US Supreme Court OT 2019

Rating - 100%
26   0   0
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
7,168
Likes
3,583
Location
My forest stronghold
I really like the wording that Comm2A used in the Amicus brief. It was definitely well thought out.
That was great read, good job Comm2A!
We (Comm2A) simply re-hashed what we did for this case years ago when it was in the state court system. We think we have a compelling perspective on this issue and we're trying to get it in front of the courts.
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jan 18, 2019
Messages
41
Likes
17
Location
The 413
Just read the Amicus Brief—nice job Comm 2A! Interesting twist that Atty. Healey based the 2016 “enforcement notice” on copyright and patent-infringement law, i.e making it as intentionally vague and pliable as possible!
 
Rating - 100%
26   0   0
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
7,168
Likes
3,583
Location
My forest stronghold
Cert denied in Guedes. Dissent by Gorsuch. Read it here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030220zor_l5gm.pdf (Page 10)

Chevron’s application in this case may be doubtful for other reasons too. The agency used to tell everyone that bump stocks don’t qualify as “machineguns.” Now it saysthe opposite. The law hasn’t changed, only an agency’s interpretation of it. And these days it sometimes seems agen-cies change their statutory interpretations almost as oftenas elections change administrations.
 

Boston4567

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
559
Likes
486
Location
Merrimack Valley

Goliathan

NES Member
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
2,277
Likes
854
Location
Metro West
Is this good or bad?
They didn't cram it down the lowers courts' throats, so it's not great. Hopefully they're just waiting for another, stronger, case to come up. Hopefully.

The agency used to tell everyone that bump stocks don’t qualify as “machine guns.” Now it says the opposite. The law hasn’t changed, only an agency’s interpretation of it. And these days it sometimes seems agencies change their statutory interpretations almost as often as elections change administrations. How, in all this, can ordinary citizens be expected to keep up—required not only to conform their conduct to the fairest reading of the law they might expect from a neutral judge, but forced to guess whether the statute will be declared ambiguous; to guessagain whether the agency’s initial interpretation of the law will be declared “reasonable”; and to guess again whether a later and opposing agency interpretation will also be held “reasonable”? And why should courts, charged with the independent and neutral interpretation of the laws Congress has enacted, defer to such bureaucratic pirouetting?

Despite these concerns, I agree with my colleagues that the interlocutory petition before us does not merit review.The errors apparent in this preliminary ruling might yet be corrected before final judgment. Further, other courts of appeals are actively considering challenges to the same regulation. Before deciding whether to weigh in, we would benefit from hearing their considered judgments—provided, of course, that they are not afflicted with the sameproblems. But waiting should not be mistaken for lack of concern.
 
Last edited:

Goliathan

NES Member
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
2,277
Likes
854
Location
Metro West
So much for Gorsuch I guess....I’ll read the dissent after work today.
Well, I reserve judgment on calling foul on him for this one. This interlocutory case has some issues and I'm hoping this is just a matter of waiting for one of the other, better cases to wend its way up to them. Ruling on a crummy case can be pretty bad, too.
 

DispositionMatrix

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
3,733
Likes
1,020
Location
SoNH

CatSnoutSoup

NES Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
3,287
Likes
6,558
Location
Westgardminsterham MA


🐯
 

NewGuyRay

NES Member
Rating - 100%
11   0   0
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
906
Likes
382
Location
Just North of Boston
So, with scheduled arguments in cases delayed, is there any chance the court will move up completing decisions on cases heard last fall and announce the decisions prior to June?
 
Top Bottom