I brought up the Murdock vs Penn (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murdock_v._Pennsylvania) where the Supreme Court ruled . The privilege in question exists apart from state authority. It is guaranteed the people by the federal constitution. viz., The state cannot and does not have the power to license, nor tax, a Right guaranteed to the people.
That lead to the question of the other rights, in particular the 2nd.
Since the Heller decision, the Supreme Court has also ruled that it is an individual right and other cases have ruled that it extends beyond the home.
Am I making to much sense here an applying logic in determining that the state shouldn't be charging sales tax when you purchase a firearm, and that the state shouldn't be charging a fee for obtaining a LTC as that is what Murdock was doing, getting a license to exercise his right.
That lead to the question of the other rights, in particular the 2nd.
Since the Heller decision, the Supreme Court has also ruled that it is an individual right and other cases have ruled that it extends beyond the home.
Am I making to much sense here an applying logic in determining that the state shouldn't be charging sales tax when you purchase a firearm, and that the state shouldn't be charging a fee for obtaining a LTC as that is what Murdock was doing, getting a license to exercise his right.