So I know a lot of us M*******s have some preban mags for our Sigs, Glocks, AR's etc. Has anyone ever heard if someone being charged for having a post ban full cap mag. Just curious because I never have. How is it handled?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Sure, usually drug dealers or violent criminals.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news_op...tate_police_seize_high_capacity_gun_in_arrest
Use this search string in google to get many more instances:
large capacity feeding device site:bostonglobe.com
Yeah but I'm talking about the good guys. Like if you get pulled over and have to show your gun. Maybe they look at the mag and think it's illegal.
Sure, usually drug dealers or violent criminals.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news_op...tate_police_seize_high_capacity_gun_in_arrest
Use this search string in google to get many more instances:
large capacity feeding device site:bostonglobe.com
Google the poor bastards nameI'm not clear what they arrested him for in the first place. Enough burden of proof to get an arrest warrant? How does that turn up? Someone dropped dime, I guess. (trivia: Massachusetts was the last state to raise the price of a pay phone call from 10c to 25c.)
Google the poor bastards name
I'm not clear what they arrested him for in the first place. Enough burden of proof to get an arrest warrant? How does that turn up? Someone dropped dime, I guess. (trivia: Massachusetts was the last state to raise the price of a pay phone call from 10c to 25c.)
I don't believe anyone had been solo charged with High cap mags in mass. Usually they add th charge onto others like not have a ltc or similar.[/QUOTE
Agree. I've only seen that charge in conjunction with other changes. ''This below from WorcesterPD is typical.
"Mr. Valdez was charged with Possession of a High Capacity Firearm, 2 Counts of Possession of a High Capacity Magazine, Possession of Ammunition without an FID Card, Possession of a Firearm without a License, Possession of a Firearm while in the Commission of a Felony, Improper Storage of a Firearm, Trafficking in Heroin Between 28-99 Grams, and Possession of a Class B Substance."
Look at you being sneakySend all your pre-ban mags to me, I will sort them out, dispose of the ones you should not have, and send you back the ones that are ok.
I'm not clear what they arrested him for in the first place. Enough burden of proof to get an arrest warrant? How does that turn up? Someone dropped dime, I guess. (trivia: Massachusetts was the last state to raise the price of a pay phone call from 10c to 25c.)
I don't believe anyone had been solo charged with High cap mags in mass. Usually they add th charge onto others like not have a ltc or similar.[/QUOTE
Agree. I've only seen that charge in conjunction with other changes. ''This below from WorcesterPD is typical.
"Mr. Valdez was charged with Possession of a High Capacity Firearm, 2 Counts of Possession of a High Capacity Magazine, Possession of Ammunition without an FID Card, Possession of a Firearm without a License, Possession of a Firearm while in the Commission of a Felony, Improper Storage of a Firearm, Trafficking in Heroin Between 28-99 Grams, and Possession of a Class B Substance."
Again, likely NOT an AWB charge.
I know I keep harping on it this distinction is important, because having an LTC immunizes you from the charge that most of these unlicensed people are getting that you see in the news. LCAFD without a License and an AWB violation are two separate felonies under MGL. Theoretically they could probably charge a lot of these people with both but most of the time they don't even bother, because the standard of evidence is a lot easier for the first one.
-Mike
It's very interesting to me that no one has been charged for violating the AWB as a solo charge. We've had this law on the books for such a long time and it's only used as a tack on charge mostly.
One of the lawsuits that is pending against Gardner (IIRC) alleges (among other things) that the PD failed to return preban magazines that were seized when an individual's LTC expired as a result of the department's practices with respect to the renewal practice. There was also a poster on this board, recently, who claimed to have a friend in an unnamed town in a similar predicament (mag seized/ not returned) because the LEO was unsure of its status.If a LEO is looking at your gun to that degree you're probably going to jail for something else, frankly. I've never heard of this, not even when someone was disarmed by a true barney fife type for acting retarded and declaring when they got pulled over. [red]Obviously if your gun gets confiscated for something (say an SD incident, a 209A, etc) it might be subjected to a higher level of scrutiny if the LEO/investigator is a dick. [/red]It's worth noting that in most of these cases too these hits are likely to be "LCAFD without a license" charges (which is an easy-bag felony) and not that AWB felony charge which is much harder for them to prosecute. -Mike
It's very interesting to me that no one has been charged for violating the AWB as a solo charge. We've had this law on the books for such a long time and it's only used as a tack on charge mostly.
Yes they have been, firearms and magazines seized due to a 209a are all inspected.
Untrue.
Correct and I'm aware of one case where upon the 209A being vacated they checked guns and mags prior to returning them and then filed AWB and LCFD charges against the guy (no other legal issues involved). No idea how it all played out however.
Break out that single stack 1911, or glock 26, or snubbie and never worry about it then.
https://www.cheaperthandirt.com/pro...15-rounds-blued-finish-col-a5-708279006883.do
Single stack you say??????
But it's a ProMag. Half of them won't feed anyway, so you really only have 7 good rounds