Federal (Lake City) XM-193 ammo

Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
2,573
Likes
294
Location
North of Boston, MA
Feedback: 45 / 0 / 0
I just read tht the Federal "Lake City" XM-193 .223 is NOT safe to use in sporter 223 rifles. Notes:

"While, .223 and 5.56 x 45 ammo are interchangeable, the 5.56 may be loaded at higher pressures than .223. SAAMI warns not to use 5.56 ammo in sporter 223 rifles. "

I just bought 10 boxes of the stuff. Should I get rid of it? Sell it on Gunbroker?

Thanks
 
IMO there is nothing wrong with XM-193 in a typical AR-15
rifle. Most of them will handle 556 NATO ammo just fine.

Edit: Some AR's may have an oddball .223 only chambering (doubtful)
and there might be some "hunting rifles" which won't deal with with it,
but I'd wager that's more of an exception rather than a rule. When in
doubt check with the manufacturer.

-Mike
 
Last edited:
I just read tht the Federal "Lake City" XM-193 .223 is NOT safe to use in sporter 223 rifles. Notes:

"While, .223 and 5.56 x 45 ammo are interchangeable, the 5.56 may be loaded at higher pressures than .223. SAAMI warns not to use 5.56 ammo in sporter 223 rifles. "

I just bought 10 boxes of the stuff. Should I get rid of it? Sell it on Gunbroker?

Thanks

Sell it now. Let me know how much you want as I am down to my last case.
 
IMO there is nothing wrong with XM-193 in a typical AR-15
rifle. Most of them will handle 556 NATO ammo just fine.

Edit: Some AR's may have an oddball .223 only chambering (doubtful)
and there might be some "hunting rifles" which won't deal with with it,
but I'd wager that's more of an exception rather than a rule. When in
doubt check with the manufacturer.

-Mike

I have a Bushmaster AR15, I'll have to give them a call.
 
If I remember correctly your Bushmaster should have a 5.56 Nato stamping on the barrel. Take a look.
 
Last edited:
5.56 OK in Bushy.

I can save you the phone call. Look at what is stamped on the side of the receiver. (I know MINE says cal .223/5.56 NATO)
 
Most if not all ARs are built to military specs.

That's not completely true, least not as stated. While 99.9% of
them might have a 5.56 NATO chambering, "military spec" is a lot
more than just the chambering. There are rifles on the market
that would not meet "military specs" as defined by the DOD, etc,
due to construction methods, etc. Note that "spec" doesn't
always have to do with "quality" but nitpicking by the DOD about
things like the height relationship of the FSB to the rear sight, and
a whole slew of other crap. There is some type of spec
document for companies building DOD contract guns, but I forget
what it is called offhand. Basically the deal is if uncle sam
wants, say bushmaster, to make a run of M4's for them, the
guns have to meet the spec in order to be accepted.

Edit: I will admit that some of this is apples to oranges, as FA/Semis
are two different ballgames, but the parts commonality is high.

-Mike
 
Back
Top Bottom