• If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership  The benefits pay for the membership many times over.

Vermont passes law to make paramilitary training camps illegal.

Uzi2

NES Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
14,082
Likes
38,290
Feedback: 9 / 0 / 0

From the article:
Vermont on Monday made it a crime to own or operate paramilitary training camps in the state after Republican Gov. Phil Scott signed legislation introduced in response to a firearms training facility built without permits that neighbors called a menace.

Violators face up to five years in prison or a fine up to $50,000 or both, according to the law. It prohibits a person from teaching, training, or demonstrating to anyone else the use, application, or making of a firearm, explosive, or incendiary device capable of causing injury or death that will be used in or in furtherance of a civil disorder. It also bans a person from assembling with others for such training, instruction or practice.

The gun violence prevention group led by former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, of Arizona, who was forced to give up her political career when she was disabled in a 2011 assassination attempt, praised Vermont's law.

Yes, THIS Gabrielle Giffords.......... 1683579135055.jpeg
 
Sounds like the state would need to prove intent to use in civil disorder. People will need to be careful how they advertise/discuss things.

This is a huge pile of 1A violation though. In addition to stomping on the 2A’s protection of well regulated (trained and supplied) militias.
 
How will this jive with my 11yo’s trip to a Boy Scout camp in VT this summer (I’d rather it be in state but VT has a smoking deal for the pack)…..BSA is modeled after (loosely) the military. They promote all sorts of different life skills training, including firearms safety and useage….as well as safe swimming and boating practices, first aid, hiking, making due with what you’ve got….
 
Last edited:
How will this jive with my 11yo’s tip to a Boy Scout camp in VT this summer (I’d rather it be in state but VT has a smoking deal for the pack)…..BSA is modeled after (loosely) the military. They promote all sorts of different life skills training, including firearms safety and useage….as well as safe swimming and boating practices, first aid, hiking, making due with what you’ve got….
BSA is not what it once was nor what you might think it to be.
 

Amdt1.8.1 Overview of Freedom of Association​



The First Amendment protects many activities, such as communication, assembly, and worship, that are not solely personal but may be based on communities and relationships of all kinds (that is, association). Even though the First Amendment’s text does not expressly identify a freedom of association,1 the Supreme Court has recognized this right as an indispensable means of preserving other First Amendment freedoms.2 Specifically, the Court has recognized a right to associate for the purpose of engaging in speech, assembly, petition for the redress of grievances, and the exercise of religion.3

This right of expressive association is the focus of this set of essays.4 The Court has also recognized a personal liberty interest in certain intimate human relationships, protected not only by the First Amendment, but also by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.5 This concept of intimate association is discussed at the end of this section and in the essays on substantive due process.6

The Supreme Court did not always recognize a constitutional right of association. In 1886, in a case involving the formation of state militias, the Court decreed that state governments have the power to regulate or prohibit associations and meetings of the people, except in the case of peaceable assemblies formed to petition the government.7 It would be fifty years before the Court came to see the right of assembly as a distinct avenue for other kinds of association.8 In 1937, the Court held that the right of peaceable assembly is a right cognate to those of free speech and free press and is equally fundamental.9 The Court applied this interpretation of the freedom of assembly in a 1945 case, holding that the right of union organizers to inform others about the advantages and disadvantages of joining a union is protected not only as part of free speech, but as part of free assembly.10

(continues at link above)
 
Last edited:
How will this jive with my 11yo’s tip to a Boy Scout camp in VT this summer (I’d rather it be in state but VT has a smoking deal for the pack)…..BSA is modeled after (loosely) the military. They promote all sorts of different life skills training, including firearms safety and useage….as well as safe swimming and boating practices, first aid, hiking, making due with what you’ve got….
And making it with dudes
 

Amdt1.8.1 Overview of Freedom of Association​



The First Amendment protects many activities, such as communication, assembly, and worship, that are not solely personal but may be based on communities and relationships of all kinds (that is, association). Even though the First Amendment’s text does not expressly identify a freedom of association,1 the Supreme Court has recognized this right as an indispensable means of preserving other First Amendment freedoms.2 Specifically, the Court has recognized a right to associate for the purpose of engaging in speech, assembly, petition for the redress of grievances, and the exercise of religion.3

This right of expressive association is the focus of this set of essays.4 The Court has also recognized a personal liberty interest in certain intimate human relationships, protected not only by the First Amendment, but also by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.5 This concept of intimate association is discussed at the end of this section and in the essays on substantive due process.6

The Supreme Court did not always recognize a constitutional right of association. In 1886, in a case involving the formation of state militias, the Court decreed that state governments have the power to regulate or prohibit associations and meetings of the people, except in the case of peaceable assemblies formed to petition the government.7 It would be fifty years before the Court came to see the right of assembly as a distinct avenue for other kinds of association.8 In 1937, the Court held that the right of peaceable assembly is a right cognate to those of free speech and free press and is equally fundamental.9 The Court applied this interpretation of the freedom of assembly in a 1945 case, holding that the right of union organizers to inform others about the advantages and disadvantages of joining a union is protected not only as part of free speech, but as part of free assembly.10

(continues at link above)
And, just as the right of association is protected, the right of disassociation is also protected.

From the same article:
"Although many of the leading Supreme Court decisions on the freedom of association concerned burdens on association, the Court has also held that compelled association can violate the First Amendment.25 For example, in some circumstances, laws requiring organizations to include persons with whom they disagree on political, religious, or ideological matters can violate members’ freedom of association, particularly if those laws interfere with an organization’s message.26"

Go try to join or "invade" some Muslim or all black group and see how fast the tables are turned against you as a white Christian.
 
Reminder that Vermont was a red state up until the late 80s.
Yes, until the NY and NJ libtard crowd, you know those who preached "SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT" invaded the state and started dozing large tracts of land to build their McMansions with a nice view, displacing all the local wildlife, ruining the local small town feel of the state and ultimately destroying the state government with their absurdly hypocritical WOKE agendas.

My family had camped in the Vermont state parks for decades....I was still in the womb and thirty years after being born. Long before it became a cesspool of NY and NJ leftists. It was a grand place way back then. No traffic, small, quaint, country general stores where you could buy anything and everything from candles to guns and ammo and eat a home cooked meal.

THEN, the fvcking bastard NY and NJ libtards started moving in, destroying everything that was desirable about small town Vermont.
 
Yes, until the NY and NJ libtard crowd, you know those who preached "SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT" invaded the state and started dozing large tracts of land to build their McMansions with a nice view, displacing all the local wildlife, ruining the local small town feel of the state and ultimately destroying the state government with their absurdly hypocritical WOKE agendas.

My family had camped in the Vermont state parks for decades....I was still in the womb and thirty years after being born. Long before it became a cesspool of NY and NJ leftists. It was a grand place way back then. No traffic, small, quaint, country general stores where you could buy anything and everything from candles to guns and ammo and eat a home cooked meal.

THEN, the fvcking bastard NY and NJ libtards started moving in, destroying everything that was desirable about small town Vermont.
It started with the anti-war hippies from NY in the 70’s, but yes. They are essentially locusts.
 
It started with the anti-war hippies from NY in the 70’s, but yes. They are essentially locusts.
No it really started in the mid 1960's when all the anti war draft dodgers were seeking a secluded place to be able to quickly jump over the border into Canada and drug/sex communes were all the rage.
 
Back
Top Bottom