If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
It's always the same story." I raised them from pups", "They were gentle and used to play with the kids". And then the crowd that says " It is not the breed, it is the owner"
Well these dogs were obviously well cared for and loved. It could have been something as simple as they didn't like what she was wearing. My dogs will bark at me if I am wearing a suit.
I agree people should not be afraid of pits, but you should take extra precautions. That is why I like hollow point .45 acp. I love dogs, all dogs. But if an unleashed lab gets aggressive I am not afraid. If it is a pit, I will blow it's f***ing brains out and tell you how bad I feel as I offer a shovel to clean up what is left of it.
2016 U.S. Dog Bite Fatalities - DogsBite.org
“
- Together, pit bulls (22) and rottweilers (2), the second most lethal dog breed, accounted for 77% of the total recorded deaths in 2016. This same combination also accounted for 76% of all fatal attacks during the 12-year period of 2005 to 2016.
- The breakdown between these two breeds is substantial over this 12-year period. From 2005 to 2016, pit bulls killed 254 Americans, about one citizen every 17 days, versus rottweilers, which killed 43, a citizen every 102 days (Related graph).
WOW!
Can't argue facts...very telling.
Thx for the link.
Ya, fake news.
My pit mauled our 10 year old pleather couch....and may be pregnant, ohh the horror.
Just like my guns, my dogs never hurt anyone.They are also not unwanted and worth more than most Americans entire firearm collection.
View attachment 215586 View attachment 215587
2016 U.S. Dog Bite Fatalities - DogsBite.org
“
- Together, pit bulls (22) and rottweilers (2), the second most lethal dog breed, accounted for 77% of the total recorded deaths in 2016. This same combination also accounted for 76% of all fatal attacks during the 12-year period of 2005 to 2016.
- The breakdown between these two breeds is substantial over this 12-year period. From 2005 to 2016, pit bulls killed 254 Americans, about one citizen every 17 days, versus rottweilers, which killed 43, a citizen every 102 days (Related graph).
WOW!
Can't argue facts...very telling.
Thx for the link.
I'm calling BS. Or at least put me on the waiting list for pups.
She didnt really eat it, its a $250 pleather piece of crap within weeks it was just a pealing messmYour pooch is the spitting image of mine. (including eating the couch, the scamp)
View attachment 215634 Cant say what might have set them off, but when owning a breed thats well known to get overly aggressive, one or two of these could have saved numerous lives......
I got the impression that the reckless conduct charge was more about putting people in danger than anything else -- Melinda Birse (the person walking the Alaskan Malamute that was shot), was lying on top of the malamute to restrain him at the time Robert Vose fired the shots. Melinda stated “How could he do this? Who shoots a dog? He could have shot me. I was hugging the dog when he shot him.” and “I was on top of the dog. He could have shot me.” This was all apparently happening while the 100lb Alaskan Malamute was chowing down on Robert Vose's 5lb Pomeranian.A bit of a tangent, but you may have seen this Seacoast Online article about the man who shot a Malamute that was attacking his Pomeranian, in a leash-free trail system in Rye. The Union Leader article was no better; both made it sound like a trigger-happy nut was blasting away. And that's how the police treated it: they charged him with reckless conduct.
If you read the link a few posts up, an anti-gun eye witness strongly disputes that account. I have seen second hand how the media narrative in arrest cases can be miles from reality and conveniently matches the police account/charges. The police are often the main source for the story.I got the impression that the reckless conduct charge was more about putting people in danger than anything else -- Melinda Birse (the person walking the Alaskan Malamute that was shot), was lying on top of the malamute to restrain him at the time Robert Vose fired the shots. Melinda stated “How could he do this? Who shoots a dog? He could have shot me. I was hugging the dog when he shot him.” and “I was on top of the dog. He could have shot me.” This was all apparently happening while the 100lb Alaskan Malamute was chowing down on Robert Vose's 5lb Pomeranian.
Pits are bred for many reasons. Those bred to fight, are bred to fight other dogs only, and to have very low aggression against humans (pit fights had human handlers in the pit, after all).I think people who deny that pits are more dangerous than other breeds are just wrong. Dogs are breed for a purpose. greyhounds to run, cattledogs to herd, huskys to pull sleds, retrievers to bring shit back etc. etc.
Pits are bred to be fighters, plain and simple.
Please go read Kelly Halldorson's first-hand account that I cited. The woman who claimed she was lying on top of the Malamute was wandering around waving her hands and screaming yards away, and had no snow or debris on her clothing.Melinda Birse (the person walking the Alaskan Malamute that was shot), was lying on top of the malamute to restrain him at the time Robert Vose fired the shots.
I think people who deny that pits are more dangerous than other breeds are just wrong. Dogs are breed for a purpose. greyhounds to run, cattledogs to herd, huskys to pull sleds, retrievers to bring shit back etc. etc.
Pits are bred to be fighters, plain and simple. Now I don't doubt that many NESr's have pits that are awesome pets and great around people. But lets face it, most of the NES crowd is more responsible and maybe a bit smarter, than the average pit owner.
What can't be denied is that whether inclined to do so or not, pits are capable of causing massive damage, are tough as hell, and are more tenacious in their attack than most other breeds.
Previous posters are correct, all dogs can bite or attack. And some pits would never hurt a fly. But pit attacks just seem a whole lot more memorable
Pits are bred for many reasons. Those bred to fight, are bred to fight other dogs only, and to have very low aggression against humans (pit fights had human handlers in the pit, after all).
Pits were also bred for companionship, and to be nanny dogs for children.
If you read the link a few posts up, an anti-gun eye witness strongly disputes that account. I have seen second hand how the media narrative in arrest cases can be miles from reality and conveniently matches the police account/charges. The police are often the main source for the story.
so why don't they open the dogs up and prove that they were "eating her"...also do some dna tests on the bites and bite measurements...all i know is the dogs in those photos are not 100lbs and 120lbs...they look smaller than mine and mine are 80lbs and 60lbs
“What I observed personally, it was in the community’s best interest,” Sheriff Agnew said. “Once a dog tastes human flesh it is not safe to have that dog around humans.” ...this is moronic...how many times has a dog licked a humans wound and never eaten anyone...probably should take all the soldiers dogs and cops k9 dogs away cause they taste human flesh every time they bite a suspect/enemy...something is still fishy about this story