• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Washington D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine is suing Polymer 80

Reptile

NES Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
28,001
Likes
20,273
Feedback: 123 / 0 / 0
Describing popular hobby gun kit provider Polymer80 as “selling untraceable firearms” to area residents, Washington D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine is suing the company.

Nevada-based Polymer80 is a household name in American gun culture due to the widespread use of their patented “80 percent” AR-15 and pistol frames. The company has long relied on their products as being is well within the ATF’s parameters of what is defined as a “receiver blank,” fundamentally just selling partially formed chunks of polymer that have not yet reached a stage of manufacture that meets the definition of “firearm frame” or “receiver” under the 1968 Gun Control Act.

Racine– an elected Democrat that has been in office in D.C. since 2015 and has been the subject of federal lawsuits from Second Amendment groups over the District’s harsh anti-gun laws— sees the matter of Polymer 80’s chucks of plastic and accompanying accessories much different.

“The Office of the Attorney General is seeking a court order to stop the company from selling ghost guns to D.C. consumers and to get these deadly weapons off our streets,” said Racine’s office in a statement.

The complaint against the company this week in a D.C. Superior Court, argues that Polymer80 is selling “firearms” that violate the District’s gun laws, has failed to “disclose it is not licensed to sell firearms in the District,” and is falsely claiming its products are legal in the District. The legal action is asking the court to block the company from selling “illegal ghost guns” as well as to apply civil penalties, monetary relief, and legal costs.

The action from D.C. is not the first time the company has been in the sights of anti-gun AGs. Last year, Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro issued a new interpretation of state law that expanded what constituted a “firearm” in the Commonwealth to include just about anything that could be developed into a gun, specifically “partially-manufactured frames and receivers” and “80 percent receivers.” Polymer80, as a plaintiff in a legal effort backed by the Firearms Policy Coalition, was able to win an injunction in court blocking enforcement of the new policy.

 
There really needs to be some personal liability for elected officials who abuse the public trust like this. That's the only way to stop this shit: make it hurt when they lose.
 
shit, dc is 60% government workers, politicians etc., 35% thug and 5% other. try being more aggressive towards the perpetrators. oh wait, we can't.....
 
This was an episode of Law & Order back in the day. Might have been 4th or 5th season. But it was turning semi's into full-auto guns. McCoy got his ass handed to him but was pissed. It was so overtly anti-gun as to be shocking to just about anyone but the true sheeple. (He sued the gun manf. for making a gun that was "too easy" to convert to full-auto. Not that they were making an unsafe gun or that they were making full auto - just that someone had figured out how to game the design.)
 
Exactly why they can be sued - gun manufacturers cannot be sued but they’re not guns.

Not technically correct. Gun manufacturers can be sued, and they get sued all the time. They cant be sued for the misuse of their product by others.

As not being a gun manufacturer, they're left open for lawsuits due to misuse of their product. I'm sure their legal team has had a strategy for this since day 1.
 
This is not an attempt to win the lawsuit, it’s an attempt to bankrupt a legit company in order to push a political agenda.

The same approach that Mora gets away with her BS. Gun shops are scared into compliance b/c simply fighting this crap will likely bankrupt them win or lose. Meanwhile the govt has endless taxpayer funds to push their tyranny
 
This is not an attempt to win the lawsuit, it’s an attempt to bankrupt a legit company in order to push a political agenda.

The same approach that Mora gets away with her BS. Gun shops are scared into compliance b/c simply fighting this crap will likely bankrupt them win or lose. Meanwhile the govt has endless taxpayer funds to push their tyranny
Its called lawfare, are there is a blog about it. And it needs to be destroyed
 
This is not an attempt to win the lawsuit, it’s an attempt to bankrupt a legit company in order to push a political agenda.

The same approach that Mora gets away with her BS. Gun shops are scared into compliance b/c simply fighting this crap will likely bankrupt them win or lose. Meanwhile the govt has endless taxpayer funds to push their tyranny

This is why AG's that push bullshit cases with no basis in law need to be personally liable and face prosecution for abusing their office by the DoJ.
 
This 80% banning shit is absurd. They fall CLEARLY within ATF guidelines. Even receivers on their own are not firearms, they're just serialized.
 
This 80% banning shit is absurd. They fall CLEARLY within ATF guidelines. Even receivers on their own are not firearms, they're just serialized.
They're serialized because federally they are firearms. MA has its own special interpretation where a firearm is defined by its ability to fire a shot.
 
Back
Top Bottom