Can't understand why everyone thinks that someone has to have a 'national presence', be a big name, etc to get on the SC.
What's the matter with someone who just has some common sense and can read the Federalist papers?
Maybe I'm lacking something in the brain area for saying it, but it doesn't seem that judging a law on it's constitutionality is a very hard thing to do. If you can't write well, get someone else on the court to write the opinion.
I always was one to look at things in a simplistic manner. Probably too simple for this issue. [shock]