If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
The objective here isn't to rack-up more wins than losses. The objective is to challenge the very validity f orestrictions themselves, i.e. the law. Again, most of our projects have that aim, we want to change the playing field for everyone.I'm very interested in this still, do you have any information on wins v. losses and negative fallout from local PD's if any?
The objective here isn't to rack-up more wins than losses. The objective is to challenge the very validity f orestrictions themselves, i.e. the law. Again, most of our projects have that aim, we want to change the playing field for everyone.
Most government officials subject to civil suits understand that they're being sued in their 'official capacity'. Sometimes it's for their policies, other times, like here, it's about the laws they represent and enforce. It's not personal. The police departments defendants in Fletcher were nothing but polite and courteous with our plaintiffs. The likelihood of getting your taillights smashed during a traffic stop after you sue your chief is extraordinarily remote. It would really be unprecedented for one of these people to open themselves up to a retaliation complaint from someone who filed a civil lawsuit against them.
And with most towns on the brink of financial ruins, I could see the majority of the small town COP being told to cave in by the Town Manger or Board of Selectmen and just issue "Restrictions: None." Lawsuit after lawsuit will cost a town a significant amount of money in legal fees that they just don't have to waste in the long run.
That doens't solve the problem. It only kicks the can down the road.
How so? I thought the problem was the restrictions, and removing them was the solution. This does that.
Because they can still issue them in the future. The end game is no restrictions ever...
Folks, if you have restrictions you want to remove we are happy to oblige the First Circuit and file a lawsuit in State court over restrictions because apparently the federal courts here are unable to litigate a federally protected right.
So, to be considered you have to be willing to sue your town police chief, we will provide the lawyer free of charge. Email [email protected] with the subject line "restrictions" and the following information in the body.
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Town licensed in:
LTC type:
Restrictions (exactly as written):
Confirm in the email that you can answer no on all questions 4-14 on the LTC application.
We will not be selecting everyone and will get back to folks within a week or so to let them know if they were selected.
And yes, I am serious about this. We will be suing the state over restrictions. Remember, you must be willing to sue your PD. We are not going to asking pretty please for your restrictions to be removed.
Just an update folks. We are still wading through all of the notes sent to us. I had hoped to have plaintiffs locked in by now but the storm and other things have slowed this up a bit. And keep them coming. If you are on the fence, send something in. You aren't bound by anything. The more people who toss their hat in the ring, the better our case will be.
Also, I want to stress, even if you are not personally selected, you will benefit and frankly we will be taking more cases in the future and so your chance at direct participation is not a one time deal. We will have future needs.
Comm2A, any updates on this action?
Also, I agree with the above from Coyote33 - I am at my club at least once a week and we have courses there. If there was a flyer that could be hung up there and handed out during the courses it would only help get more folks involved. Thanks Guys.
This is the single greatest thread ever. Thank you Comm2A and best of luck.
Comm2A, any updates on this action?
Also, I agree with the above from Coyote33 - I am at my club at least once a week and we have courses there. If there was a flyer that could be hung up there and handed out during the courses it would only help get more folks involved. Thanks Guys.
Comm2A, any updates on this action?
Also, I agree with the above from Coyote33 - I am at my club at least once a week and we have courses there. If there was a flyer that could be hung up there and handed out during the courses it would only help get more folks involved. Thanks Guys.
Is this a petition sort of case? or will you be hand picked to attend court to sue for your restriction?
im 22 years old, i have a clean record, no mental illness of any sort and have provided all of the paperwork and proof for a Class A in my town and am getting a Class A: Restricted simply because of my age. (they will not issue Restriction: None to anyone 21-25 in my town apparently)
id like to get some more info on this.
Stand by. Something is coming in the next week or so.
Stand by. Something is coming in the next week or so.
Stand by. Something is coming in the next week or so.
Red 5 standing by
Understand that this is a process that is playing out on many fronts. The 'restrictions' issue won't be fully resolved one way or the other until the US Supreme Court grants cert to a case that asks if the Second Amendment is relevant outside the home. Our job, which we share with many people around the country, is to create the best possible circumstances for that to happen. There are no fewer than ten cases of this type at various stages in the federal court system. For a quick recap of thse cases please refer to the Comm2A Leader Board.On a scale from 1 to 10, I am f@cking excited for this.
All the available evidence tells us that Worcester is issuing unrestricted licenses. It will probably take years for the NES zeitgeist to catchup however.