AHM
NES Member
Works for me; not actually judging.Sorry I'm very immature and vulgar so when he said sausage I couldn't help myself.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Works for me; not actually judging.Sorry I'm very immature and vulgar so when he said sausage I couldn't help myself.
Are you delusional? This is home turf. They'd risk massive collateral damage to innocent civilians.That's exactly what they want. This isn't 1776 anymore. Drones and robots would take out all patriots in a month.
Yea, wow! Now that's a group that ranks high on the "government concerns" list!Are you delusional? This is home turf. They'd risk massive collateral damage to innocent civilians.
pack courts - defeat filibuster - all the rest follows. as i understand, that is the plan.I see no reason they won't go there. DC statehood, PR statehood, HR1 and path to citizenship for 11-30 million illegals. All are designed to establish a permanent, insurmountable Democrat majority. All that's needed to add a state is an accepted state constitution, simple majorities in congress and a compliant President's signature. That's a pretty low bar.
Think they won't do it? The only thing standing in their way is accepting the audacity of the plan and the filibuster. I see nothing that says they won't go there. If it starts to look like the house may flip in 2022 and it becomes a "now or never" situation, I'd say it's close to a lock.
There's even more to it than that. The actual quote that everyone loves incorrectly referencing refers to "falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic." If there's actually a fire, you can absolutely shout about it. Similarly, if nobody freaks out - no harm, no foul. And this decision is generally considered one of the worst in the history of 1A jurisprudence.And I hate the reference about not being able to yell fire in a crowded movie theater. You still bring your speech with you. You are just not allowed to use it in a certain way. That would be equal to saying that you can bring a gun to the movie theater but you can't fire off a round inside the crowded building. So that is a stupid analogy that hasn't;'t been dissected enough by the pro-2A group.
I see no reason they won't go there. DC statehood, PR statehood, HR1 and path to citizenship for 11-30 million illegals. All are designed to establish a permanent, insurmountable Democrat majority. All that's needed to add a state is an accepted state constitution, simple majorities in congress and a compliant President's signature. That's a pretty low bar.
Think they won't do it? The only thing standing in their way is accepting the audacity of the plan and the filibuster. I see nothing that says they won't go there. If it starts to look like the house may flip in 2022 and it becomes a "now or never" situation, I'd say it's close to a lock.
TX will be blue in 10 years, 15 tops.It's still straight up retarded.
Lol if you want something to ActuallyWorryAbout(TM) worry about Texas flipping blue. Which basically means, no more non-dem presidents, ever.
There is a exponentially greater chance of that happening in the next 20 years than DC ever becoming a state.
How ‘bout one that lost in a slide and cheated their way into the WH?How can any E O’s signed by a dementia patient be legal ?
TX will be blue in 10 years, 15 tops.
She had an intern die and the left is trying to bully her into voting for the commie bills "its what your dead staffer would have wanted". She's either genuinely mad about the left trying to bully her or play acting the moderate/swing vote well enough to tell them to f*** off.I figure I am at least as smart as your average bear, pic-a-nic basket wise and what have you, but I do not understand that exchange.
Perhaps it's just too subtle for us residents of Jellystone.