoot riding the Loch Ness monster, but he’s not charging you he’s just kind of flipping you off like he doesn’t care anymore.
View attachment 735227
Finally! Correct caliber identification! Love it!45 AARP
9 MMetrosexual
Forty is ghey
380 is for women
22 is for kids