Picked up this like new Glock 30 today from Zero Hour Arms. I was going to get a Sig P229 but that was before Fall River decided to give me an unrestricted license. My focus then shifted to something smaller which I could be able to CCW.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Picked up this like new Glock 30 today from Zero Hour Arms. I was going to get a Sig P229 but that was before Fall River decided to give me an unrestricted license. My focus then shifted to something smaller which I could be able to CCW.
Good use of depth-of-field ....
A Sig P239 would be smaller than the Sig P229.
I put 50 rounds of Wolf 230 grain FMJ, 50 rounds of Sellier and Bellot 230 grain FMJ and 10 rounds of Federal 230 grain Hydra-Shok JHP through it at the range today.
It ate it all with no problems whatsoever.
I couldn't disagree more. My Glock 26 is just as accurate as my Glock 19... or any of my full size pistols. And I shoot it just as easily.
I think it all depends on on the shooter. Some are fine with subcompacts... some may find it harder to get used to.
I've had a Glock 30 in the past and it was VERY accurate. Just as accurate as my full size pistols.
YMMV
You're 100% wrong. A full size gun is more accurate than a subcompact for many reasons. The longer barrel in the full size allows the bullet to stablize more than in a short barrel. Plus, the longer sight radius is easier for your eyes to pick up on. Plus, having the smaller light weight gun the gun won't absorb the recoil as much as a full size causing more issues to happen. Look at any research anywhere and you will find that you are wrong. If you're shooting better with the compact good for you but the gun isn't as easy to shoot as a full size. I carry subcompact guns myself but can shoot my full size guns MUCH better for the above stated reasons.