• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Which pisses liberals more

Yes, this just goes to show what big hypocrites they are when they rail against the 1% and yet they have some of the biggest 1% pulling their strings.
JayMcB said:
guns. their gods like Soros and Zuckerberg have shit tons of money
Click to expand...
 
banditone said:
Having lots of guns or having lots of money?
Click to expand...

People who don't subscribe to the notion that the government's purpose is to solve everyone's problems. That's was pisses them off.

Also, they hate people who disagree that a government solution is ALWAYS the best solution because otherwise someone might get left out and damn the consequences of a rushed "universal" fix.
 
Guns . . . . They know deep, deep, down that even little old ladies who own firearms have more "balls" than they ever will, and it will always eat at their inflated ego.
 
Guns. Libs like to relieve others of their money via taxes, welfare, grants, wealth re-distribution and wealth gives them the battle-cry of "it's for the poor" (even if it is not) and the opportunity to demonize "The Rich" to further their socialist agenda.

Guns = the END to their controlling ways. [thumbsup]
 
Being happy trumps having guns and money.

Be white. Be happy. Have many kids with white woman. Teach them all to shoot. Enjoy liberal meltdowns.
 
Can I write in "facts" as a dark horse candidate in this discussion?

I have learned that liberals really despise facts, they do so much damage to their emotional arguments.
 
boiler_eng said:
People who don't subscribe to the notion that the government's purpose is to solve everyone's problems. That's was pisses them off.

Also, they hate people who disagree that a government solution is ALWAYS the best solution because otherwise someone might get left out and damn the consequences of a rushed "universal" fix.
Click to expand...

I was talking to a good friend of mine a while ago, maybe a couple years, and asked her what she thought the purpose of having government in any form was. She said that "it's to take care of people". I laughed out loud and told her John Locke would disagree.

May he forever protect and watch over my personal property. RIP JL.
 
5811 said:
Can I write in "facts" as a dark horse candidate in this discussion?

I have learned that liberals really despise facts, they do so much damage to their emotional arguments.
Click to expand...

This. You want to shut a liberal down...real life facts. Sends them into a tailspin and they will immediately change the subject or go away...which is generally what I want them to do in the first place.
 
Just say TRUMP and they will explode into a incoherent rage. President Trump is the gift that keeps on giving and he makes repressives lose their minds.
 
Al-Jim19 said:
I was talking to a good friend of mine a while ago, maybe a couple years, and asked her what she thought the purpose of having government in any form was. She said that "it's to take care of people". I laughed out loud and told her John Locke would disagree.

May he forever protect and watch over my personal property. RIP JL.
Click to expand...

Yeah I have had that conversation with a friend a number of times. It goes hand in hand with "Just because something is worth doing doesn't mean its something the government should be doing".

It cuts to the core of the portrayal that someone who isn't for huge gov is heartless. Especially when you pit their inference that all liberals are caring giving people with the fact that they are inferring that noone will care for the community if the gov is pressing them into it against their will.
 
eboos said:
They hate cops too. Remember, "a hair dresser has more training."
Click to expand...
Cops are racist....but only cops should have guns!!!

A lot of those arguments come up often, x requires more training than y! Usually my counterpoint is that y shouldn't require mandates training either...
 
I severely pissed off a libtard neighbor by merely walking my dog wearing an NRA tee. He was saying "I can't believe you are wearing that in public....in your house is fine, if that's what you think. Are you looking to get attacked?" This was in a quiet lil neighborhood in Southborough. JFC!
 
Sauer Grapes said:
I severely pissed off a libtard neighbor by merely walking my dog wearing an NRA tee. He was saying "I can't believe you are wearing that in public....in your house is fine, if that's what you think. Are you looking to get attacked?" This was in a quiet lil neighborhood in Southborough. JFC!
Click to expand...

Attacking someone wearing an NRA shirt, a new kind of stupid.
 
Sauer Grapes said:
I severely pissed off a libtard neighbor by merely walking my dog wearing an NRA tee. He was saying "I can't believe you are wearing that in public....in your house is fine, if that's what you think. Are you looking to get attacked?" This was in a quiet lil neighborhood in Southborough. JFC!
Click to expand...

"Attacked by who?!"
 

Similar threads

Buying more than one firearm
2
Replies
41
Views
1K
Twigg
Twigg
Admit it, which one of you is this?
Replies
4
Views
315
Drix
Drix
Washington Transfers Seized Firearms to Ukraine as House GOP Continues Opposition to More Funding
Replies
7
Views
128
Animal357
A
Which one of you old bastards is this???
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
tinhorn
tinhorn
Thousands more gun dealers must run background checks on buyers as Biden administration moves to close 'doggone dangerous' loophole
Replies
4
Views
182
AJK129
AJK129
Back
Top Bottom