Anything about a S&W 629-1 I should know about?

[Rockrivr1]

I'm about to pull the trigger on a S&W 629-1 with the 8" bbl. Nice handgun in it's original configuration. Before I do is there anything about this model I should be aware of first? I heard that the original 629s with no dash had problems with heavy loads and the cylinder becoming unlocked. I believe that problem was resolved in the -1 model.

Figured I'd check before picking this up. Thanks!

 

[FLHTC]

I have 629 Classic 8-3/8, I love it. I had a trigger job, it made all the difference.

 

[Boghog1]

do the trigger job, I like my 629 but if I were to do it over again I think I should have kept the 686

 

[Pilgrim]

according to the SWSC, the 'endurance package' with hardened yoke and frame (called the transitional fix) didn't come out until sometime during the -2 series about 1989.

That said, the problem you are worried about never was a real problem unless you shot a steady diet of heavy loads. I had a -1 and never worried about it with regular loads and a few heavy loads once in a while.

Go for it.

 

[Kurtz]

Doesn't the 629-1 have the firing pin as part of the hammer? I have the Classic with the 8 3/8" barrel and I keep my handloads moderate, around 80% of max. The Corbon site used to mention their ammo was not suitable for S&W revolvers but that statement is no longer in their FAQ's. Same with Buffalo Bore ammo.

 

[richc]

do the trigger job, I like my 629 but if I were to do it over again I think I should have kept the 686

I have both in 8 3/8 barrels... they are terrific firearms.

 

[MDW Guns]

...l I should be aware of first? ...

Yes, the ammo cost will burn a hole in your wallet!!

 

[radioman]

How does one know the model they have?? -1 , -2 ???

 

[MDW Guns]

It's right under the serial number on the frame:

 

[yanici]

You know, it might be a good idea to put a rifle sling on it.

 

[Speedway]

I have one.

The only advice I will offer is buy two, because everytime I bring someone to the range with me, they want to shoot it.

Also, they can get expensive to feed unless you reload.

 

[Kurtz]

I buy .44 components in bulk, it's the only way to fly!

Just checked mine, it's the 629-6

 

[Rockrivr1]

Thanks for the information everyone. I appreciate it.

do the trigger job, I like my 629 but if I were to do it over again I think I should have kept the 686

Boghog1, why would you have kept the 686? Funny mentioning this as I'm doing a straight up trade with a 686 Plus for the 629. They both are at the same price point, and well I have two other S&W 357 mag revolvers. Figured it was a good trade.

according to the SWSC, the 'endurance package' with hardened yoke and frame (called the transitional fix) didn't come out until sometime during the -2 series about 1989.

That said, the problem you are worried about never was a real problem unless you shot a steady diet of heavy loads. I had a -1 and never worried about it with regular loads and a few heavy loads once in a while.

Go for it.

Thanks Pilgrim for the specifics on this. I'll have to bring this up with the owner of the 629!

Doesn't the 629-1 have the firing pin as part of the hammer?

It does. I like that about this handgun. My 686 Plus doesn't have that, plus it has the trigger lock. I'll definitely have to start reloading for this round.

 

[Kurtz]

Mine has the lock... My brother has a 629-1 without the lock, the re-sale value is higher I understand.

 

[Boghog1]

why the 686 and not the 629. I like the .357 as a fun and accurate gun to shoot. the .44 looses the fun after the first box of ammo (I guess I am a wimp) although it is fun I can shoot the .357 longer without bothering my hand. I was way quicker with follow up shots with it as well. from a hunting stand point I love the 629. I have been trying to buy back my 686 for near 20 years