- Joined
- Nov 20, 2020
- Messages
- 171
- Likes
- 208
47 shot in Chicago this past weekend. Crickets…
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Can you show me where you get these numbers? Thanks!47 shot in Chicago this past weekend. Crickets…
Not sure where he gets his numbers, but I look at this oneCan you show me where you get these numbers? Thanks!
We weren't taking door stops with us during fire drills.Example related to me today by source in a MA high school.
- Physically doors can remain in a locked or unlocked state, but this can only be effected by a keyed cylinder on the hallway side of the door.
- Within this source's department doors are always in a locked state.
- However the doors are not closed they are held open by a wooden wedge under the door.
- This allows ingress/egress but in the case of an intruder the wood wedge can quickly be kicked out from the door and the closure mechanism will close the door and it will be locked to anyone without a key (egress is still possible).
- Unfortunately when there is a fire drill the teacher has to not only close the door but take the wooden wedge with them before evacuating with the students or the Fire Marshall will take the wedge; Marshall knows the doors are being propped but technically it is a code violation and his concern is fire not intruder deterrents. In the past I would say that a fire is more likely than an intruder but today who knows.
we also have a mega thread, so we can keep it out of hereCan you show me where you get these numbers? Thanks!
Thanks, but from what I see it's just other NES people posting. Where do they get the numbers - i.e. 43 dead this weekend, etc?we also have a mega thread, so we can keep it out of here
I’ll bet most deserved shooting…47 shot in Chicago this past weekend. Crickets…
In the line you quoted, I was referring to a "classroom lock" which is a type of lockset typically used in that setting. I thought it was obvious we were talking about the door to the classroomI think many comments here are riffing off of suppositions not known to be true.
For instance: which doors were locked which way, and which doors were police trying or not trying?
Please don't think I'm defending the f***wads of the Uvalde ISD PD or the Uvalde PD. They deserve whatever hate you care to send.
I just wonder if people are arguing about a situation that they don't even know existed.
For instance:
Are we talking about a classroom door? Or a building egress door with a crash bar? Or, a building exit door that is one-way without a key from the outside?
I certainly don't know, and I haven't seen any news reports that make it clear. Meanwhile, people are arguing as if it's known definitively.
A classroom function lockset is controlled by using a key in the outside cylinder. The inside lever always provides free egress. The outside lever can be locked or unlocked only by someone with the key. There is no pushbutton or thumbturn on the inside that could be used by a rowdy band of 7th grade seamstresses. This function is not just for classrooms…it can be used in any location where control over the locking/unlocking is more important than the convenience offered by a pushbutton or thumbturn (office function).
For that reason and another one: they didnt have a legal obligation to.Almost everything being talked about is a red herring. They didn’t do anything not because of a lock or any other asinine reason. They did nothing because they are cowards.
I believe that was a SCOTUS ruling, right?For that reason and another one: they didnt have a legal obligation to.
I believe that was a SCOTUS ruling, right?
Here are the two:
Castle Rock v. Gonzales
Particularly egregious. Woman has permanent restraining order against estranged husband. Husband kidnapped her three children. She calls police. They ignore her, tell her to call back later. She calls back later. They ignore it again. She goes to police station. They take a report but are otherwise busy, they need to go out to dinner. A couple hours later the guy murders the three kids and then goes to the PD himself and starts shooting.
CASTLE ROCK V. GONZALES
www.law.cornell.edu
DeShaney v. Winnebago
DSS knows father is abusive. They do nothing. Father beats children into a comma leaving him permanently brain damaged.
DeShaney v. Winnebago Cty. DSS, 489 U.S. 189 (1989)
DeShaney v. Winnebago Cty. DSS: The Fourteenth Amendment does not require the state to intervene in protecting residents from actions of private parties that may infringe on their life, liberty, and property.supreme.justia.com
Both cases the court ruled the state has no obligation to protect anyones life, liberty, or property, even if the citizen has a court order.
As someone pretty familiar with charges people watch way too many movies and have a distorted conception of reality.I've never seen a shaped charge, 21 years, 3 sectors, worked with more than a dozen local agencies including USMS. It was never even discussed. Imagine chunks of C4 and the ignition source going missing from stations or vehicles. To add upon apparently, the basic training goes out the window about 1/2 the time as it is. I don't know the answer if people aren't going to resort to training. Until the peopled trained up actually use that training, the rest is just pissing in the wind.
I wonder if the Castle Rock case will be brought into the Bruen case as if the state has no obligation to protect you then the state also has no right to refuse your ability to protect yourself, even with firearms.Here are the two:
Castle Rock v. Gonzales
Particularly egregious. Woman has permanent restraining order against estranged husband. Husband kidnapped her three children. She calls police. They ignore her, tell her to call back later. She calls back later. They ignore it again. She goes to police station. They take a report but are otherwise busy, they need to go out to dinner. A couple hours later the guy murders the three kids and then goes to the PD himself and starts shooting.
CASTLE ROCK V. GONZALES
www.law.cornell.edu
DeShaney v. Winnebago
DSS knows father is abusive. They do nothing. Father beats children into a comma leaving him permanently brain damaged.
DeShaney v. Winnebago Cty. DSS, 489 U.S. 189 (1989)
DeShaney v. Winnebago Cty. DSS: The Fourteenth Amendment does not require the state to intervene in protecting residents from actions of private parties that may infringe on their life, liberty, and property.supreme.justia.com
Both cases the court ruled the state has no obligation to protect anyones life, liberty, or property, even if the citizen has a court order.
I was going to say the same thing. Some people seem to be hung up on locks etc.Almost everything being talked about is a red herring. They didn’t do anything not because of a lock or any other asinine reason. They did nothing because they are cowards.
As someone pretty familiar with charges people watch way too many movies and have a distorted conception of reality.
No one is walking around with Semtex charges ready to be used. It’s a logistical nightmare with any type of explosive of any kind for anything,
There are plenty of more traditional ways to open those doors unless they are built like heavy vault door with more traditional ways of breaching that even a GED graduate cop can operate with a degree of success.
How can someone just stand there and watch someone die in a situation like this or Uvalde. Compare these cops to the 2 in California that got killed, they didn't hesitate to go into danger.This reminds me of an incident from probably 5 years ago. A Polish guy with some sort of mental crisis tries to drown himself at a public pool he’s working at. 6-8 cops arrive on scene and try and talk sense into him. He doesn’t listen and goes in and under water. Police refuse to help and order a lifeguard not to save him.
Fortunately the lifeguard disobeys them and goes in and saves the man. Only after he’s pulled the now unconscious man from the bottom to the surface and side of pool do some cops go in.
Later the police would claim they jumped in to save him themselves “within seconds”. Then a video comes out showing they stood around while he was under water for nearly three minutes.
Then they claim they let the lifeguard go in because he’s trained and they are not. It then is shown they ordered him not to.
Then they claimed they ordered him not to for his safety.
This is and has been the mentality of police for a long time.
Not everyone should be in those jobs. Problem is to many of the wrong people are there.How can someone just stand there and watch someone die in a situation like this or Uvalde. Compare these cops to the 2 in California that got killed, they didn't hesitate to go into danger.
"Orders, we were itching to go, we were begging the IC to give us the go signal!"I see a ballistic shield right there .
And you waiting for what you chickenshit MF'ers ?
I see a ballistic shield right there .
And you waiting for what you chickenshit MF'ers ?