• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

We're paying for what !!! Yup global disarming !

If a pissant 19th century country like NK can ignore the UN, why can't we? The government can't enter into treaties that violate US laws or the Constitution. Ignore the UN.
 
UN charter:
Article 1
The Purposes of the United Nations are:
  1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;
  2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;
  3. To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and
  4. To be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.
So how does F'ing with the internal workings of a country fit into this?? It's not an international item, it's internal to a country. So the UN should GTFO of the internal workings of a country. Well, unless there's atrocities being committed (crimes against humanity level stuff). But don't go trying to limit MY rights/freedoms.

As with most things political, it's deviated quite a lot (IMO) from what it was originally setup to be. No real surprise there for many of us.
 
UN charter:
Article 1
The Purposes of the United Nations are:
  1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;
  2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;
  3. To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and
  4. To be a centre for harmonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends.
So how does F'ing with the internal workings of a country fit into this?? It's not an international item, it's internal to a country. So the UN should GTFO of the internal workings of a country. Well, unless there's atrocities being committed (crimes against humanity level stuff). But don't go trying to limit MY rights/freedoms.

As with most things political, it's deviated quite a lot (IMO) from what it was originally setup to be. No real surprise there for many of us.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they tried to deem “gun violence” in the US a “humanitarian crisis.”
 
Back
Top Bottom