Mark from MA
NES Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2008
- Messages
- 11,643
- Likes
- 11,861
This is a better solution.
I do agree.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
This is a better solution.
Nothing good comes from cameras.As far as the specific circumstance you mention, if the club has been closed and the members are still using the club then they deserve to be identified and spoken with. You don't have to do it publicly but it needs to be done. They are being douche bags. If they disagree with the decision then they should work the members, board and officers for a change or leave the club.
Actually, we do. The transformer for the auto-flusher plugs to an outlet in the basement just below the toilets.Wait. You have a plug-in toilet???
Totally depends on how they are used. If they are used to play a game of "gotcha" I agree. Cameras can tell the club leadership exactly when and how long a contractor is at the club - (for example a cleaning company) arrives to perform a service. They can be used to find out what happened to left behind equipment and re-unite it with the owner (BTDT).Nothing good comes from cameras.
Agreed, but the lack of cameras will not keep these people in check. Unlike range walk-arounds, the club leadership can control who gets camera access, and even differentiate those who get live access (to check for snowplowing, lawn mowing, etc.) and who can play recordings. Eternal vigilance is needed to guard against people like that, cameras or not. The only "I'm important and you had better think very carefully what the next words out of your mouth are" I ever saw at a club did not involve cameras.It causes little power tripping fxcks to overrreach.
Or push back and comply with the regulations as written.Clubs need to push back and not comply.
No one “deserves” to be identfied in this anti gun shithole. It causes little power tripping fxcks to overrreach.
For one minute forget about the circumstances of the club being closed. You have members who are knowingly or unknowingly using the club when it is closed potentially causing problems. So you believe they should not be identified and spoken with? I guess I would disagree with you and leave it at that.
Actually, we do. The transformer for the auto-flusher plugs to an outlet in the basement just below the toilets.
Totally depends on how they are used. If they are used to play a game of "gotcha" I agree. Cameras can tell the club leadership exactly when and how long a contractor is at the club - for example a cleaning company) arrives to perform a service. They can be used to find out what happened to left behind equipment and re-unite it with the owner (BTDT).
Do you think someone who accdentally damages club property and fails to report it should be identified and contacted or shielded under a cloak of anonymity? If a gun is stolen should the club use cameras to figure out who took it (happened at Mass Rifle, thief identified via recording).?
What do you think of an entry system that logs every user who opens a door or range road gate?
Agreed, but the lack of cameras will not keep these people in check. Unlike range walk-arounds, the club leadership can control who gets camera access, and even differentiate those who get live access (to check for snowplowing, lawn mowing, etc.) and who can play recordings. Eternal vigilance is needed to guard against people like that, cameras or not. The only "I'm important and you had better think very carefully what the next words out of your mouth are" I ever saw at a club did not involve cameras.
Or push back and comply with the regulations as written.
It's pretty simple Pistol calibers, pistol range. Rifle caliber, Rifle range. You can shoot .22's on either range and you can shoot pistols and shotguns on the rifle range.
Or push back and comply with the regulations as written.
Woah take it easy, some of us paper holders aren’t a**h***s. BSEEMassachusetts gun clubs have lots of anti gun people. They are usually the ones that don't shoot much and are more likely to be on a public payroll/pension, or highly educated.
You'd think it's pretty simple except for the Fudds @ Independent in Foxboro who won't let you shoot pistol caliber on the pistol range - from a PCC. It gives the "wrong idea" to shoot long guns on the pistol range except that you're allowed to shoot any .22 long gun AND black powder long guns of any caliber on the pistol range. But a PCC? nope.
Is a BS really "highly educated" though? (From a BSME)Woah take it easy, some of us paper holders aren’t a**h***s. BSEE
Every club in the state has had to deal with this issue and I say with confidence very few boards made a unanimous decision.
Massachusetts gun clubs have lots of anti gun people. They are usually the ones that don't shoot much and are more likely to be on a public payroll/pension, or highly educated.
My NH club has a similar rule for one of the ranges. It's pistol caliber only but during orientation we were told explicitly no 22lr ARs as other people "might see them and think they can shoot 5.56 on this range." Seems like posting some signs would do the trick, or better educating members...You'd think it's pretty simple except for the Fudds @ Independent in Foxboro who won't let you shoot pistol caliber on the pistol range - from a PCC. It gives the "wrong idea" to shoot long guns on the pistol range except that you're allowed to shoot any .22 long gun AND black powder long guns of any caliber on the pistol range. But a PCC? nope.
I don't know him, but as an outsider I would also say it's appalling to see someone who represents themselves as a 2A advocate threaten someone's 2A rights in this manner. I would be very ashamed if I were him right now. Club expulsion, sure, but when you dangle the carrot of ruining a guy's life, you've crossed a boundary that goes beyond a mere "overreaction." It is completely inappropriate.I know Dick Striano. Over the years he has trained thousands, yes thousands of people for ltc's , RSO, etc etc. He has worked tirelessly over the years to help our 2A struggle. He may have overreacted here, and I am sure his club will discuss it with him, but he is a good man that has sacrificed most of his free time (20 yrs + that I know of) for his club and the second amendment. I was appalled to see the name calling and even publishing his phone number.
Right now I am very ashamed of this forum.
Pelham !!My NH club has a similar rule for one of the ranges. It's pistol caliber only but during orientation we were told explicitly no 22lr ARs as other people "might see them and think they can shoot 5.56 on this range." Seems like posting some signs would do the trick, or better educating members...
Sadly, you don't even know what the problem is.Then you’re part of the problem.
I know Dick Striano too, and he is complete fudd. He cuts corners, his training is not within the curriculum, and he treats the club like its his personal range and everyone else is just his guest. I am ashamed that the club lets him do what he does, thats why I left. I wasn’t surprised when I learned Dicks fair haired boy was arrested for stealing guns from the club and selling them to felons to support a drug habit. That place is and will continue to be a joke as long as Dick is in any position of authority.I know Dick Striano. Over the years he has trained thousands, yes thousands of people for ltc's , RSO, etc etc. He has worked tirelessly over the years to help our 2A struggle. He may have overreacted here, and I am sure his club will discuss it with him, but he is a good man that has sacrificed most of his free time (20 yrs + that I know of) for his club and the second amendment. I was appalled to see the name calling and even publishing his phone number.
Right now I am very ashamed of this forum.
I miss the days when we had a shooting team in high school!I miss the days when the Army ranges at Ft. Devens were open to the public.
Clubs need to push back and not comply. Simple as fxcking that. If your local authorities dont have your back, well then.... Duly fxcking noted and there is no reason to help identify anyone.
All I can speak for is my experience with him, and he was always a good man doing good things.I know Dick Striano too, and he is complete fudd. He cuts corners, his training is not within the curriculum, and he treats the club like its his personal range and everyone else is just his guest. I am ashamed that the club lets him do what he does, thats why I left. I wasn’t surprised when I learned Dicks fair haired boy was arrested for stealing guns from the club and selling them to felons to support a drug habit. That place is and will continue to be a joke as long as Dick is in any position of authority.
Newton Man Charged with Illegally Possessing Firearms and Ammunition
BOSTON – A Newton man was indicted today by a federal grand jury in Boston with illegally possessing firearms and ammunition.www.justice.gov
"... may have overreacted here,". Ya think???I know Dick Striano. Over the years he has trained thousands, yes thousands of people for ltc's , RSO, etc etc. He has worked tirelessly over the years to help our 2A struggle. He may have overreacted here, and I am sure his club will discuss it with him, but he is a good man that has sacrificed most of his free time (20 yrs + that I know of) for his club and the second amendment. I was appalled to see the name calling and even publishing his phone number.
Right now I am very ashamed of this forum.
I know Dick Striano. Over the years he has trained thousands, yes thousands of people for ltc's , RSO, etc etc. He has worked tirelessly over the years to help our 2A struggle. He may have overreacted here, and I am sure his club will discuss it with him, but he is a good man that has sacrificed most of his free time (20 yrs + that I know of) for his club and the second amendment. I was appalled to see the name calling and even publishing his phone number.
Right now I am very ashamed of this forum.
I don't know the guy but I'm with daekken on this.I don't know him, but as an outsider I would also say it's appalling to see someone who represents themselves as a 2A advocate threaten someone's 2A rights in this manner. I would be very ashamed if I were him right now. Club expulsion, sure, but when you dangle the carrot of ruining a guy's life, you've crossed a boundary that goes beyond a mere "overreaction." It is completely inappropriate.
I know Dick Striano. Over the years he has trained thousands, yes thousands of people for ltc's , RSO, etc etc. He has worked tirelessly over the years to help our 2A struggle. He may have overreacted here, and I am sure his club will discuss it with him, but he is a good man that has sacrificed most of his free time (20 yrs + that I know of) for his club and the second amendment. I was appalled to see the name calling and even publishing his phone number.
Right now I am very ashamed of this forum.
Here's a related story of liability for someone doing what Stiano is threatening.
When I joined Ames, the president bragged to me that a member violated some rule and was thrown out of the club. The president told me that he notified the issuing chief and suggested that the person's LTC be pulled. Said chief did pull the guy's LTC. Said person then sued the club, the club president and the police chief . . . and won a large judgment from each. The club president told me that he paid out a 5-figure judgment to the guy. No idea what the club or town had to pay. [I also have no idea why the club president made a point to tell me that story . . . and I know nothing further about what happened or who it was.]
I know Dick Striano. Over the years he has trained thousands, yes thousands of people for ltc's , RSO, etc etc. He has worked tirelessly over the years to help our 2A struggle. He may have overreacted here, and I am sure his club will discuss it with him, but he is a good man that has sacrificed most of his free time (20 yrs + that I know of) for his club and the second amendment. I was appalled to see the name calling and even publishing his phone number.
Right now I am very ashamed of this forum.
This is exactly the problem from a club stewardship point of view, regardless of the morality of ratting out others. Making someone a de facto prohibited person in Mass is just asking for a whoop-ass of litigation. Now imagine that five figure judgment times sixteen. That would kill a rich club, never mind a small club as this one appears to be.
If the guy's son has issues with drugs and stealing guns to sell them to feed his addiction, there's no way this guy should be president of a gun club. Or even a member.