Yup, that nails it, 3 years ago the cops stopped him in the park, totally justifies the chasing him down and shooting him /sarc
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
They're also saying the guy building the house that Arbery so viciously invaded and violated has video of dozens of other people over the past few months strolling through the construction site.
But wait! NES says nobody ever walks into a vacant house for no good reason. Hmm....
Who is Matt Kavanaugh?Looks like Roddie Bryan (the videographer) took a polygraph, a common preemptive measure for managing one's public image in the face a gathering legal shitstorm.
Such action is similar to what Christine Blasey Ford did relative to the Matt Kavanaugh confirmation hearing.
It would not surprise me to see more use of the "lie detector" in the Arbery case.
Man who filmed Ahmaud Arbery shooting took lie detector test: attorney
The attorney for the man who recorded the video of black jogger Ahmaud Arbery’s shooting death said his client has taken a voluntary lie detector test that confirmed he was not involved in the slay…nypost.com
No reports of anything ever being stolen, oh no POLICE reports of anything being stolen:
‘It’s Murder’: This Shooting of an Unarmed Black Man Is Roiling Georgia
Ahmaud Arbery was chased down by a white father and son, one of them a former cop, and shot. As lockdown eases, an aggrieved community is demanding answers.www.thedailybeast.com
Now its revealed that English, the video surveilance homeowner, did exactly what the cops told him to do and contact Mcmichaels, "day or night" if he spotted someone on his camera again.
Cops told father who shot dead jogger to be a vigilante
Police told the neighbor of one of Ahmaud Arbery's alleged killers, Gregory McMichael, to call him instead of the cops if he needed help, according to a newly-revealed text message.www.dailymail.co.uk
Those pearls are getting harder and harder to hold onto. We need MOAR NES SJW virtue signaling on this one. The one saying no one should jump to conclusions on info but then says we have to believe what we see is my favorite so far.
WATCH: New Video Shows Cops’ Aggressive Encounter With Ahmaud Arbery In 2017
WATCH: New Video Shows Cops' Aggressive Encounter With Ahmaud Arbery In 2017 - Breaking911
Police attempted to use a Taser on Ahmaud Arbery after questioning why he was sitting alone in his car in a park one morning in November 2017, according to records and a police video obtained by the Guardian. Facebook Commentsbreaking911.com
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=142&v=1v7o_6uI9R0&feature=emb_logo
But he fit the description of every wrongdoer.Only 1 person got chased through the neighborhood though. I wonder why?
Funny how you got the name of the nobody liar correct. All 3 names in fact....mea culpa. It's Brett, not Matt. I edited my post.
Used to have Duty Officer at an Army Kaserne in Germany. If there was a bar fight, they'd send a jeep with two MP's, and another jeep with the duty officer and Duty NCO.And then there's the fourth side in a domestic where the victim and the perpetrator will both turn on you at the same time if you try to intervene.
They're also saying the guy building the house that Arbery so viciously invaded and violated has video of dozens of other people over the past few months strolling through the construction site.
But wait! NES says nobody ever walks into a vacant house for no good reason. Hmm....
That video from the Guardian was edited down. I wonder why.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7RmbadxRII&feature=emb_logo
That video from the Guardian was edited down. I wonder why.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7RmbadxRII&feature=emb_logo
A whole lot of police officers really are odious pieces of shit. No call whatsoever to pull out the taser, let alone try to actually use it.
I see a cop attempt to tase a guy for no reason after another cop tries to come up with a way to search his car. All because "he might be up to something".
So I'm not sure what that video is suppose to prove. He may or may not have been smoking weed and gets annoyed when cops try and tase him? Monster!
I'm not saying the initial stop was valid or anything. I'm just saying the video posted by the guardian doesn't show him being aggressive. And he was very aggressive in this video.
Also he had a suspended license, if you listened to the dispatcher.
There was no "stop." He wasn't in motion. He was literally just sitting in a parked car.
Agreed... unfortunately that particular incident would probably fall in guidelines. A lot of them have it equal with pepper spray. You could have sprayed that dude.
Which is illegal in America. Even for white people.There was no "stop." He wasn't in motion. He was literally just sitting in a parked car.
Sure. Or talked respectfully to him, even. Possibly even treated him like a human. Any of those might have worked.
The problem is less the pepper spray or tazer, more the hassling that led up to it. There was literally no reason to disturb him. "Drug deals in the area?" Please.
There was no "stop." He wasn't in motion. He was literally just sitting in a parked car.
But he wasn't trespassing. If anything he was improperly parked at a public park. There was no PC for anything. There wasn't even reasonable suspicion and it was pretty clear the officer knew that.Courts have backed 'high crime area' contributing to developing probable cause. Like it or not, if they had pc to arrest for 'trespassing' the had pc to go in car. He can deny it or get hostile (like when he puffed up to cop and launched towards him.)
But he wasn't trespassing. If anything he was improperly parked at a public park. There was no PC for anything. There wasn't even reasonable suspicion and it was pretty clear the officer knew that.
But he wasn't trespassing. If anything he was improperly parked at a public park. There was no PC for anything. There wasn't even reasonable suspicion and it was pretty clear the officer knew that.
Did the officer attempt to articulate what exactly was suspicious about him sitting alone in a car? The officer mentions drug and gang activity (could be possible but also sounds vague and self-serving); did he see a hand to hand transaction or any other sign of drug activity? Seems like all the officer saw is a black guy in a car.That YT vid description says someone called in a suspicious person.
Did the officer attempt to articulate what exactly was suspicious about him sitting alone in a car? The officer mentions drug and gang activity (could be possible but also sounds vague and self-serving); did he see a hand to hand transaction or any other sign of drug activity? Seems like all the officer saw is a black guy in a car.