If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
I was thinking on doing a form 1 build, sooner rather than later...I gotta figure out how to get $500 in the next month to bag one of these babies before they go away...
I posted that because I figure either military prep schools mean something,
or they don't.
But NYMA isn't in the Big List in the Jan'69 issue of Boy's Life,
so maybe it doesn't have the accreditation you demand.
I used to pray I wouldn't do something stupid enoughIs this like merit badges or something?
Ya got me.And who is this "Willes" guy?
I used to pray I wouldn't do something stupid enough
to get my parents poring over the Military Prep School directory.
I've been saying it for years. Most modern gun laws are the result of Terminator and Terminator II.
And no, it's not even a joke. Look at the time lines and bans shortly after. And then look at whats in those movies and what clueless people keep trying to ban.
That....and you can spell "poring."
What the hell are you?
That....and you can spell "poring."
What the hell are you?
I've been saying it for years. Most modern gun laws are the result of Terminator and Terminator II.
And no, it's not even a joke. Look at the time lines and bans shortly after. And then look at whats in those movies and what clueless people keep trying to ban.
I've been saying it for years. Most modern gun laws are the result of Terminator and Terminator II.
And no, it's not even a joke. Look at the time lines and bans shortly after. And then look at whats in those movies and what clueless people keep trying to ban.
Dennis in MA: I still don't get the "orange" comments from you here, and I guess others.
???
... He already got enough flak and lost enough voters from his dumbass bump stock bullshit. He's not stupid. He's not going to make the same mistake twice, especially leading into the 2020 elections.
I'm not surprised that Trump, The NYC business democrat real estate man/ entertainer republican is completely clueless about suppressors. I also think that that impromptu comment was just an off the cuff remark that isn't going to go anywhere. I doubt that he even had anyone look into it and if he did, he would have quickly been informed that suppressors are already tightly regulated and have been used in no crimes since ever. He's not going to ban suppressors. He already got enough flak and lost enough voters from his dumbass bump stock bullshit. He's not stupid. He's not going to make the same mistake twice, especially leading into the 2020 elections.
Yeah shame they ruled the phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range an NFA item
Dennis in MA: I still don't get the "orange" comments from you here, and I guess others.
???
Dennis in MA: I still don't get the "orange" comments from you here, and I guess others.
???
Some people believe that his SCOTUS picks will make the right judgements but I'm not so sure they will.
I don't feel "set up". Trump has been an astonishingly good president simply by pursuing what should be bipartisan goals. What I always saw was a rich, self-aggrandizing, urban, pro-business, moderate, nationalist, liberal (not progressive) Democrat. That "nationalist" part makes him an enemy of the modern Democratic party, and the "pro-business" and "moderate" aspects give him a fair bit of common ground with Republicans. But from where I sat, it seemed like his support for the 2A just fell out of the sky during his campaign. Trump pandered to, and received, support from "2A people". Nothing wrong with that. It's just politics. It was a negotiation of sorts, and there's the rub. Trump knows what leverage he has at this point, and it means he can do what he wants 2A-wise as long as he stays inside of some solid white lines. Bump stocks and suppressors are fair game. I'd like to think he would veto a renewed AWB, but make no mistake, he's not personally against it.
The way most people define a "right judgment" is if it conforms to their instinctive conclusions. If I were guaranteed to like all their decisions, something would be very wrong. Textualists are fundamentally safer judges from the standpoint of safeguarding liberty. As a matter of principle, that is the sort of judge I want Trump to appoint, even if there are no guarantees.
Facts only, please!
1) What has Trump said AGAINST suppressors?
2) What has Trump DONE against suppressors?
3) What has Trump's SON1 said AGAINST suppressors?
4) What has Trump SON1 DONE against suppressors?
5) What has Trump's SON2 said AGAINST suppressors?
6) What has Trump SON2 DONE against suppressors?
7) Does Trump ever talk to either of his sons?
8) Does Trump ever LISTEN to either of his sons?
Facts only, please!
1) What has Trump said AGAINST suppressors?
2) What has Trump DONE against suppressors?
3) What has Trump's SON1 said AGAINST suppressors?
4) What has Trump SON1 DONE against suppressors?
5) What has Trump's SON2 said AGAINST suppressors?
6) What has Trump SON2 DONE against suppressors?
7) Does Trump ever talk to either of his sons?
8) Does Trump ever LISTEN to either of his sons?