• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Colorado School Suspends 17-Year-Old After She Posted a Non-Threatening Gun Photo With Her Older Brother

KVX

Joined
Apr 10, 2019
Messages
716
Likes
1,350
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Colorado School Suspends 17-Year-Old After She Posted a Non-Threatening Gun Photo With Her Older Brother

She didn't break the law or threaten anybody, but her school still panicked.
Noah Shepardson | 10.24.2019 2:05 PM

Alexandria Keyes 2

(Courtesy of Kelley Moyer)

A tongue-in-cheek post from a Colorado teen about a trip to a shooting range got her suspended from high school.
On Oct. 11, Endeavor Academy, a public school in Centennial, Colo., suspended 17-year-old senior Alexandria Keyes for five days after she posted a picture of herself and her older brother on the social media app Snapchat. The two are shown holding guns and the photo is captioned, "Me and my legal guardian are going to the gun range to practice gun safety and responsible gun ownership while getting better so we can protect ourselves while also using the First Amendment to practice our Second Amendment."

The picture in question depicts Alexandria and her older brother, an Army veteran, wearing shemaghs (scarves popular in Middle Eastern cultures that are also used by some members of the military) posing in front of a Confederate flag and flipping off the camera while holding guns. In a statement to The Gun Writer, Kelley Moyer, Alexandria's mother, said that the shemagh her daughter wore was a gift from her brother.
Alexandria tells Reason that she never anticipated being suspended for taking the picture.
"Guns are huge in my family, they're normal to us," Alexandria said. It was a big surprise to her and her mother when police showed up at their house to investigate her as a potential threat.
Abbe Smith, Chief Communications Officer for Cherry Creek School District, told me that the decision to suspend Keyes "involved multiple social media posts that concerned the school community and resulted in multiple parents keeping their kids home from school out of concern for safety." Smith said that federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act protections prevent her from discussing the details of the case, including disclosing the other photos the district allegedly considered in Keyes' suspension.
Keyes and her mother believe the other posts the district references are a picture and video of Alexandria shooting at Centennial Gun Club that she had posted on Facebook and Snapchat about 8 months ago.


Alexandria-Keyes-3-225x300.jpg


Alexandria Keyes practicing her marksmanship at Centennial Gun Club in Centennial, Colorado.Courtesy of Kelley Moyer

Endeavor Academy's student handbook for the 2019-2020 school year gives the school broad discretionary power when choosing to suspend students for weapon-related instances. The handbook states that when a student's behavior involving a weapon off school property is thought to "[have] a reasonable connection to school or any district curricular or non-curricular event" and is "detrimental to the safety and welfare of the student, other students and school personnel," that the school may refer a student for "appropriate disciplinary proceedings."

The school's policy references Colorado law, which defines the grounds for suspension as "behavior on or off school property that is detrimental to the welfare or safety of other pupils or of school personnel, including behavior that creates a threat of physical harm to the child or to other children."
Why would a picture of a student legally visiting a gun range and practicing her marksmanship fall into this category? According to Cherry Creek School Board policy, the school district reserves the right to suspend students who "[repeatedly interfere] with a school's ability to provide educational opportunities to other students." Over the phone, Smith noted that since multiple parents kept their children home after becoming aware of the post, Keyes' photo could be viewed as an impediment to the school's ability to educate, even if the district didn't ultimately make its decision based on the chances that Keyes posed a physical threat. Does this mean parental fears can be a mechanism for the school district to veto a teen's extracurricular activities?
Keyes does not have a history of causing educational disruptions at the school, according to her family. Moyer told me that her daughter was disciplined for violating school policy only once before when she brought vape paraphernalia to school.
Moyer also says that Endeavor Academy's principal, Caroll Duran, explicitly told her that her daughter did not violate any policies but that "when [they] see pictures of a 17-year-old holding an assault rifle it sends panic through [their] building." In actuality, Alexandria was holding a pistol, not an "assault" rifle, in the photo of her and her brother (and was exercising excellent trigger discipline for that matter).


Moyer also contacted the Aurora and Arapahoe Police Departments about her daughter's suspension, and both agencies told her that Keyes did not violate any laws by posting the photo.
Keyes' experience reflects just one of many instances of schools overreacting to fears of gun violence even when there's no evidence of a threat. Reason's Robby Soave reported on the arrest of a 12-year-old in Kansas City after she pointed finger guns at other students just last week. That child now faces a felony charge of threatening to commit violence. Soave noted that school authority figures "clearly have the Parkland shootings in their minds as they overreact to mundane disciplinary issues involving students." Overland Police Chief Frank Donchez told The Kansas City Star that he'd "take the heat all day long for arresting a [12]-year-old" since he's "not willing to take the heat for not preventing a school tragedy."
For students caught up in administrators' hysteria, the impacts of poorly applied disciplinary policies have lasting impacts on a student's future. Keyes doesn't face any legal repercussions for her photo, but the suspension will go on her record and got her kicked off the school's volleyball team. She told Reason that "college is definitely on [her] mind" since "[she] want to go to med school" and that she's afraid that all the drama and rumors surrounding the event will reflect negatively on her in the admissions process.
Keyes can return to school tomorrow, but her mother says that her daughter is "terrified to go back because she is getting death threats, hate mail, and [negative] comments on her napchat."



Source:
 
Trolling on Snapchat, gotta expect things might go south.

This is what, the third student suspension over gun pics on Snapchat? New Jersey, then the earlier Colorado incident, now this one?
 
How is the school even seeing these posts? I have trouble imagining that the account urls are intentionally given to the schools by the kids or parents so they can watch. A Snapchat account can be rather anonymous. Facebook, not so much. It must be "friends" in the network turning them in?
 
How is the school even seeing these posts? I have trouble imagining that the account urls are intentionally given to the schools by the kids or parents so they can watch. A Snapchat account can be rather anonymous. Facebook, not so much. It must be "friends" in the network turning them in?
The article states other parents complained and were threatening to keep their kids home from school. A probable scenario is that other kids saw the photo on snap chat and showed the school administration.
 
If you are something, say something.... Comrade.
Not sure what you meant here. I'm not a "comrade". The post I was referencing questioned how schools had access to the snap chat account of the girl they suspended. I have a probable scenario as to how the school saw the photo....nothing more. Or am I misreading your comment?

The girl didn't do anything to deserve a suspension in my opinion and the family should lawyer up.
 
Should make a very good 1st Amendment case in USDC!
Len, as part of your classes, do you advise your students to tell their kids no gun pictures on social media and no talk about guns at school? My wife and I told both of our daughters that classmates and school staff are not to be trusted and no gun talk or pictures outside of our immediate family.
 
Personally I find the head wrap and middle finger more concerning than anything else. Talk about misdirected paranoia...
 
Pretty goddam stupid to post a picture like that.
She and her brother are just asking for trouble.
If my kids shot guns (which they don't) I would allow pictures from the range or a competition like the pictures you see on the GOAL website.
The best thing to do is stay the hell off social media. Once its out there you lose all control over it.
 
How is the school even seeing these posts? I have trouble imagining that the account urls are intentionally given to the schools by the kids or parents so they can watch. A Snapchat account can be rather anonymous. Facebook, not so much. It must be "friends" in the network turning them in?

"see something say something" retard mentality, some snowflake in her extended circle has a "GUH! BUH! WUH! " moment and gets "skeered" and then sends stuff to the Authoritas.

It is kind of peculiar though how barely/borderline shit like this gets jumped on immediately but if a white male incel does worse it goes ignored for awhile and then a bunch of people die. Of course there is the demographic thing- the incel kid probably has mostly "internet" friends and not real ones.

-Mike
 
Len, as part of your classes, do you advise your students to tell their kids no gun pictures on social media and no talk about guns at school? My wife and I told both of our daughters that classmates and school staff are not to be trusted and no gun talk or pictures outside of our immediate family.
Yes, and I tell adults that too (no pictures). It can cost you a potential job, cause grief like what we are discussing here, etc.
 
Pretty goddam stupid to post a picture like that.
She and her brother are just asking for trouble.

If my kids shot guns (which they don't) I would allow pictures from the range or a competition like the pictures you see on the GOAL website.
The best thing to do is stay the hell off social media. Once its out there you lose all control over it.

People have posted pictures you "approved" of , and still got suspended from schools, etc....

...so there's that.
 
I’m more concerned with the number of people here supporting the schools action while characterizing her actions as unacceptable, stupid, and problematic.

No, posting about guns shouldn’t ever lead to adverse action being taken against you by the state. Ever. It shouldn’t be “expected”. And suggesting she got what she wanted is moronic.
 
I’m more concerned with the number of people here supporting the schools action while characterizing her actions as unacceptable, stupid, and problematic.

No, posting about guns shouldn’t ever lead to adverse action being taken against you by the state. Ever. It shouldn’t be “expected”. And suggesting she got what she wanted is moronic.

I will say that, at least on a personal level, she probably could have used better judgement.... that aside, nobody DESERVES this kind of bullshit over meaningless crap.... long before social media, people were making mean faces with guns, yelling and threatening the targets at the range, etc. And somehow most people didn't get the cops sicced on them over it.

-Mike
 
Unfortunately the climate or better yet the Twilight Zone we are now living in has made what was normal and acceptable a criminal offense. Our rights and freedoms are being stripped away from us at break neck speed. It truly mirrors the rise of the third Reich for sure. Remember we can't think or express normal things without the government hauling us off to jail.
 
No question that was trolling. I'm also not buying her being "surprised" she got suspended over it. It's trolling. The flag was the big clue on that for me. (Ok, and her flipping the bird.)

Still, the suspension by a government school goes too far -- if you can't show yourself flipping someone off [at a range, masked, with your flag of choice behind you], then you can't show yourself flipping off the government [same list], to paraphrase Lenny Bruce.
 
I’m more concerned with the number of people here supporting the schools action while characterizing her actions as unacceptable, stupid, and problematic.

No, posting about guns shouldn’t ever lead to adverse action being taken against you by the state. Ever. It shouldn’t be “expected”. And suggesting she got what she wanted is moronic.
i guess if you want to pretend the cultural climate we live in doesn't exist.....but yeah she's f***ing dumb as a bag of day-old dog shit. Of course the school shouldn't suspend someone over that, but you'd have to be living under a rock to not know about kids getting in trouble for this crap, chewing a poptart into the shape of a gun etc.

If my kid got suspended for doing this same thing I'd be suing the school and smacking my kid upside the head for being a f***ing dope.
 
I’m more concerned with the number of people here supporting the schools action while characterizing her actions as unacceptable, stupid, and problematic.

No, posting about guns shouldn’t ever lead to adverse action being taken against you by the state. Ever. It shouldn’t be “expected”. And suggesting she got what she wanted is moronic.

No, only a moron in this day and age posts a photo rocking that attire , holding an AR and giving the middle finger. She wanted attention on social media and she got it. Take the same photo , faces not covered up, with her holding a target and I can almost guarantee the outcome would be different.
 
1 day for the finger, 1 day for the shemask , 1 day for the battle flag, 2 days for the gun.
Skeery things frighten teachers.
 
My kids are now adults but think of me as you will, I told them 6 years ago not to talk or post about guns. Of course they posted pictures of themselves with guns that we brought to the range as well as pics of me shooting. I even had Harvard Sportsman post a pic on their page. We got by, but the insanity level is not worth the BS of today. It's gone exponential retard. And wearing the head gear and flipping people off was not the best choice.
 
Great points. We should all DEFINITELY just give in and never do anything that may offend the sensibilities of SJW’s and the regressive left. How stupid of me.
That's what the left is pushing for. Just rollover on your rights. I don't understand how you can be arrested or suspended when you haven't broken any law except violating some PC crap. They just do whatever they want and you have zero recourse. You end up broke and your life is ruined.
 
I’m more concerned with the number of people here supporting the schools action while characterizing her actions as unacceptable, stupid, and problematic.

No, posting about guns shouldn’t ever lead to adverse action being taken against you by the state. Ever. It shouldn’t be “expected”. And suggesting she got what she wanted is moronic.
Exactly.



When the Nazis came for the communists,
I did not speak out;
As I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,
I did not speak out;
I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
As I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for the Jews,
I did not speak out;
As I was not a Jew.
When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out. I was alone.



One day gun-owners will learn..... but will that day be too late ?
 
No, only a moron in this day and age posts a photo rocking that attire , holding an AR and giving the middle finger. She wanted attention on social media and she got it. Take the same photo , faces not covered up, with her holding a target and I can almost guarantee the outcome would be different.
I don't, and neither does the ACLU-NJ. That case had snapchat, but no explicit trolling, and Corey was suspended anyway.
 
Back
Top Bottom