White House says Biden prepared to issue EO’s on guns

Is this the same interview from days ago? Looks like old news regurgitated and spun harder.

If I had to guess though, the pinnacle of these efforts will be classifying 80% recievers as guns. Of course it's something totally unrelated to the two shootings that necessitate haste in the name of safety, but that’s what the goons have been upto recently.

No I don't think he's got the means or balls to call a semi auto a full auto. It would definitely be a loss if so, suddenly all the pistols, even Fudd shotguns and DA revolvers, become NFA too - practically impacts all gun owners. Say whatever you want about SCOTUS but that ain't gonna fly and even Joe isn't that senile.
 
In the meantime, we become instant felons, subject to arrest and prosecution. Great. Go to prison. Lose job. Lose your home. Have spouse leave you and file for divorce. Declare bankruptcy. Then have verdict overturned by SCOTUS years later, after your life is completely ruined. What a victory!

I hope they do it by executive order and not legislation.
Executive orders can be overturned by the supreme court and the next president.
 
Once the filibuster is gone they will be able to pass HR1 through the Senate, elections will be a sham just like in communists and Third World countrys, then they will be able to add two more senators from DC, packing the court wiil be an easy task, anything no mater how nutty can get passed through the house and Senate securing the democrats control for ever or untill they eat each other. Just remember what the president said in his press conference he is not shure there will be a Republican party. This is a power grab the democrats feel they can get away with or they would not even try.
 
then they will be able to add two more senators from DC

...how?

Your first clause, the one about the filibuster, is a concern. But even if it goes, it's not a done deal that HR1 passes. And the rest of your post is just spiraling into areas so hypothetical that I stopped reading.

Let's not get crazy. Even if the filibuster goes, remember what they did that other time: they didn't nuke it completely. They just nullified it for legislative appointments. Expect the RINOs to carve out an exception for gun laws, and the Dems to go along with it because they're not stupid (unfortunately). They can't count on their purple-staters on guns, they know it, and they're not going to want to put themselves in a position where they look divided.
 
Why do you think HR1 won't pass?

It very well might.

But it might not. Because parts of it probably wouldn't stand.

And even if it does, it treads well-trodden SCOTUS territory. The courts have already ruled on gerrymandering, Citizens United, the VRA... all these things are affected by HR1, as is the constitutional provision that places the states in charge of their own elections, which in turn is supported by the state constitutions...

It's a massive can of worms, in other words, with multiple unpredictable court jurisdictions and an uncertain outcome. The Senate's pachyderms don't like uncertainty. Pelosi and Schumer are very different people when it comes to how willing they are to stick their necks out.
 
obama really took it to a never before seen level with his DACA. He literally created new laws, it was far beyond what is legal but roberts allowed him to get away with it

And then I think he was in on the ruling that said Trump couldn’t undo it.


All of this has happened before - voting (taxation without representation); courts (unfair/baised decisions); Redcoats coming to seize shot & powder.

The Founders didn’t know the outcome - but knew they weren’t going to accept any more mistreatment.
 
Even Pelose and Schumer are pushing for HR1 calling it a race issue. They have already stuck there necks out.
 
In the meantime, we become instant felons, subject to arrest and prosecution. Great. Go to prison. Lose job. Lose your home. Have spouse leave you and file for divorce. Declare bankruptcy. Then have verdict overturned by SCOTUS years later, after your life is completely ruined. What a victory!

Or just put your arms to good use and resist tyranny. You can only arrest the willing.
 
Yes, they want a civil war, cuz they''ll win, given the present parameters.
If even 20% of the country stops paying taxes and instead becomes hostile to the current gov't, that's 60m people. You can't subjugate 60m people with a force of 1 or 2 million over some of the most rural parts of the nation. Look at how Washington and the Continentals/militias beat the Brits: they didn't win every battle, they just won the most important ones and didn't admit defeat. Eventually, the Brits would reach a point where the fight was no longer worth fighting.

The Swamp would never admit defeat, but the conflict would reach such a point that it would make the entire nation ungovernable and with the supply disruptions to the cities, those people would be eating each other and there goes the Swamp's base.
 
In the meantime, we become instant felons, subject to arrest and prosecution. Great. Go to prison. Lose job. Lose your home. Have spouse leave you and file for divorce. Declare bankruptcy. Then have verdict overturned by SCOTUS years later, after your life is completely ruined. What a victory!
and if you don't resist, you allow laws to be created by one man and not just any laws, but ones that take away your very rights. Either way you end up a slave subjected to the whims of people who are supposed to represent you and defend your rights.

Be a man for God sakes.
 
and if you don't resist, you allow laws to be created by one man and not just any laws, but ones that take away your very rights. Either way you end up a slave subjected to the whims of people who are supposed to represent you and defend your rights.

Be a man for God sakes.
LE agencies may adopt a wait-and-see attitude WRT enforcement until SCOTUS hands down a final decision as to whether such an EO is constitutional. DEA has, so far, refrained from raiding and shutting down the many companies that are legally, under Nevada law only, selling recreational marijuana in the Las Vegas area. Such sales, possession and use are a violation of federal drug laws. Whether ATF would have the same attitude towards our newly-banned guns is questionable.
 
...how?

Your first clause, the one about the filibuster, is a concern. But even if it goes, it's not a done deal that HR1 passes. And the rest of your post is just spiraling into areas so hypothetical that I stopped reading.

Let's not get crazy. Even if the filibuster goes, remember what they did that other time: they didn't nuke it completely. They just nullified it for legislative appointments. Expect the RINOs to carve out an exception for gun laws, and the Dems to go along with it because they're not stupid (unfortunately). They can't count on their purple-staters on guns, they know it, and they're not going to want to put themselves in a position where they look divided.
We get closer and closer every day to adding 2 senators in DC and possibly Peurto Rico. It’s not a matter of if, it’s a matter of when. Did any of us think that thier would be more troops in DC than in Afghanistan at the same time? Very scary times ahead, even after the sniffer is gone.👍🏻
 
...how?

Your first clause, the one about the filibuster, is a concern. But even if it goes, it's not a done deal that HR1 passes. And the rest of your post is just spiraling into areas so hypothetical that I stopped reading.

Let's not get crazy. Even if the filibuster goes, remember what they did that other time: they didn't nuke it completely. They just nullified it for legislative appointments. Expect the RINOs to carve out an exception for gun laws, and the Dems to go along with it because they're not stupid (unfortunately). They can't count on their purple-staters on guns, they know it, and they're not going to want to put themselves in a position where they look divided.
True. they'll just do it for race related issues......................What the hell isn't race related to them.
 
This will pass and no one will do shit.
There will be no need for gun confiscation.
People will be encouraged to report any tips to a hotline.
They will pick off gun owners one at time while not reporting on it.
Get to know your neighbors and devise a plan should that come to pass.
 
They have as much power as the afflicted (affected?) give them. I wonder what would have happened if tens of thousands of pipeline workers would have responded "No" and just kept on working.
Too bad they didn't do just that.

The executive branch can declare Executive Orders, which are like proclamations that carry the force of law, but the judicial branch [rofl]can declare those acts unconstitutional.
 
Not sure why some have yet to understand that the Constitution ain't worth the paper it's written on. We don't need to see any more examples of Judges who make law and not rule on it. Whoever controls the courts will control the narrative, period.

The Demorats know full well they need to add judges to the SCOTUS and they will turn their attention to that in due time. The elimination of the filibuster is intended for the SCOTUS fight as well as HR-1.
 
And then I think he was in on the ruling that said Trump couldn’t undo it.


All of this has happened before - voting (taxation without representation); courts (unfair/baised decisions); Redcoats coming to seize shot & powder.

The Founders didn’t know the outcome - but knew they weren’t going to accept any more mistreatment.

robets opinion was trump didn’t use the right regulatory process to undo DACA. That’s not even a factor to me nor should it have been for the court. Obama illegally created laws through DACA so it was unconstitutional from day one. What trump did, the process etc is moot because the action from Obama was not legal.
 
Your not attacking someone thousands of miles away if it came to that .
Your attacking your neighbors .
You know , the people that know where you live too.

View attachment 466160
If it comes to that the troops in your neighborhood won't be from, or have any ties to, MA. Remember that the NG weeded out anyone who was considered politically unreliable for DC duty.
 
Back
Top Bottom