World's most annoying SJW at immigration checkpoint

Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
1,466
Likes
537
Location
Cape Cod, DPRM
I didnt watch the whole video. Shes an annoying c*nt who i dont care to listen to, but the sentiment is sound.

BORDER CHECKPOINTS ARE FOR BORDERS! And I'm totally for border checkpoints, and border walls... With artillery and MG nests. But... 50 miles from the border is not the border. Fahk you!
 

Boston4567

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
676
Likes
919
Location
Merrimack Valley

Quoted from the ACLU link....."Even though you always have the right to remain silent, if you don’t answer questions to establish your citizenship, officials may detain you longer in order to verify your immigration status."

Seems pretty clear to me, but then I'm not a very learned man either.
Notice the lack of citations to actual court cases. I think they're just saying that from a practical standpoint, that might happen. But I have read through many primary sources (SCOTUS rulings), and I have yet to read a single one that says remaining silent at a checkpoint provides reasonable suspicion for detainment. Because there hasn't been such a ruling.

If anyone knows of one, post it and change my mind.
 

Dennis in MA

NES Member
Rating - 100%
25   0   0
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
21,121
Likes
12,335
Concur it's a whole lot of wrong. She's an annoying individual. I couldn't stomach 2 minutes of it, let alone 9 minutes. Checkpoints like that are a symptom of a bigger immigration problem that should be solved instead of violating the rights of citizens. Good border = no need for this at all, no need for a court case, no need for the USSC to ever rule on it.
 

Lank

NES Member
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
4,796
Likes
1,651
Location
Run to the hills
she voted for Hillary so eff her.
Correct. The left hates us and will joyfully watch us all simultaneously die if it furthers their agenda. And we keep ignoring this reality- and here we are because of it. We need to stop being principled conservatives all the time.
 

drgrant

Moderator
NES Member
Rating - 100%
61   0   0
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
72,225
Likes
35,634
Their ruling on internal border patrol checkpoints predates DUI checkpoints actually.

The Supreme Court has nearly always ruled in favor of violating the 4th Amendment instead of upholding it.
Yeah, not surprised, I just mentioned the DUI thing because they quite obviously had a chance to correct it.

With the CBP stuff the checkpoints should be illegal. It's one thing to do it at a border or a point of entry. I get that. (although as KD posted in the other thread, the shit that CBP is doing with the electronic devices of US CITIZENS is pretty heinous shit WRT illegal searches yet few are talking about it, probably because most droolcup voters dont ever leave the country and have their head in the sand.

-Mike
 

Dadstoys

NES Member
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
15,112
Likes
10,839
Location
North Shore
It's all theater anyway.
They like everyone else know where most of the illegals are.
Setting up a checkpoint out in east bumf*ck to maybe pick up a straggler here and there is a damn joke.
It they really wanted to bag a busload set up in downtown Lawrence and you'd run out of holding cells before lunch time.
 
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Joined
Jun 20, 2013
Messages
16,418
Likes
10,590
Location
Southern NH
It's all theater anyway.
They like everyone else know where most of the illegals are.
Setting up a checkpoint out in east bumf*ck to maybe pick up a straggler here and there is a damn joke.
It they really wanted to bag a busload set up in downtown Lawrence and you'd run out of holding cells before lunch time.
You are exactly right and that’s also precisely the problem. Violating thousands of people’s rights for show is reprehensible. But that’s what most of government is anyways.
 

The5thDentist

NES Life Member
NES Member
Rating - 100%
7   0   0
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
10,335
Likes
20,267
Location
The Karenwealth of Assachusetts
She's Libertarian Left. Motivated by a preference for small government and making sure feelings of non-whites aren't hurt. But she's 1000% correct on these stupid internal border checkpoints.

The correct answers are:
I have nothing to say.
Am I being detained?
Am I free to leave?
Shouldn't you be on the actual border stopping illegals from entering?

Nobody's going to respond well when you call them Nazis. And nobody likes being lectured to when you have a tinny voice.

But ultimately she's still correct.
 
Top Bottom