Walpole, MA: Bullets scare off intruder

Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
873
Likes
1
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
Link

Bullets scare off intruder

Police are looking for a man who broke into an Everett Street home Saturday and then fled when the homeowner’s son opened fire on him.

The gunfire broke out at 5 Everett St. at about 9:15 a.m. Saturday when the homeowner’s 30-year-old son came by to check on the house while his parents were away, Deputy Police Chief Scott Bushway said yesterday.

Police haven’t released the name of the homeowner or his son and no one answered the doorbell at the three-story Everett Street home yesterday afternoon.

But when the homeowner’s son walked into the house Saturday, he spotted an unidentified man inside, police said. When the intruder grabbed a knife out of the kitchen, the son pulled out his own firearm and shot at the burglar twice, said Bushway.

Instead of hitting the intruder, the bullets lodged in the wall and floor of the house. But the gunfire was enough to scare away the man, who ran out of the house, Bushway said.

Police are investigating the break-in and looking for the intruder, but Bushway would not release a description of the man yesterday.

No charges have been filed against the son of the Everett Street homeowner, who does have a permit to carry a firearm, Bushway said.

Massachusetts General Law 278, s.8A, also known as the Castle Doctrine, states that occupants of a dwelling are allowed to defend themselves, using "reasonable means" if the occupant has reason to believe that an unlawful intruder intends to harm him.
 
Boy am I glad that the paper didn't identify who lives at this unoccupied home and they only published the address! [rolleyes]

Dumber and dumber!
 
I'd say going for a knife is a pretty good indication that harm is imminent! [smile]

Glad this guy was armed. Man, that's scary stuff.
 
Maybe they need a "permit" system for reporting.
You know, it's fair enough for you poor bass turds to jump through a zillion hoops to be able to carry (MA residents), why shouldn't the reporters have to do the same thing?
If the house is burgled again, can they sue the press?? Or is that 1st amendment?? If you can't yell "fire" in a theatre, then how is it legal to publish a story about an unoccupied dwelling? Maybe the paper will pick up the tab for security until the family returns???? Only fair right?

I'm surprised they didn't lock up the shooter for creating a "public nuisance" with that gunfire noise.
I know Maine kind of sucks in a lot of ways but thank God we have some lax gun laws.
 
LenS said:
Boy am I glad that the paper didn't identify who lives at this unoccupied home and they only published the address! [rolleyes]

Dumber and dumber!

[rofl] [laugh2] [rofl]

Hey, why wouldn't they release a description of the perp?
 
Good thing this didn't happen in the People's Republic of Meninostan. Mumbles prefers innocent people get stabbed by knife-weilding lowlife tugs while checking in on their parents' houses.

Then again, Mumbles is a total moron.
 
Boy am I glad that the paper didn't identify who lives at this unoccupied home and they only published the address! [rolleyes]

Dumber and dumber!

Yeah if I was their son I would be pissed that now I have to stay there 24/7. Because now everyone on the internet knows no one is home too.
 
Back
Top Bottom