If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Considering what just happened in VB what politician in his right mind would come out and say “I like silencers”????? Never mind the POTUS.
Considering what just happened in VB what politician in his right mind would come out and say “I like silencers”????? Never mind the POTUS.
Don’t get me wrong, I believe they should be legal and that the guy in VB would have done just as much damage without one. But don’t expect any political support for silencers right now or maybe forever at this point.
He could have deflected and moved on lol
Also, gotta love the leading way in which the reporter's question was asked: "Do you believe that silencers should be restricted?" Clearly phrased in that way to imply that silencers are somehow freely available and easy to obtain, when the reality is that it takes a bunch of paperwork and months of waiting.
Trump is the biggest enemy of the 2nd we may have ever had in office.
Basically this. The dude could sign an AWB tomorrow and there'd still be people saying "this is a brilliant move, he's eight steps ahead of Pelosi, he totally owned her!"6D UnderWatEr CheSs GuYs....
Trump is the biggest enemy of the 2nd we may have ever had in office.
You forgot, "Take the guns first, go through due process second."I don't think he's trustworthy and worse I don't think he cares. How I score his actions re 2A,
Trump the Anti
Bump stocks
Suppressor comments
Taps an anti to head the ATF
Trump the supporter
Excellent SJC nomination
I don't see him as a supporter of 2A, I hope I'm wrong.
yall trippin if you think anyone whose in a position of power would want an armed populous
I don't see so much malice in his actions as it is likely just ignorance/stupidity. Some focus group campaign type advisor person handed him a pamphlet that says "How to pander as pro gun to typical jingoservative populist retards" and he's read all 10 pages of it and just recites it by rote memory.
Thankfully that pamphlet mustve had one page that said "do not nominate SC judges that are wonky on 2A or you will pay dearly for it".
-Mike
I'm not saying it's malice in every case. It's that people in power tend to do things conducive to them retaining and expanding that power. 2A doesn't exactly fit that purview.
when RBG kicks. that's it!