Acogs are big moneyI do not like it’s price, very much. All the rest is more than fine. But a $1k+ price is not ok.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Acogs are big moneyI do not like it’s price, very much. All the rest is more than fine. But a $1k+ price is not ok.
the problem, for the OP, is that red dots don't work for many folks with astigmatism. If you can use a red dot, this seems like a great option.I know this is not an answer to the question you’ve asked, but if it was me, I’d go with a Romeo 4t ($5-600) and a Juliet4 magnifier. You’d have choice of reticle with 100 000 hours battery life, and magnification on demand. Much more versatile than an ACOG.
The SIG Romeo 4t has reticle choice as a feature. The “circle+crosshair” or even the plain crosshairs doesn’t bloom nearly as much as a simple dot for people with astigmatism. And the 4t is approved by the FBI, SAS, and CAG Delta. That’s quite the endorsement right there. Either way, I find the fixed 4x of the ACOG quite limiting. LPVOs have made a huge leap in technology over the last 5 years or so. I think a 1-6 or 1-8 is where it’s at for a GP rifle, but again, it has nothing to do with the OP’s question. Sorry for getting the thread off the rail.the problem, for the OP, is that red dots don't work for many folks with astigmatism. If you can use a red dot, this seems like a great option.
That's super useful info. Thanks! (Having similar issues to OP I have a couple dots that are of little use to me. Probably going to go with a LPVO for exactly the reasons you point out)The SIG Romeo 4t has reticle choice as a feature. The “circle+crosshair” or even the plain crosshairs doesn’t bloom nearly as much as a simple dot for people with astigmatism. And the 4t is approved by the FBI, SAS, and CAG Delta. That’s quite the endorsement right there. Either way, I find the fixed 4x of the ACOG quite limiting. LPVOs have made a huge leap in technology over the last 5 years or so. I think a 1-6 or 1-8 is where it’s at for a GP rifle, but again, it has nothing to do with the OP’s question. Sorry for getting the thread off the rail.
I am still lost on what OP wants. for a tactical weapon with a task to hit human size targets any 3x or 4x prism based optic is best - an ACOG, or vortex, or primary arms, or AT3 - all got OK prisms to choose from with BDC reticles.the problem, for the OP, is that red dots don't work for many folks with astigmatism. If you can use a red dot, this seems like a great option.
I agree that a better definition of need would likely help more. What is the use case is probably the most important question, how good are his eyes (besides the obvious) is another. For example, hunting bear or deer in the woods if the northeast can probably still use a LPVO, especially with young eyes, while varminting is probably a different story.I am still lost on what OP wants. for a tactical weapon with a task to hit human size targets any 3x or 4x prism based optic is best - an ACOG, or vortex, or primary arms, or AT3 - all got OK prisms to choose from with BDC reticles.
to hunt - there are plenty of lightweight 3-15 or 4-16 scopes.
for a competition or 3 gun there are other scopes, with 1- on the wide end - was discussed here in plenty of details. my interests are precision shooting and hunting only, so, i typically ignore red dots or prisms on rifles (but got one on the tavor now), so - i guess it is really up to OP to decide what interests him the best, and drive a decision from that angle.
Was looking at some other things (future space fuel) and discovered something pertinent for tritium decay for the hardest of hard nerds.Every time I decide I want an ACOG, I can never figure out which one I want. They come "close" to what I want, but never hit the mark. Then, I start thinking about the cost, and the "advantage" of no batteries. After further consideration, I consider the no batteries feature to be the primary reason I don't get one. The tritium has a half-life of 10 years, then it starts to fade. The reality for me is that whatever I would mount the ACOG to will get taken to the range less than 10 times in the next 10 years, and will sit in the safe until one of my kids gets it. By then, the tritium will be faded and at or close to the end of it's life. I know the military likes them because they don't have to worry about that stuff.
Personally, I'd much rather have a low power variable that I can just replace the battery or remove it altogether if I want to preserve the electronics. If you don't need the 6x, 8x, 10x, etc. then just leave it at the lowest setting and don't worry about it.
If you decide to consider the LPVO instead of an ACOG, there are a large amount of options to look at and decide from.
I am still lost on what OP wants. for a tactical weapon with a task to hit human size targets any 3x or 4x prism based optic is best - an ACOG, or vortex, or primary arms, or AT3 - all got OK prisms to choose from with BDC reticles.
to hunt - there are plenty of lightweight 3-15 or 4-16 scopes.
for a competition or 3 gun there are other scopes, with 1- on the wide end - was discussed here in plenty of details. my interests are precision shooting and hunting only, so, i typically ignore red dots or prisms on rifles (but got one on the tavor now), so - i guess it is really up to OP to decide what interests him the best, and drive a decision from that angle.
Can’t disagree more. The tritium isn’t really needed. In fact, I’ve never seen tritium illumination in any ACOG I’ve used and I still think they’re great. Tritium is not what is useful. It’s the fiber optic that’s most useful.If you get an acog, just get a battery powered model acog. You don’t have to worry about tritium dying out.
Can’t disagree more. The tritium isn’t really needed. In fact, I’ve never seen tritium illumination in any ACOG I’ve used and I still think they’re great. Tritium is not what is useful. It’s the fiber optic that’s most useful.
At night if you’re using white light, the target will be illuminated and the reticle will be easily visible, if you’re using IR, you’ll either have a laser or be using a mini red dot for passive aiming. If you’re in a dark area and aiming out into an illuminated area, again the black reticle will stand out. And at dusk/dawn, the fiber optic is actually really good at collecting enough light, I usually had my fiber optic mostly covered with tape and just pealed it back as needed given the circumstances.
If the battery powered one still had fiber optic, with battery illumination as a backup, that would be great. But sadly they didn’t do it.
Neat, I’ve actually dabbled with this concept for the ACOG, but didn’t get far because of the form factor and the time involved in 3D designing a housing.I wonder if one of you mechanically oriented fellows with a 3D printer could come up with something for the ACOG like what Chris Roenker makes for the Mepro M21. It's a really nice little attachment he calls the Reticule Enhancement Module 21 (REM 21). It’s a small LED light that fits right on the M 21 and solves the problem of not enough ambient light when you’re shooting from under cover. You can leave it off most of the time and only turn it on when your reticle washes out because of your target lighting being much brighter than what the sight is under. You can see it at his website M1BullPup | Peace Through Strength.
This is what it looks like on an M21:
View attachment 485158
The REM 21 is the little L-shaped thing with the battery cap attached to the side of the M21. When you turn it on it shines a LED light on part of the light gathering fiber optic that surrounds the front go the M21. Would be harder to do for an ACOG due to the way the light gathering fiber is oriented on the optic.
Can’t disagree more. The tritium isn’t really needed. In fact, I’ve never seen tritium illumination in any ACOG I’ve used and I still think they’re great. Tritium is not what is useful. It’s the fiber optic that’s most useful.
At night if you’re using white light, the target will be illuminated and the reticle will be easily visible, if you’re using IR, you’ll either have a laser or be using a mini red dot for passive aiming. If you’re in a dark area and aiming out into an illuminated area, again the black reticle will stand out. And at dusk/dawn, the fiber optic is actually really good at collecting enough light, I usually had my fiber optic mostly covered with tape and just pealed it back as needed given the circumstances.
If the battery powered one still had fiber optic, with battery illumination as a backup, that would be great. But sadly they didn’t do it.